Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Towing with premium

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2019, 03:41 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

If you are going up grades, you do want to use Premium. Made the mistake of using 85 in Colorado once, once. There is no 87 there. Use 91 instead. In non mountain climbing though 87 has worked out just fine.
The following users liked this post:
RichAP (04-23-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 05:12 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
mikeinatlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3,269
Received 1,329 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

On my 5.0 premium is good for a couple mpg and very noticeable difference. Times have changed and old rules no longer apply.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (04-22-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 05:12 PM
  #13  
Grumpy Old Man
 
smokeywren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Midland County Texas, just west of the star in my avatar
Posts: 3,129
Received 879 Likes on 686 Posts

Default

Back when my 2012 3.5L EcoBoost was new, I did extensive testing of regular vs, premium when towing my 5k TT and 6k cargo trailer - mostly across the plains where regular was 87 octane and premium was 91.

Results?

Premium increased MPG enough to pay for the higher cost of premium. Plus the F-150 seemed to "like" towing with the premium a lot more than struggling with regular. So no downside to using premium when towing.

But I was required to plan way ahead and have a nearly-empty 36-gallon gas tank before filling up with premium for a towing trip.

Ideal prep would be to haul a 5-gallon can of premium, then run out of gas before you pour in that 5 gallons of premium, then drive to a gas station and fill up with premium.

I haven't towed with the 2019 yet, so no comment on whether it needs premium or is more cost effective using premium. But Ford still says to use premium when towing, so I probably will, even if it's not cost effective.
The following 2 users liked this post by smokeywren:
chimmike (04-22-2019), Mark Miller (04-23-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 05:28 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
mikeinatlanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 3,269
Received 1,329 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokeywren
Back when my 2012 3.5L EcoBoost was new, I did extensive testing of regular vs, premium when towing my 5k TT and 6k cargo trailer - mostly across the plains where regular was 87 octane and premium was 91.

Results?

Premium increased MPG enough to pay for the higher cost of premium. Plus the F-150 seemed to "like" towing with the premium a lot more than struggling with regular. So no downside to using premium when towing.

But I was required to plan way ahead and have a nearly-empty 36-gallon gas tank before filling up with premium for a towing trip.

Ideal prep would be to haul a 5-gallon can of premium, then run out of gas before you pour in that 5 gallons of premium, then drive to a gas station and fill up with premium.

I haven't towed with the 2019 yet, so no comment on whether it needs premium or is more cost effective using premium. But Ford still says to use premium when towing, so I probably will, even if it's not cost effective.
The newer direct injected and dual injected motors are an even bigger difference than your 2012. Unlike older motors that were either ping or no ping, the new motors can make significant adjustment to take advantage of the increased octane.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (04-22-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 05:31 PM
  #15  
Senile member
 
chimmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL area
Posts: 3,633
Received 1,048 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff1024
I think my paranoia on 93 comes from my days of daily driving a tuned WRX. This was back in 2006 and I understand the turbo charged engines of today are totally different beasts than what we had back then, but putting low octane fuel into Subaru Forced Induction engine was a recipe for all kinds of bad things to happen.
yeah, knock retard systems are quite a bit more advanced. My 07 Mazdaspeed was the same way. It'd sense KR, but couldn't adjust timing enough to compensate....and you'd get a datalog with a lot of KR on it and outright panic.
The following users liked this post:
Jeff1024 (04-22-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 05:51 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
RubyRed Canadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 668
Received 223 Likes on 152 Posts
Default

2016 F150 3.5L Ecoboost towing out 8200lbs trailer, I couldn't notice any difference between 87 or 93, so I stuck with 87. I tow at 65MPH in 5th gear (lock out 6th). The truck runs smoooooooth.
Old 04-22-2019, 08:38 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
untraceable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 425
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Ecoboosts are some of the only turbo motors capable of 87. That doesn’t mean they like it. One of this big tuners showed a stock G2 eco hitting knock detectors on 87. So much more when it’s hot out, run premium when towing
The following 2 users liked this post by untraceable:
chimmike (04-23-2019), Mark Miller (04-27-2019)
Old 04-22-2019, 09:30 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BadAltitude
In high elevation areas regular is 85 octane. 87 octane is readily available but is labeled (and priced) as mid grade. Premium is 89, 90 or 91 octane depending on station.

As you experienced running 85 isn’t good! Out West you have to look at the pump and read the octane when filling EcoBoosts. Ford doesn’t recommend less than 87.
Thats the Fact Jack! The 85 was by mistake since I was running regular the entire trip. Going up that first 6% on I-70 in Colorado, the truck ran really hot. That truck only had a 26 gallon tank so the next fill was not too far away and I used Premium after that, truck pulled much better and ran somewhat cooler too. Lesson learned, check the Octane before filling, not the label.

I have yet to run premium in my 18 yet, but the 14 and 16 saw no difference in MPG when towing, and since the 16 ran like crap regardless of a tune or not with premium I just ran 87 all the time. The 14 with a 91 tow/perf tune ran great and got better MPG in the summer on Premium.
Old 04-25-2019, 04:28 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Maury82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 332
Received 87 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I run premium when towing, especially during the heat of the summer day, and I can tell the difference in how it pulls..

On a cool summer night, I may consider running regular if the terrain is flat enough.
Old 04-26-2019, 11:04 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
schmenke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 570
Received 111 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by smokeywren
Back when my 2012 3.5L EcoBoost was new, I did extensive testing of regular vs, premium when towing my 5k TT and 6k cargo trailer - mostly across the plains where regular was 87 octane and premium was 91.

Results?

Premium increased MPG enough to pay for the higher cost of premium. Plus the F-150 seemed to "like" towing with the premium a lot more than struggling with regular. So no downside to using premium when towing.....
Almost identical situation for me..
Pulling our relatively lightweight TT (~5,000lbs) on an identical route on separate occasions to one of our favourite campgrounds, using both 87 and 93 octane, I definitely noticed a difference in performance.
Nowadays I only use the premium juice when towing, and find the benefits most noticeable in the mountainous areas in my neck of the woods.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (04-29-2019)


Quick Reply: Towing with premium



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.