Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

T T diffrences in weight.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2018, 07:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default T T diffrences in weight.

Currently I have a Coleman Lantern series, CTS274BH, a non slide, bunkhouse, aluminum panels on wood frame with a GVWR of 7300# or so. Possibly next year I will be upgrading to a bunkhouse with a slideout or two. I see there are different types of trailer constructions, so which are the lighter ones, Skin on frame, or laminated glass? I want to stay in the 7300-7700 GVWR range, and knowing which type is lighter will help narrow down the choices to look for.

The floorplan I am considering moves the futon/couch from the front by the queen bed to the side and swapping the sink/stove with the dinette, putting that next to the couch/futon. I also would like for the rear slide to have an additional bunk so three can sleep in the back. This will most likely be the last year either of my kids will fit on the Futon without becoming a pretzel.

So far on my third year with a 2014 model that was like new when I bought it, and have not one single issue or complaint with it. I've done some upgrades like added a built in surge suppressor that also checks line condition and trips if voltage drops. Changed all lighting to LED inside and out, and this year adding Strongarm stabilizers and a hitch bracket to store the BO when not in use. I haven't pulled it out of storage yet due to the crappy weather and the truck issues, so had to postpone a trip that was planned at the end of the month.

Since I am on the fence about what the future holds on my current truck, knowing what trailer that I may upgrade to will help in the decision making for my next truck, whether to go with a Platinum F150, new, or seek out a used Superduty Platinum. Either way, since the truck is to be a long term purchase (what the current one was SUPPOSED to be), I want one that I will enjoy as well as do the job it needs to. Between the 502a and a Platinum, the payload should be similar, and I have plenty of payload for my current needs, but what will I need for the type of trailer I want to upgrade to, that's the question.

For those who TL;DR, Just looking to see which type construction is the lightest.
Old 05-14-2018, 04:49 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,074
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Well if you must go with a Platinum and want to tow with it, I would go with a F250 at least, so you'll have some payload for the current or even a heavier future trailer. These 1/2 ton F150 Platinums don't have much payload at all so I wouldn't tow anything but the lightest trailer.
The following users liked this post:
chimmike (05-14-2018)
Old 05-14-2018, 09:51 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Jeff1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 632
Received 223 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

People always ripping on the Platinum payload capacity I swear. I just sit back, set my front seat to massage, and ignore them acdii.

The platinum works for us because we are only towing a 23ft boat, 525lbs on the tongue and our payload is 1545 on a 2015 3.5 Eco platinum. I can see how you would eat that up quickly /w a TT though.
Old 05-14-2018, 10:16 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 14,966
Received 5,989 Likes on 3,553 Posts

Default

OP wants to know about trailer construction, and people are responding about payload... #ReadingComprehension
The following users liked this post:
acdii (05-14-2018)
Old 05-14-2018, 11:00 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,074
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ricktwuhk
OP wants to know about trailer construction, and people are responding about payload... #ReadingComprehension
Originally Posted by acdii
Since I am on the fence about what the future holds on my current truck, knowing what trailer that I may upgrade to will help in the decision making for my next truck, whether to go with a Platinum F150, new, or seek out a used Superduty Platinum.
Construction doesn't matter, as there are heavy and light Stick and Tin travel trailers, and as there are heavy and light Laminated trailers. Finding hung fiberglass anymore is next to impossible as it wasn't a popular construction.

You have to know the individual models weight to make an educated decision. Less than 1500 lbs payload will push it for the OPs current trailer when it's loaded with gear, clothes, food, water and when the truck is loaded with a family, gear, and add-on bed accessories.

I will say stay away from laminated floors and roofs unless you plan on it being a disposable camper. I feel the same about most laminated walls also as I've seen most have delamination on them, even new ones still on the dealers showroom floor from glue failure.

Going larger necessitates a Platinum with a F250 chassis, to keep from overloading.

Last edited by Mike Up; 05-14-2018 at 11:06 AM.
Old 05-14-2018, 01:59 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jeff1024
People always ripping on the Platinum payload capacity I swear. I just sit back, set my front seat to massage, and ignore them acdii.

The platinum works for us because we are only towing a 23ft boat, 525lbs on the tongue and our payload is 1545 on a 2015 3.5 Eco platinum. I can see how you would eat that up quickly /w a TT though.
My current is 1583# and tows my 7600# trailer just fine, so a Plat would work just as well. The question I asked is, which type construction is lightest so that I can go to a slideout and maintain the same GVWR.

Here is an example of what I am looking for, 7600# GVWR http://www.dutchmen.com/kodiak/floor.../?modelId=4940

What I currently have, http://www.dutchmen.com/coleman/floo.../?modelId=4311 Also 7600# GVWR

The first is an example, but I did find one a few weeks back with a lower base weight, higher cargo weight, but same GVWR. I think it was a dual slideout model, but can't remember what it was, or it's construction type. I like the looks of the smooth sided panels, less likely to get dinged by hail (know that all too wel with my current one), but as mentioned, I don't like the risk of delam.

