Topic Sponsor
Members Builds See any build threads created by members to track progress of their projects.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

OCMike's RCSB Guard Metallic 5.0 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 09:44 AM
  #721  
Doesn't matter!

 
sddesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: 07885
Posts: 1,836
Received 1,915 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

I'm running regular 87 Shell ATM, the Omega tune can use any grade, after a few tanks of 87 with the tune I'll try 93 Shell. I don't have e85 available in this state for some reason, I'd have to travel 60 miles into Pennsylvania to get it. I want to start with what I have been using to see a difference, the nice thing with the nGauge is it does data logging.
The following users liked this post:
nubbins_ (01-15-2019)
Old 01-15-2019, 09:55 AM
  #722  
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 4,160
Received 3,057 Likes on 1,685 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sddesigns
I'm running regular 87 Shell ATM, the Omega tune can use any grade, after a few tanks of 87 with the tune I'll try 93 Shell. I don't have e85 available in this state for some reason, I'd have to travel 60 miles into Pennsylvania to get it. I want to start with what I have been using to see a difference, the nice thing with the nGauge is it does data logging.
Nice...I ran E85 when I was still N/A it ran great but the MPG was horrible. Then the station I was buying from ran out last spring and it wasn't convenient to buy any more, and I was going to install the Whipple anyway which doesn't support it.

Right now 93 is only a $0.25 more then E85 anyway, with the Whipple 91 is minimum.



Mike

Last edited by OCMike; 01-15-2019 at 10:00 AM.
Old 01-15-2019, 10:02 AM
  #723  
Doesn't matter!

 
sddesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: 07885
Posts: 1,836
Received 1,915 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

Our A.S.S.hat governor added .30 state gas sales tax on our fuel, we were second lowest in the country, now were 3 highest. I do have a Shell discount card that I can save anywhere between .05-.30 a gallon with a max of 20 gallons pumped.
The following users liked this post:
OCMike (01-15-2019)
Old 01-15-2019, 11:31 AM
  #724  
Senior Member
 
RayoVac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 411
Received 158 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OCMike
Nice...I ran E85 when I was still N/A it ran great but the MPG was horrible. Then the station I was buying from ran out last spring and it wasn't convenient to buy any more, and I was going to install the Whipple anyway which doesn't support it.

Right now 93 is only a $0.25 more then E85 anyway, with the Whipple 91 is minimum.



Mike
Damn... I did not get that sticker in any of my stuff. I thought maybe it was in my bin of parts... but nope. I wonder if Whipple would send me one?
Old 01-15-2019, 12:47 PM
  #725  
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 4,160
Received 3,057 Likes on 1,685 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RayoVac
Damn... I did not get that sticker in any of my stuff. I thought maybe it was in my bin of parts... but nope. I wonder if Whipple would send me one?
I would call them yes. There is also this one that I put on the underside of the hood above the FoMoCo sticker.



Mike
Old 01-15-2019, 01:06 PM
  #726  
Senior Member
 
nubbins_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 525
Received 195 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sddesigns
Our A.S.S.hat governor added .30 state gas sales tax on our fuel, we were second lowest in the country, now were 3 highest. I do have a Shell discount card that I can save anywhere between .05-.30 a gallon with a max of 20 gallons pumped.
Try $1.29/L - $4.92/gal? lol Not too long ago, it was $1.61/L - $6.09/gal. That's 87 octane. 91 was $6.78/gal at the time. The rest of the province is usually quite a bit cheaper; we drivers pay out the butt in tax to sustain a horribly inadequate and laughably inconsistent public transit system that we don't/can't even use, half of which runs on CNG and electricity anyways. Translink takes something like $0.30/L - $1.1/gal in taxes. Everyone says 91 does good things for the '18 5.0, I just can't afford to run it lol.

I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
Old 01-15-2019, 01:09 PM
  #727  
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 4,160
Received 3,057 Likes on 1,685 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nubbins_
Try $1.29/L - $4.92/gal? lol Not too long ago, it was $1.61/L - $6.09/gal. That's 87 octane. 91 was $6.78/gal at the time. The rest of the province is usually quite a bit cheaper; we drivers pay out the butt in tax to sustain a horribly inadequate and laughably inconsistent public transit system that we don't/can't even use, half of which runs on CNG and electricity anyways. Translink takes something like $0.30/L - $1.1/gal in taxes. Everyone says 91 does good things for the '18 5.0, I just can't afford to run it lol.

I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
Ouch....at those prices a 2.7 with big turbos, intercooler and tune would look pretty attractive.


Mike
Old 01-15-2019, 01:22 PM
  #728  
Doesn't matter!

 
sddesigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: 07885
Posts: 1,836
Received 1,915 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nubbins_
Try $1.29/L - $4.92/gal? lol Not too long ago, it was $1.61/L - $6.09/gal. That's 87 octane. 91 was $6.78/gal at the time. The rest of the province is usually quite a bit cheaper; we drivers pay out the butt in tax to sustain a horribly inadequate and laughably inconsistent public transit system that we don't/can't even use, half of which runs on CNG and electricity anyways. Translink takes something like $0.30/L - $1.1/gal in taxes. Everyone says 91 does good things for the '18 5.0, I just can't afford to run it lol.

I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
Damn glad I don't have to pay those prices our 87 is 2.149/gallon and 93 is 2.559/gallon
Old 01-15-2019, 02:17 PM
  #729  
Senior Member
 
nubbins_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 525
Received 195 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OCMike
Ouch....at those prices a 2.7 with big turbos, intercooler and tune would look pretty attractive.

Mike
There was a near-identical black 301A FX4 RCSB on the lot with my truck, 2.7 3.55, but I didn't know about it until later because the sales rep assigned to me was an imbecile. I can probably count on 19MPG with a 2.7, but my area is not conducive to MPGs though.
The following users liked this post:
OCMike (01-15-2019)
Old 01-28-2019, 12:32 PM
  #730  
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
OCMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Osceola, Indiana
Posts: 4,160
Received 3,057 Likes on 1,685 Posts

Default

Here's another one for Tommy




Mike
The following 2 users liked this post by OCMike:
1995GreenMachine (01-06-2020), Firerunner (01-28-2019)


Quick Reply: OCMike's RCSB Guard Metallic 5.0 Build



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.