Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

My 6.2 vs 5.0 comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2013, 09:10 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wisdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Innisfail, Alberta
Posts: 377
Received 53 Likes on 40 Posts
Default My 6.2 vs 5.0 comparison

Hey there everyone,

So after a few weeks I figured I'd write up my personal comparison of the 6.2 vs 5.0 after owning both. So some info on the trucks, the 5.0 was a 2012 XLT XTR with a 3.73 rear end. The 6.2 is a 2013 FX4 with a 3.73 rear end as well. I'll try to break it down into some categories, my writing structure isn't the best so bare with me.

Power:
So the 6.2 obviously has more jam but really how much more is quite surprising. When I first got my 5.0 I was pretty
impressed by the power overall. Solid throttle response and overall a peppy truck. I had no complaints, till I got my hands on a 6.2. For the average every day drive, the 5.0 has plenty get up and go, more than you'd ever actually need. The one thing I disliked about the 5.0 was the lack of power in 6th gear, I found myself shifting out of it just to gain some speed at a decent rate on the highway, this is one of the major things I love about the 6.2. There is no 6th gear lug in the 6.2 whatsoever, like 1/4 throttle and your gaining speed faster then the 5.0 could at a moderate throttle in 5th gear.

Fuel milage
Now we get to the bread and butter question, what I get asked the most. So obviously my numbers won't be optimal because my 6.2 is so new that it hasn't been fully broke in yet. But overall in my 5.0 I was getting about 15L/100KM. This is about 50/50 city and highway driving at high speed. Obviously some guys get much better milage with their 5.0s but this is just my milage with my heavy foot driving style. So now my 6.2 with the same driving style is averaging between 16.5-17.5L/100KM. I think with a light foot you can probably pull off very comparable milage in the 6.2 once it's broke in , on the highway that is. My tank average is about 850km on the 130L tank in the 6.2, and my 5.0 wasn't much higher then that. In the city if your a heavy foot driver like me the 6.2 is pretty thirsty for sure. But I have to say, I drive a lot of 6.2s in super duties at work, the F150 gets much much better milage then the same motor in the super duty.

Towing
Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to tow with my 6.2 yet and won't till next camping season. Sorry!

Overall driving experience
So this is really based on personal driving habits but for me the 6.2 is leaps and bounds more fun to drive. Its a tire squealing, monster of a truck. It brings a smile to my face every time I punch it. But if your a light driver then there is no difference between the two. Under light throttle from a stop, I can barely tell a difference between this truck and my old truck. Like I said before, on the highway I much Perfer the 6.2 over the 5.0, the torque down low is so much better. In parking lots, I definitely notice I don't have that electronic steering anymore, I miss that.

In conclusion
I believe there is two total different types of people that are going to enjoy each motor. The 5.0 is very economical and is going to keep you happy in the power department. The fuel milage in the city makes the 5.0 a way better commuting truck then the 6.2 in pure cost. But on the other hand, if your the kind of guy that wants a monster under the hood and fuel milage means little to nothing to you, the 6.2 is the way to go. I can't say too much about towing but if towing is your concern, I would recommend the Ecoboost over both these trucks. So in closing, if I had to pick again, I would stick with the 6.2 without hesitation, it's just plain a boatload of fun to drive.

Thanks for reading, sorry if there's any typos, this was all typed on a cell phone. Any questions, don't hesitate to give me a shout.
The following 7 users liked this post by Wisdom:
ak_cowboy (09-11-2013), BMWBig6 (09-11-2013), Cleanmaxx Brian (09-11-2013), cosway (09-13-2013), isthatahemi (09-14-2013), Kenferg1 (09-10-2013), Okiehunter (09-10-2013) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 09-10-2013, 10:02 PM
  #2  
Opinionated Blowhard
 
Kenferg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,007
Received 165 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Well done. I look forward to occasional updates. The 6.2 seems like a great engine for those who are just not into the EB for towing and like the idea of a big 8 for doing the heavy work. I also agree that the roar and driving fun of the 6.2 in the f150 is probably a blast. Have fun!
Old 09-10-2013, 10:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
jwanck11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,204
Received 325 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

Welcome to the paradigm of power!
Old 09-10-2013, 10:27 PM
  #4  
Member
 
BigHutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 95
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I like my 6.2!
Old 09-10-2013, 10:44 PM
  #5  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

It's a great engine, but no way will it come close to your 5.0 mileage wise. Even on the highway.
Old 09-10-2013, 11:02 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Wisdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Innisfail, Alberta
Posts: 377
Received 53 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sullyman
It's a great engine, but no way will it come close to your 5.0 mileage wise. Even on the highway.
Like I said. With my driving habits at close to 90 mph it's not far off, like 2L more, if not less.
Old 09-11-2013, 12:36 AM
  #7  
Inebriated 4 ur safety
 
Al Kohalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,524
Received 894 Likes on 483 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sullyman
It's a great engine, but no way will it come close to your 5.0 mileage wise. Even on the highway.

Yes they do......When coasting down hill with the engine off.
The following 2 users liked this post by Al Kohalic:
ns_redneck (09-12-2013), sullyman (09-11-2013)
Old 09-11-2013, 07:12 AM
  #8  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Al Kohalic
Yes they do......When coasting down hill with the engine off.
Maybe he's running a jib sail with the wind, downhill, with the motor off?
Old 09-11-2013, 10:01 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
CDC5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 823
Received 75 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

Great review, I haven't gotten the chance to drive a 6.2 but sounds like a beast.
Old 09-11-2013, 10:26 AM
  #10  
Inebriated 4 ur safety
 
Al Kohalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,524
Received 894 Likes on 483 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CDC5.0
Great review, I haven't gotten the chance to drive a 6.2 but sounds like a beast.

It is a beast. My co-workers 6.2L reminded me of the performance of my EB when it was stock, but with a V8 exhaust note.


Quick Reply: My 6.2 vs 5.0 comparison



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.