View Poll Results: Would you buy a 5cyl in the new F150?
Yes I would!
26
21.49%
Possibly, but I would need much more convincing
32
26.45%
No way!
63
52.07%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll
Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?
#21
Beer Gut Extraordinaire
No...I thought we were done with 5 cyl. engines. Hate em'! Like a previous member said...Not the power of a 6 cyl or efficiency of a 4 cyl. They sound terrible too. Drove a rental Jetta with a 5 cylinder and I hated it.
#22
Iowa Farmer
No way. For a few reasons
1. I don't plan on buying a brand new truck anytime soon
2. Id rather have a v6 over an i5
3. It'll sound like crap
1. I don't plan on buying a brand new truck anytime soon
2. Id rather have a v6 over an i5
3. It'll sound like crap
#24
Senior Member
Rather then introduce the I5 to the F150, I think Ford could keep the same lineup but drop the 6.2L for the 4.4L TT diesel. The 6.2 already has a huge price markup, so that makes up most of the upfront cost of diesel plus it is offered as the premium engine. It makes sense, an engine with all the towing power of the 3.5/6.2 gassers but with better mpg potential both empty and while towing. By dropping the gas guzzling 6.2L and using the 4.4L as the premium engine, it would help Ford hit the required CAFE numbers as well...especially if lots of people buy into the 4.4L (which would be likely).
#25
Senior Member
Before moving to Canada, we lived in the UK and one of the cars I had was a Passat V5 - basicaly a VR6 engine with a cylinder cut off. The sound was great, the power wasn't bad but economy was my reason for getting rid of it. Very poor.
Funnily enough, it was replaced by a Vauxhall Corsa (think Ford Fiesta size) which has a 1.0L 3cyl engine. Now that had a nice, offbeat sound, if not quite as much get up and go. Economy was good though...
When I used to lift the hood to show people, they looked, looked again and asked where the rest of it was. 'Well there's the alternator, where's the engine?'
Edit: I voted maybe in the poll. How many of you would have said 'hell no' 8 years back to a 3.5L turbo'd V6 in a full size truck. Technology moves on.
Funnily enough, it was replaced by a Vauxhall Corsa (think Ford Fiesta size) which has a 1.0L 3cyl engine. Now that had a nice, offbeat sound, if not quite as much get up and go. Economy was good though...
When I used to lift the hood to show people, they looked, looked again and asked where the rest of it was. 'Well there's the alternator, where's the engine?'
Edit: I voted maybe in the poll. How many of you would have said 'hell no' 8 years back to a 3.5L turbo'd V6 in a full size truck. Technology moves on.
Last edited by rob28; 01-14-2013 at 07:04 PM. Reason: Added my poll reasoning
#27
The US is slow to accept the Inline engines. The I6 and I5 that Chevy used were nice engines but didn't take off. If there were a way to dpf delete this I5, do injectors, big turbo and tune and it would blow an EB off the road. Yeah it might sound different but all you'd really hear would be a jet engine turbo shooting by.
#28
Senior Member
If the OP would have mentioned this in the opening post in this thread than the opinions may have been completely different. My opinion was based on an N/A I5 because I didn't see the words turbo or diesel mentioned in the original post in this thread.
#29
I would say yes if it employed the same technology as the ecoboost. Inline engines have a more truck like power graph, and I think it would be completely capable of 3.5 ecoboost power figures. Inline engines are much stronger in nature too. In a 700lb lighter f150 I'd take a 350hp/420~tq 5 cylinder in a heartbeat.
#30
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yes I admit I was not aware that it was a TD when I posted the thread, I will go back and make an edit, sorry about that guys