Topic Sponsor
2015 - 2020 Ford F150 General discussion on the 13th generation Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.7 eco vs 3.5 eco: which one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2016, 03:32 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
130428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,923
Received 708 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

^ this right there should be an auto-reply to all future EB vs 5.0 threads, that pretty much sums it up.
Old 03-09-2016, 04:43 PM
  #22  
Found On Road Dominating
 
Bill_The_PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Eastern Canada
Posts: 1,360
Received 187 Likes on 152 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ecopat
^ this right there should be an auto-reply to all future EB vs 5.0 threads, that pretty much sums it up.
^^ yep agree fully. It's not the size of the _____ it's how / what you use your ______for. Get it. Good. new thread please.
Old 03-09-2016, 04:48 PM
  #23  
Beer, Boats, and Trucks.
 
berty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,257
Received 603 Likes on 457 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nanetteschimpf
I just drove the 2.7 EB and the 5.0 back to back. Both offer wonderful driving experiences--as expected the 2.7 has a quick, turbo feel that gets you moving more quickly then its power feels more like the 5.0. The 5.0 just has consistent power without the turbo push and sounds and feels like a traditional, growling truck. Quite different which was pretty cool! I can see that the new F-150 offers something for everyone.
So which did you get??
Old 03-09-2016, 04:57 PM
  #24  
Member
Thread Starter
 
nanetteschimpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 32
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I haven't purchased yet--going to Atlanta this weekend and some of their dealers have a dozen 2015 F-150 trucks remaining so I will see what they have. I think I am leaning to the 2.7 just because i love the turbo and it offers me something new from my 2010 Ford Flex (which is a non ecoboost, non turbo engine).

The real dilemma now is do I get a loaded XLT Sport or more a basic Lariat (heavily discounted to 33K and 35K respectively)?
Old 03-09-2016, 04:58 PM
  #25  
Member
Thread Starter
 
nanetteschimpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 32
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The XLT Sport has the center console and not the fold down seat, so I kind of like that. The Lariats do not have the center console, so that may make my decision for me.
Old 03-09-2016, 05:02 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 106
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Like you, I'm in the buying process since my '01 Lariat 4x4 S-Crew is getting a bit long in the tooth and my car lease ends soon. I don't tow anything heavier than a fishing boat or a trailer with a couple motorcycles. I've test driven new trucks with all three engines about 30 min each. They're all pretty responsive and each has its own character.

I've pretty well decided that, if I get an XLT, I'd be quite happy with either the somewhat-less-expensive 2.7 or the 5.0 if that's what happens to be in the truck that I otherwise want (packages, color, etc). No need for folks like me to spend the extra $$ for the 3.5. If I splurge and go the KR route (right now it's a toss-up), the 5.0 is standard in that trim.

Originally Posted by nanetteschimpf
The Lariats do not have the center console, so that may make my decision for me.
FYI- the Lariats with the 502A package (a worthwhile addition IMO) come with bucket seats, center console and floor shifter.

Last edited by Pinkfloyd; 03-09-2016 at 05:10 PM.
The following users liked this post:
nanetteschimpf (03-09-2016)
Old 03-09-2016, 05:08 PM
  #27  
Senior Member

 
SKBORDERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 778
Received 195 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

You definitely have choices. 2.7 is going to give you the best mileage and can tow if you need it occasionally. The 3.5 has the most torque and is best if you are towing a large amount of the time. The 5.0 has more HP and a better sound, and as you have noted, pulls nicely into the upper RPMS, but does not have a great deal more torque than the 2.7, but will probably give you better mileage if you are going to stick your foot in it all the time.
The following users liked this post:
nanetteschimpf (03-09-2016)
Old 03-09-2016, 05:09 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Jack Anthony Rook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 318
Received 67 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nanetteschimpf
The XLT Sport has the center console and not the fold down seat, so I kind of like that. The Lariats do not have the center console, so that may make my decision for me.
I got an XLT with bucket seats. Didn't want a bench. Didn't care about the color of the truck. The wheel size. Chrome or not. All I wanted was bucket/captain seats.
The following users liked this post:
nanetteschimpf (03-09-2016)



Quick Reply: 2.7 eco vs 3.5 eco: which one?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.