Topic Sponsor
Towing/ Hauling/ Plowing Discuss all of your towing and/or cargo moving experiences here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.4 3.73 vs. 3.5 eco 3.55 Better towing?

Old 02-16-2017, 02:19 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
untraceable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 425
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Odds are that 2010 does not have select shift transmission. Youll spend more time fighting the tranny in the 2010
Old 02-16-2017, 02:21 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
untraceable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 425
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

8,000lb trailer is pushing it for any half ton truck, but I doubt you could actually tell the difference between a 3.55 and 3.73. 2013 has a better tranny and more torque at lower rpm
Old 02-16-2017, 02:23 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
doctorschlachter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Waugh, AB
Posts: 486
Received 112 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powerstrokeaaron
I'm going to check it out today will check the payload. Do you think the ecoboost will have any power issues pulling that big grade with 3.55's and the 33's on it?
You will not be shy on power with that set up. She will pull like a train.
Old 02-16-2017, 03:18 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
BRUTE448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 1,117
Received 158 Likes on 134 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by powerstrokeaaron
I'm going to check it out today will check the payload. Do you think the ecoboost will have any power issues pulling that big grade with 3.55's and the 33's on it?
comp'd to a 5.4 and 33's i'd opt for the 3.5 eco any day of the week.
Old 02-16-2017, 10:19 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
acdii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,828
Received 2,719 Likes on 2,056 Posts

Default

I pulled a 6300# trailer up I70 out of Denver with a 14 EB with 3.15 gears. It pulled like it wasn't there, kept it at 65 MPH up that grade, however, I had it tuned, and was not watching temps, so it slightly overheated. It did not have a tow package either, which most likely helped with it overheating.

The 3.5 with a tow package will out pull anything else safely, regardless of the gearing, but just make sure whatever one you get, it has the payload needed for that kind of weight.
Old 02-16-2017, 10:35 PM
  #16  
Member
 
VernDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Select shift transmission if the 2010 has it she might be workable. But EB 3.55 would be better if you can afford. 8,000 is a load. Assuming WDH and use of a scale the two most important numbers from safety handling standpoint axel weights / distribution and GCVW are far and away your most important numbers.
Old 02-17-2017, 03:27 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
SailorSam20500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 122
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

A few years back, the Fast Lane Truck guys used a 3.5 EB to pull 8 and 10k trailers up that big grade in Colorado. The EB was able to pull without issue, they actually had to back off the throttle to stay under 65 mph. There is a u-tube out there showing the runs.
My thought, pulling up a big grade AT SEA LEVEL, both trucks will do well. If you are at altitude, the EB will win hands down. The EB will push lots of O2 into the engine, the normally aspirated will loose power as you get higher.
EB will guzzle LOTS of gas though.
Old 02-17-2017, 05:11 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
johndeerefarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 866
Received 119 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by untraceable
8,000lb trailer is pushing it for any half ton truck, but I doubt you could actually tell the difference between a 3.55 and 3.73. 2013 has a better tranny and more torque at lower rpm
Nope, not pushing it at all.. You ever towed that much before? I have towed as much as 15k with one.

Old 02-18-2017, 03:35 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,880
Received 701 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

I really wouldn't want to pull much more trailer with my F150 but it has more to do with the 145WB and the fact the trailer is 28'11" than weight I believe.

I suspect a 164WB with HDPP would pull a 12,000 lb 32' Trailer just fine.
Old 03-01-2017, 05:43 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
zx12-iowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: midwest
Posts: 4,093
Received 646 Likes on 498 Posts

Default

I had a 5.4 with the 3.73. It pulled well but...

I also had a 3.5 eco with 3.55 gears. The difference was astounding. I was laughing at how much better the eco pulled the same 8k lb load. Hardly ever shifted down on medium sized midwest hills. 5.4 shifted down all the time and had a hard time keeping speed up hills. eco would do any speed you wanted and accelerate well even. wow!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.