OCMike's RCSB Guard Metallic 5.0 Build
#721
Doesn't matter!
I'm running regular 87 Shell ATM, the Omega tune can use any grade, after a few tanks of 87 with the tune I'll try 93 Shell. I don't have e85 available in this state for some reason, I'd have to travel 60 miles into Pennsylvania to get it. I want to start with what I have been using to see a difference, the nice thing with the nGauge is it does data logging.
The following users liked this post:
nubbins_ (01-15-2019)
#722
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
I'm running regular 87 Shell ATM, the Omega tune can use any grade, after a few tanks of 87 with the tune I'll try 93 Shell. I don't have e85 available in this state for some reason, I'd have to travel 60 miles into Pennsylvania to get it. I want to start with what I have been using to see a difference, the nice thing with the nGauge is it does data logging.
Right now 93 is only a $0.25 more then E85 anyway, with the Whipple 91 is minimum.
Mike
Last edited by OCMike; 01-15-2019 at 10:00 AM.
#723
Doesn't matter!
Our A.S.S.hat governor added .30 state gas sales tax on our fuel, we were second lowest in the country, now were 3 highest. I do have a Shell discount card that I can save anywhere between .05-.30 a gallon with a max of 20 gallons pumped.
The following users liked this post:
OCMike (01-15-2019)
#724
Nice...I ran E85 when I was still N/A it ran great but the MPG was horrible. Then the station I was buying from ran out last spring and it wasn't convenient to buy any more, and I was going to install the Whipple anyway which doesn't support it.
Right now 93 is only a $0.25 more then E85 anyway, with the Whipple 91 is minimum.
Mike
Right now 93 is only a $0.25 more then E85 anyway, with the Whipple 91 is minimum.
Mike
#725
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
#726
Senior Member
I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
#727
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Try $1.29/L - $4.92/gal? lol Not too long ago, it was $1.61/L - $6.09/gal. That's 87 octane. 91 was $6.78/gal at the time. The rest of the province is usually quite a bit cheaper; we drivers pay out the butt in tax to sustain a horribly inadequate and laughably inconsistent public transit system that we don't/can't even use, half of which runs on CNG and electricity anyways. Translink takes something like $0.30/L - $1.1/gal in taxes. Everyone says 91 does good things for the '18 5.0, I just can't afford to run it lol.
I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
Mike
#728
Doesn't matter!
Try $1.29/L - $4.92/gal? lol Not too long ago, it was $1.61/L - $6.09/gal. That's 87 octane. 91 was $6.78/gal at the time. The rest of the province is usually quite a bit cheaper; we drivers pay out the butt in tax to sustain a horribly inadequate and laughably inconsistent public transit system that we don't/can't even use, half of which runs on CNG and electricity anyways. Translink takes something like $0.30/L - $1.1/gal in taxes. Everyone says 91 does good things for the '18 5.0, I just can't afford to run it lol.
I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
I'm very jealous that you're tuned now and enjoying the real output of the 5.0. I guess I'm still hung up over warranty concerns after seeing a couple of 2.8 LWNs bending rods on the GDE tune on the old truck's forum.
#729
Senior Member
There was a near-identical black 301A FX4 RCSB on the lot with my truck, 2.7 3.55, but I didn't know about it until later because the sales rep assigned to me was an imbecile. I can probably count on 19MPG with a 2.7, but my area is not conducive to MPGs though.
The following users liked this post:
OCMike (01-15-2019)
#730
TOTM Sept. '18
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Here's another one for Tommy
Mike
Mike
The following 2 users liked this post by OCMike:
1995GreenMachine (01-06-2020),
Firerunner (01-28-2019)