Topic Sponsor

Engine performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2015, 02:09 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
DizzyDrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matthew Burr
get the exhaust manifolds off an efi 300, just as good as headers and a 10th the price. other than spending 400-600 on a new intake/carb, theres been a number of people that have ground down the stock intake in order to fit a 2bbl carb, and filled any gaps with that putty/metal compound. after that, pricing continues to increase, get a head off of an old 240 inline six which will increase compression ratio and power output. and last would be a performance camshaft. and i read once about a guy who put a turbo on his (completely custom job)


Stupid question, Is the only difference between the 240 and the 300cc engines the size of the combustion chamber? I was looking at some aftermarket stuff from ford six.com and was not sure if the bolt pattern was the same?
Old 07-15-2015, 02:14 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
DizzyDrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matthew Burr
get the exhaust manifolds off an efi 300, just as good as headers and a 10th the price. other than spending 400-600 on a new intake/carb, theres been a number of people that have ground down the stock intake in order to fit a 2bbl carb, and filled any gaps with that putty/metal compound. after that, pricing continues to increase, get a head off of an old 240 inline six which will increase compression ratio and power output. and last would be a performance camshaft. and i read once about a guy who put a turbo on his (completely custom job)
Stupid Question; The only difference between the 240cc and the 300cc is the combustion chamber? Are the bolt patterns the same?
Old 07-20-2015, 07:33 AM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
David Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Clinton, Tennessee
Posts: 1,032
Received 260 Likes on 190 Posts

Default

Best bang for the buck "in my opinion" would be a gear (rear end) change. I would go with 3.73 or even 4.10's
Old 07-20-2015, 08:28 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lanesteven4570.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 113
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Engine performance

The only thing i see that bad about that is when i get on the highway my fuel economy would suffer . In the city it would be great
Old 07-22-2015, 12:45 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Matthew Burr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 308
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

ya, heads bolt on exactly the same, the difference between the 240 and the 300 was the length of travel in the piston, the 240 pulled less fuel in so it needed a tighter head to keep compression up
Old 09-15-2017, 08:43 PM
  #16  
New to the F150 world
 
MidSouthMitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: SW Tennessee
Posts: 33
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You need bigger displacement or a bigger wallet- Not that an engine swap is anything like inexpensive.
Old 09-17-2017, 11:53 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
justintendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: western pa
Posts: 452
Received 32 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

displacement isnt the problem on a 4.9. head flow is. the fuel injected 4.9 already has shorty headers stock.
Old 09-22-2017, 10:36 PM
  #18  
New to the F150 world
 
MidSouthMitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: SW Tennessee
Posts: 33
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any idea what the compression ratio would be on my stock '92 4.9 if I dropped a 240 head on it? Anyone know how much lift & duration the stock 4.9 can handle without needing valve reliefs in the pistons? How about with the 240 head? Thank you in advance!



Quick Reply: Engine performance



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.