Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.

Payload capacity safety margin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2020 | 11:58 AM
  #61  
akamarcus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 63
Likes: 12
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by AC53
I think you've likely gotten most of what you need in responses and perhaps more than you wanted, but strangely enough, not necessarily direct answers to your questions. I'll try to provide slightly more direct answers for you....
Thanks for the reply! I certainly have received a lot of useful information. I think I'll feel better with a slight safety margin (~10%), but at least I don't have to be seeking a HDPP just to go on a camping trip with a small TT.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2020 | 02:16 PM
  #62  
TerryD64's Avatar
Senior Member
Veteran: Air Force
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 493
Likes: 230
From: Windsor, CO
Default

Originally Posted by AC53
I think you've likely gotten most of what you need in responses and perhaps more than you wanted, but strangely enough, not necessarily direct answers to your questions. I'll try to provide slightly more direct answers for you.


I do believe that the notion of having a safety margin is misunderstood by a lot of folks. The rating on all new Ford vehicles is the safe amount for that vehicle. What Ford is saying is that if the vehicle is new or in like-new condition, it can safely tow that amount. It doesn't say that the driver is competent or that the vehicle isn't capable of towing more than that safely if appropriate modifications are made. All it says is that based on SAE criteria that vehicle when new, in that configuration, is able to meet or surpass the requirements to satisfy the SAE testing for safe towing.

The Ford rating is arrived at using the SAE Jxxxxx specifications for determining safe towing ratings for each specific vehicle configuration. Therefore, there is no "safety margin" required per se. There are three reasons why one should consider adding a safety margin, however:
  1. Non-SAE rating - A vehicle older than the SAE specs and/or not rated per those specs. When the SAE specs were introduced GM reduced the tow capacity ratings on almost all their trucks whereas AFAIK, Ford only needed to do that on a few specific configurations
  2. Tow vehicle not in excellent condition - Tow ratings are for a new vehicle, not a 10-year-old one.
    • SAE Rating is for a new vehicle (they can't test and verify anything else). So, based on having full (or near) brake rotor and brake pad thickness with fresh quality high-rated brake fluid, good fresh coolant, properly rated and inflated near new tires, good suspension, no modifications, etc., etc.
    • A tow vehicle that is 3-4 years old and in good condition and properly maintained, might run at a lower rating if subjected to the SAE testing, but I've not seen anything on that and barring such info, for anyone to say that you should drop 20% vs 10% or 30% is mostly pure speculation. So I'll say drop 10% because there are so many that will want to take issue with any figure. ;-)
  3. Driver has little experience or low comfort level - Safe towing is not just about ratings. Some folks are naturals at towing and some veteran towers will never be good or safe (just like so many drivers on the road). As a rule-of-thumb, the less experience one has the greater margin they should leave themselves because things can seem to happen suddenly and out of nowhere that an experienced driver might have anticipated.
There has been a lot of talk on frontal area here, and that what is being towed is very important, not just the weight. My 2-cents worth would be that it is an important part of the equation. Don't forget, however, that Ford is simply using the 60-square-feet as the parameter for the tow ratings because that is the frontal area required for the SAE testing, so Ford is simply identifying that their ratings are based on that frontal area. That in no way shape or form means that there is a limit of 60, only that the rating is based on 60. More frontal area (over the same type) would reduce your max tow rating, but I don't know by how much, therefore, the fact that your specific TT has more than the SAE tested area but has better aero means that one can't easily identify whether there is a need to introduce a safety margin based on that or not. If you are towing with more frontal area than that, but with better aero than a straight slab or V-nose (doesn't help nearly as much as most think - a sloped top is better), you might arrive at the same or better ratings if tested.
While your information is correct and valid:

Please do not confuse Tow Rating with Payload (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GWWR) - Curb weight of truck). Remember you are carrying the tongue weight of the trailer not merely pulling it.

In most cases Class 2a trucks (1/2 tons pickups and vans) max out on payload before hitting the the stated tow rating especially if the vehicle is carrying more than a 150 pound driver and/or the tongue weight of the trailer is greater than the 10% provided for in the test.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2020 | 04:57 PM
  #63  
AC53's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 13
Likes: 7
From: Nova Scotia
Default

Originally Posted by TerryD64
...
Please do not confuse Tow Rating with Payload (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GWWR) - Curb weight of truck). Remember you are carrying the tongue weight of the trailer not merely pulling it...
I didn't think that I did. Certainly, it was not my intention to discuss the different (but very related) issues of TWR and GVWR or GCWR, in that post. My intention was to address Tow Rating (TWR) only.

Originally Posted by TerryD64
...
In most cases Class 2a trucks (1/2 tons pickups and vans) max out on payload before hitting the the stated tow rating...
Definitely agree, 100%.
In fact, this can become a problem fairly quickly even with 3/4 ton pickups if towing weights that are too heavy for a 1/2 ton. I've had to re-jig things on 3/4 ton Fords, Chevys and Rams when towing my race car and tools, jacks, spares, etc. It is easy to run out even on a 3/4. I'm looking at switching boats from what an F-150 could tow within spec to what will require an F-250 to stay in towing spec, but am looking at two F-350s currently to stay within Payload spec. I'll get an additional 620 pounds of payload with the comparable F-350 over the F-250. The boat will require wide-load permits, etc., and with the possibility of wanting a generator for doing boat-yard work and other items, payload is close without any additional people or items on the F-250. I'm not going to tell my two 6'4", 260-pound sons to walk. ;-)
Originally Posted by TerryD64
...
especially if the vehicle is carrying more than a 150 pound driver and/or the tongue weight of the trailer is greater than the 10% provided for in the test.
The SAE ratings are actually done with a 10% tongue weight and a minimum of a 150lb driver and a 150lb passenger (or sandbags for the passenger) for a total of a minimum of 300 pounds occupant weight.
There is also the requirement for at least a minimum (can't recall the #) weight added to represent gear and hitch equipment.

As for tongue weight and the 10% figure, that is another can of worms. A tongue weight of 10% or less on a TT is okay for well designed/engineered ones, but the worse the trailer the more tongue weight is usually required. Many European TTs run fantastic at as little as 7% or less.
As always, proper tire pressure (maybe what 10% of folks tow at proper pressures?), number of axles (dual and tri-axles want less), etc., will dictate the best tongue weight but my understanding is that the best TT run at 10%-12% (boats typically at 7%-10%).
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM.