Anyone tow a decent size tt with v8 3.55
#11
Others have said it, but power isn't likely to be your issue so the rear end at 3.55 or 3.73 is likely OK. You will most likely hit your payload limit well before your tow limit.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Others have said it, but power isn't likely to be your issue so the rear end at 3.55 or 3.73 is likely OK. You will most likely hit your payload limit well before your tow limit.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
There's a pick of the door sticker and it is L6 which is the elocker 3.73. What do ya think of the truck.
#15
Others have said it, but power isn't likely to be your issue so the rear end at 3.55 or 3.73 is likely OK. You will most likely hit your payload limit well before your tow limit.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
If the 3.73 was a $1k option, I would lean towards a truck that cost a $1k less and a REALLY nice hitch setup over the 3.73 for the $1k premium. Just my 2 cents from reading about quite a few setups here.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Agreed. Where I tow in Michigan it's pretty flat outside of the long gradual hills. My main reason for looking for the 3.73 was as u mention I'd rather not have the truck pumping out 4500rpms while going up a hill and I'd never come close to the max tow of 9300#'s whereas the tt I'm looking at with weight in the trailer would get me close to the 7700#'s with the 3.55.
#18
Right. The fact is, with modern six or ten speed transmissions it is easy find the "Sweet spot" for your combination. It may be 3,000 rpm in fifth or 3,500 rpm in fourth. No need to change rear axle ratios.
#19
1500 - 7700*0.13 - 200 - 100 = 199#
It gets eaten up surprisingly fast. So now you have 199# of remaining payload. Have a wife? Or an aftermarket bedliner or floormats? Subtract those also. Now subtract anything else in the truck--kids, car seats, dog, coolers, luggage, etc. Tonneau cover? You get the gist.
Nicer hitch setups start with equalizer and blue ox setups. There are others out there that I'm sure will be recommended. Premium hitches would be the propride / hensley hitches. They are insanely expensive, but I guess if you are going to make a lifetime out of towing larger trailers you could eventually justify it.
The following users liked this post:
Ricktwuhk (09-19-2017)
#20
One can make estimates based on the weight of floormats and kids, but spending ten bucks at the scales will give you the actual weight of your tow vehicle. Sadly, it will be higher than you think. Subtract that from your pickup's GVWR to arrive at the manufacturer's payload rating. Thankfully, Ford gave us a few hundred much needed pounds when they switched to Aluminum.