View Poll Results: Would you buy a 5cyl in the new F150?
Yes I would!
26
21.49%
Possibly, but I would need much more convincing
32
26.45%
No way!
63
52.07%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll
Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?
#61
Senior Member
Torque gets you going, horsepower keeps you going. With low horsepower and higher torque, you're always playing the catch up game. I know, I drove many diesel trucks over the years pulling all kinds of trailers. F350s, F450s, Ford L8000s, International 4700/4900 series trucks. It's always a race to hills to get the speed up, so you don't slow to much before making it to the top.
Now we were talking about a 3.2L so it would have a very low horsepower, lower than the 2008 Explorer 4.0L V6.
While the 6.7L for a light duty truck puts out gobs of horsepower, it, along with it's competition, are unreliable next to gas engines, with huge repair bills. Not saying they are all unreliable but when you actually go to rv.net and see nothing but diesel repair troubles, it really leaves a sour taste in your mouth. I know our family has seen enough problems with the work trucks.
Maybe if your live out in the country, gas stations may all carry diesel but not in the suburbs.
We tow horses. We done fine in both gas and diesel. But then again when pulling 8 or more horses, it's for the business not personal.
#62
Iowa Farmer
Torque gets you going, horsepower keeps you going. With low horsepower and higher torque, you're always playing the catch up game. I know, I drove many diesel trucks over the years pulling all kinds of trailers. F350s, F450s, Ford L8000s, International 4700/4900 series trucks. It's always a race to hills to get the speed up, so you don't slow to much before making it to the top.
Now we were talking about a 3.2L so it would have a very low horsepower, lower than the 2008 Explorer 4.0L V6.
While the 6.7L for a light duty truck puts out gobs of horsepower, it, along with it's competition, are unreliable next to gas engines, with huge repair bills. Not saying they are all unreliable but when you actually go to rv.net and see nothing but diesel repair troubles, it really leaves a sour taste in your mouth. I know our family has seen enough problems with the work trucks.
Maybe if your live out in the country, gas stations may all carry diesel but not in the suburbs.
We tow horses. We done fine in both gas and diesel. But then again when pulling 8 or more horses, it's for the business not personal.
#63
The US is slow to accept the Inline engines. The I6 and I5 that Chevy used were nice engines but didn't take off. If there were a way to dpf delete this I5, do injectors, big turbo and tune and it would blow an EB off the road. Yeah it might sound different but all you'd really hear would be a jet engine turbo shooting by.
#65
The 300 cid I6 was one of Ford's best truck engines- lots of low-end torque (for its displacement) and it was an extremely reliable engine. That's why Ford kept it around for 30+ years and only got rid of it with the 10th generation F-150 being unable to handle its length. I would welcome a slightly longer hood F-150 to hold a nice 4-5 liter I6 updated with modern niceties like crossflow heads, a DOHC valvetrain, and the option of a turbo.
#67
Senior Member
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_...gine#section_1
Last edited by engineermike; 03-24-2013 at 09:17 PM.
#68
Are you familiar with the ford barra i6? It's a dohc 4 liter turbocharged inline 6 manufactured and sold in Australia. How is 416 hp/417 ftlb? I sometimes wonder why the eb was developed from scratch instead of just using the barra. Plus, the barra has been proven durable at power levels much higher than stock.
#69
I have driven a transit with the 3.2l power stroke and it's pretty good. The ecoboost is more powerful but the diesel gets a lot better mileage.
#70
I am planning to purchase a Transit Van 148" wheelbase, 100.8" roof height, 10,300 lb GVW with a 4x4 conversion. The van will be loaded with at least 1500 lbs equipment 100% of the time.
Thanks for any and all information.