Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.
View Poll Results: Would you buy a 5cyl in the new F150?
Yes I would!
26
21.49%
Possibly, but I would need much more convincing
32
26.45%
No way!
63
52.07%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?

Old 03-23-2013, 10:32 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up

Torque gets you going, horsepower keeps you going. With low horsepower and higher torque, you're always playing the catch up game. I know, I drove many diesel trucks over the years pulling all kinds of trailers. F350s, F450s, Ford L8000s, International 4700/4900 series trucks. It's always a race to hills to get the speed up, so you don't slow to much before making it to the top.

Now we were talking about a 3.2L so it would have a very low horsepower, lower than the 2008 Explorer 4.0L V6.

While the 6.7L for a light duty truck puts out gobs of horsepower, it, along with it's competition, are unreliable next to gas engines, with huge repair bills. Not saying they are all unreliable but when you actually go to rv.net and see nothing but diesel repair troubles, it really leaves a sour taste in your mouth. I know our family has seen enough problems with the work trucks.

Maybe if your live out in the country, gas stations may all carry diesel but not in the suburbs.

We tow horses. We done fine in both gas and diesel. But then again when pulling 8 or more horses, it's for the business not personal.
More kool-aid please!
Old 03-23-2013, 11:58 AM
  #62  
Iowa Farmer
 
Hunttman01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 30,338
Received 213 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Up

Torque gets you going, horsepower keeps you going. With low horsepower and higher torque, you're always playing the catch up game. I know, I drove many diesel trucks over the years pulling all kinds of trailers. F350s, F450s, Ford L8000s, International 4700/4900 series trucks. It's always a race to hills to get the speed up, so you don't slow to much before making it to the top.

Now we were talking about a 3.2L so it would have a very low horsepower, lower than the 2008 Explorer 4.0L V6.

While the 6.7L for a light duty truck puts out gobs of horsepower, it, along with it's competition, are unreliable next to gas engines, with huge repair bills. Not saying they are all unreliable but when you actually go to rv.net and see nothing but diesel repair troubles, it really leaves a sour taste in your mouth. I know our family has seen enough problems with the work trucks.

Maybe if your live out in the country, gas stations may all carry diesel but not in the suburbs.

We tow horses. We done fine in both gas and diesel. But then again when pulling 8 or more horses, it's for the business not personal.
You see complaints cuz the people who don't have problems don't talk about em.
Old 03-24-2013, 04:32 PM
  #63  
Member
 
hatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 36
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joewee3.5
The US is slow to accept the Inline engines. The I6 and I5 that Chevy used were nice engines but didn't take off. If there were a way to dpf delete this I5, do injectors, big turbo and tune and it would blow an EB off the road. Yeah it might sound different but all you'd really hear would be a jet engine turbo shooting by.
The US has bought 10s of millions of I6 engines. Only problem is I6s don't fit in modern vehicles like v6 or v8. And have the base engine stigma. But that's likely changing since v6 engines are so premium these days. I'd take a nice modern turbo I6 F150.
Old 03-24-2013, 05:55 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Did someone already post that the us version of this engine only makes 97hp and 347 ftlb?
Old 03-24-2013, 08:21 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
ThreeOhTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 117
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hatt
The US has bought 10s of millions of I6 engines. Only problem is I6s don't fit in modern vehicles like v6 or v8. And have the base engine stigma. But that's likely changing since v6 engines are so premium these days. I'd take a nice modern turbo I6 F150.
The 300 cid I6 was one of Ford's best truck engines- lots of low-end torque (for its displacement) and it was an extremely reliable engine. That's why Ford kept it around for 30+ years and only got rid of it with the 10th generation F-150 being unable to handle its length. I would welcome a slightly longer hood F-150 to hold a nice 4-5 liter I6 updated with modern niceties like crossflow heads, a DOHC valvetrain, and the option of a turbo.
Old 03-24-2013, 08:55 PM
  #66  
Senior Member
 
linkin_park_453's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 369
Received 61 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Exactly me too who wants to rev a motor sky high in a truck
Old 03-24-2013, 09:13 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ThreeOhTwo
... nice 4-5 liter I6 updated with modern niceties like crossflow heads, a DOHC valvetrain, and the option of a turbo.
Are you familiar with the ford barra i6? It's a dohc 4 liter turbocharged inline 6 manufactured and sold in Australia. How is 416 hp/417 ftlb? I sometimes wonder why the eb was developed from scratch instead of just using the barra. Plus, the barra has been proven durable at power levels much higher than stock and it fits under the hood of a car.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_...gine#section_1

Last edited by engineermike; 03-24-2013 at 09:17 PM.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:30 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
ThreeOhTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 117
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Are you familiar with the ford barra i6? It's a dohc 4 liter turbocharged inline 6 manufactured and sold in Australia. How is 416 hp/417 ftlb? I sometimes wonder why the eb was developed from scratch instead of just using the barra. Plus, the barra has been proven durable at power levels much higher than stock.
I know of that engine's existence; it is essentially is the "little" 240 cid Ford I6 with modern features like twin cams and a turbo. The EcoBoost isn't developed from scratch as it is essentially a 3.5 L Hurricane V6 with turbochargers attached. The 3.5/3.7 L Hurricane V6 is a slight update to the 2.5 L and 3.0 L Duratec V6s which hail from the 1990s. The Barra I6 probably doesn't fit as well in Taurus SHO, Explorer Sport, Lincoln MKS and MKT, and Ford Flex- the other non-F150 places that the blown 3.5 is used.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:40 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
TwinTurboFx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,249
Received 117 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

I have driven a transit with the 3.2l power stroke and it's pretty good. The ecoboost is more powerful but the diesel gets a lot better mileage.
Old 03-25-2013, 02:04 PM
  #70  
Junior Member
 
rbisch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboFx4
I have driven a transit with the 3.2l power stroke and it's pretty good. The ecoboost is more powerful but the diesel gets a lot better mileage.
Curious where you drove the Transit van with the I-5 diesel and any information regarding the most suitable engine choice for work and economy.

I am planning to purchase a Transit Van 148" wheelbase, 100.8" roof height, 10,300 lb GVW with a 4x4 conversion. The van will be loaded with at least 1500 lbs equipment 100% of the time.

Thanks for any and all information.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.