Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.
View Poll Results: Would you buy a 5cyl in the new F150?
Yes I would!
26
21.49%
Possibly, but I would need much more convincing
32
26.45%
No way!
63
52.07%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2013, 06:29 PM
  #21  
Beer Gut Extraordinaire

 
HCFX2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,369
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,317 Posts

Default

No...I thought we were done with 5 cyl. engines. Hate em'! Like a previous member said...Not the power of a 6 cyl or efficiency of a 4 cyl. They sound terrible too. Drove a rental Jetta with a 5 cylinder and I hated it.
Old 01-14-2013, 06:30 PM
  #22  
Iowa Farmer
 
Hunttman01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 30,338
Received 213 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

No way. For a few reasons


1. I don't plan on buying a brand new truck anytime soon

2. Id rather have a v6 over an i5

3. It'll sound like crap
Old 01-14-2013, 06:34 PM
  #23  
Member
 
gregt909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 91
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Odd number cylinders just don't make sence. Give me 4 or give me 6.
Old 01-14-2013, 06:50 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
mSaLL150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 976
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Rather then introduce the I5 to the F150, I think Ford could keep the same lineup but drop the 6.2L for the 4.4L TT diesel. The 6.2 already has a huge price markup, so that makes up most of the upfront cost of diesel plus it is offered as the premium engine. It makes sense, an engine with all the towing power of the 3.5/6.2 gassers but with better mpg potential both empty and while towing. By dropping the gas guzzling 6.2L and using the 4.4L as the premium engine, it would help Ford hit the required CAFE numbers as well...especially if lots of people buy into the 4.4L (which would be likely).

Old 01-14-2013, 07:00 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
rob28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northwest Ontario - in the Wilderness..
Posts: 439
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Before moving to Canada, we lived in the UK and one of the cars I had was a Passat V5 - basicaly a VR6 engine with a cylinder cut off. The sound was great, the power wasn't bad but economy was my reason for getting rid of it. Very poor.

Funnily enough, it was replaced by a Vauxhall Corsa (think Ford Fiesta size) which has a 1.0L 3cyl engine. Now that had a nice, offbeat sound, if not quite as much get up and go. Economy was good though...
When I used to lift the hood to show people, they looked, looked again and asked where the rest of it was. 'Well there's the alternator, where's the engine?'

Edit: I voted maybe in the poll. How many of you would have said 'hell no' 8 years back to a 3.5L turbo'd V6 in a full size truck. Technology moves on.

Last edited by rob28; 01-14-2013 at 07:04 PM. Reason: Added my poll reasoning
Old 01-14-2013, 07:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joewee3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,831
Received 179 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

I'd take the 4.4 tt diesel all day long. I would trade my truck in the day that engine hit the lot.
Old 01-14-2013, 07:51 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Centexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,398
Received 130 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joewee3.5
The US is slow to accept the Inline engines. The I6 and I5 that Chevy used were nice engines but didn't take off. If there were a way to dpf delete this I5, do injectors, big turbo and tune and it would blow an EB off the road. Yeah it might sound different but all you'd really hear would be a jet engine turbo shooting by.
And this thread proves it.
Old 01-14-2013, 08:42 PM
  #28  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,928 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Joewee3.5
It's a TURBO diesel geez. It's not a NA I5. Nothing like the I5 that GM put in the canyon/Colorado/h3. 200hp/350tq.
If the OP would have mentioned this in the opening post in this thread than the opinions may have been completely different. My opinion was based on an N/A I5 because I didn't see the words turbo or diesel mentioned in the original post in this thread.
Old 01-14-2013, 08:44 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
borjeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 736
Received 29 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

I would say yes if it employed the same technology as the ecoboost. Inline engines have a more truck like power graph, and I think it would be completely capable of 3.5 ecoboost power figures. Inline engines are much stronger in nature too. In a 700lb lighter f150 I'd take a 350hp/420~tq 5 cylinder in a heartbeat.
Old 01-15-2013, 08:13 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
CDC5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 823
Received 75 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NASSTY
If the OP would have mentioned this in the opening post in this thread than the opinions may have been completely different. My opinion was based on an N/A I5 because I didn't see the words turbo or diesel mentioned in the original post in this thread.

Yes I admit I was not aware that it was a TD when I posted the thread, I will go back and make an edit, sorry about that guys


Quick Reply: Would You Buy a 5cyl in the New F150?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.