f150 eco boost=sweet
. i was talking to this sale person as i took a 2010 5.4l for a ride and man i could tell the difference between them . but the sales person said the eco boost reaches max torque at 1700 rpm. and stays until up to 5500 rpm. i also like the new drivers command center in the dash is nice. i hate the fact when you switch the selector into the M that the up and down is on the column selector
.i would bet a single cab with the eco boost would be sweet
i did also find a 01 f150 wth the 5.4l with a supercharger that the dealership had for sale. it had 200k miles on it but it is $6,000. a little high for the miles and price. i wouldnt mind it but i dont want to be putting a new engine in 5k miles down the road
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/21/2...20-lb-ft-of-t/
i guess its 90% of torque at 1700rpm. but that is still good.
i guess its 90% of torque at 1700rpm. but that is still good.
The 2011 Ford F-150 now has more exciting engine choices than at any other time in the storied truck's history. But as much as we're looking forward to rocking the new 411-horsepower 6.2-liter V8, the 360-hp 5.0-liter V8 or the 300-hp 3.7-liter V6, the top of-the-line EcoBoost V6 has us the most excited. The reason? Ford keeps taunting us with tales of terrific torque curves and class-leading fuel economy.
While The Blue Oval is still playing coy on fuel economy, we've finally got official word on the power tip. The twin-turbo 3.5-liter will churn out 365 ponies, a figure that's great, but not terribly unexpected in a full-size pickup. The bigger story is the mill's promised 420 pound-feet of torque at 2,500 rpm. That lofty figure is more than General Motors or Chrysler can deliver with their light duty pickups, but not quite enough to out-twist the 434 lb-ft. from Ford's new 6.2-liter V8. But while the 6.2 has stronger numbers all around, the EcoBoost 3.5 can hold its twist longer, with 90 percent of peak power is available from 1,700 rpm all the way to 5,000 rpm.
The EcoBoost 3.5's power figures translate into the ability to tow a best-in-class 11,300 pounds or haul a payload of 3,060 pounds. Impressive stuff, indeed, but we'll only be blown away if the twin-turbo mill can also manage best in-class fuel economy. After all, EcoBoost variants will likely command a significant price increase over what appears to be a very capable new 5.0-liter V8. The EcoBoost 3.5 will become available early in 2011. Hit the jump to check out the official Ford press release.
While The Blue Oval is still playing coy on fuel economy, we've finally got official word on the power tip. The twin-turbo 3.5-liter will churn out 365 ponies, a figure that's great, but not terribly unexpected in a full-size pickup. The bigger story is the mill's promised 420 pound-feet of torque at 2,500 rpm. That lofty figure is more than General Motors or Chrysler can deliver with their light duty pickups, but not quite enough to out-twist the 434 lb-ft. from Ford's new 6.2-liter V8. But while the 6.2 has stronger numbers all around, the EcoBoost 3.5 can hold its twist longer, with 90 percent of peak power is available from 1,700 rpm all the way to 5,000 rpm.
The EcoBoost 3.5's power figures translate into the ability to tow a best-in-class 11,300 pounds or haul a payload of 3,060 pounds. Impressive stuff, indeed, but we'll only be blown away if the twin-turbo mill can also manage best in-class fuel economy. After all, EcoBoost variants will likely command a significant price increase over what appears to be a very capable new 5.0-liter V8. The EcoBoost 3.5 will become available early in 2011. Hit the jump to check out the official Ford press release.
yeah i want to check out the othe engines when they come out. but i think the eco boost will be for me. cause i dont tow much so the mpg would be great. i would only be able to get a base model unless i put a bunch of money down. i got a 302 i might just build up and run for a couple years and wait for ford to work out the bugs.
Trending Topics
PS I am not harping on you or anything, I just do not see where your comming from with that statement so I am just asking for clarification.
No there are no special requirments in mantaining an ecoboost as opposed to a 5.0 or the 6.2. The turbo housing is water cooled and the bearings are cooled with oil. The oil comes from the same pan as the engine so there aren't any extra fluids that need changing.