Last edited by acdii; 05-14-2018 at 02:13 PM.
Old 05-14-2018, 04:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,074
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acdii
My current is 1583# and tows my 7600# trailer just fine, so a Plat would work just as well. The question I asked is, which type construction is lightest so that I can go to a slideout and maintain the same GVWR.

Here is an example of what I am looking for, 7600# GVWR http://www.dutchmen.com/kodiak/floor.../?modelId=4940

What I currently have, http://www.dutchmen.com/coleman/floo.../?modelId=4311 Also 7600# GVWR

The first is an example, but I did find one a few weeks back with a lower base weight, higher cargo weight, but same GVWR. I think it was a dual slideout model, but can't remember what it was, or it's construction type. I like the looks of the smooth sided panels, less likely to get dinged by hail (know that all too wel with my current one), but as mentioned, I don't like the risk of delam.
The Kodiak has a laminated foam sandwich floor, I'd definitely pass on that. Nothing but complaints on that type of construction all over the RV forums. Your giving up quality for quantity with that type of camper. Your also give up water storage tank size that essential with most State Parks that offer only partial hookups. There's a reason why it's so light compared to a comparable Stick and Tin model. At least it has a truss roof but a laminated floor is what is the most problematic with light weight trailers besides delaminating walls.

Also you can't compare GVWR of travel trailers, you need to compare UVW. That Kodiak is over 1000 lbs heavier than your Coleman. The Kodiak just has over 1000 lbs LESS PAYLOAD than your Coleman.

Last edited by Mike Up; 05-14-2018 at 04:25 PM.
Old 05-14-2018, 04:58 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
ggallant1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Roseburg, OR
Posts: 407
Received 67 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by acdii
My current is 1583# and tows my 7600# trailer just fine, so a Plat would work just as well. The question I asked is, which type construction is lightest so that I can go to a slideout and maintain the same GVWR.

Here is an example of what I am looking for, 7600# GVWR http://www.dutchmen.com/kodiak/floor.../?modelId=4940

What I currently have, http://www.dutchmen.com/coleman/floo.../?modelId=4311 Also 7600# GVWR

The first is an example, but I did find one a few weeks back with a lower base weight, higher cargo weight, but same GVWR. I think it was a dual slideout model, but can't remember what it was, or it's construction type. I like the looks of the smooth sided panels, less likely to get dinged by hail (know that all too wel with my current one), but as mentioned, I don't like the risk of delam.

I am heavily in the research phase for TT's right now and I drive a 2013 Platinum. Check out the Grand Design Imagine 2800BH, it is my #1 choice and it sounds like it fits the bill of what you are wanting and well within weights. GVWR is 7600 and dry hitch is 575. Grand Design is leading the market right now in terms of customer service and build quality, based on my extensive research. I plan to invest in a propride hitch as well.
Old 05-14-2018, 05:11 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Mike Up's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,074
Received 538 Likes on 398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ggallant1
I am heavily in the research phase for TT's right now and I drive a 2013 Platinum. Check out the Grand Design Imagine 2800BH, it is my #1 choice and it sounds like it fits the bill of what you are wanting and well within weights. GVWR is 7600 and dry hitch is 575. Grand Design is leading the market right now in terms of customer service and build quality, based on my extensive research. I plan to invest in a propride hitch as well.
I'd be careful on Grand Designs. They have a lot of cheap short cuts as in very very thin bunk mattresses, vanity sinks, and fit and finish. My dealer is a seller of Grand Designs and they just didn't compare to the Jaycos in quality. Even though Dutchman doesn't have as much lux features, they had better fit and finish as well.

Also dry hitch weight means nothing. After loaded with propane tanks, batteries, and all inside camper gear, and etc, tongue weights are between 12% and 14% 'normally' with an 'average' of 13% of loaded trailer weight on most.
Old 05-15-2018, 09:39 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up
The Kodiak has a laminated foam sandwich floor, I'd definitely pass on that. Nothing but complaints on that type of construction all over the RV forums. Your giving up quality for quantity with that type of camper. Your also give up water storage tank size that essential with most State Parks that offer only partial hookups. There's a reason why it's so light compared to a comparable Stick and Tin model. At least it has a truss roof but a laminated floor is what is the most problematic with light weight trailers besides delaminating walls.

Also you can't compare GVWR of travel trailers, you need to compare UVW. That Kodiak is over 1000 lbs heavier than your Coleman. The Kodiak just has over 1000 lbs LESS PAYLOAD than your Coleman.
I know that, which is why I said Just an example of the floor plan as that one has too high a base weight. The info on the floor though is very helpful and I remember when I was first looking at trailers that quite a few had spongy floors, so once I get an idea of which model and manufacturer, I plan to dig deep into reliability and check out used ones closely for delam and spongy floors. On mine I am very picky on roof care and make sure I clean it twice a year as well as protect it from UV, and make sure all the seams are tight, any iffy ones get resealed. The better care I take of it now, the less I need to do to it when time to sell it. Right now it is in better shape then when I bought it and it was like new when I bought it. Well, except for the hail dings on its front. It's a reminder of our Trip to Utah.


Quick Reply: T T diffrences in weight.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 AM.