Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Weird Fuel Trim Readings - LOW LTFT Bank 1??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2015, 12:30 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ajack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Weird Fuel Trim Readings - LOW LTFT Bank 1??

Truck: 2011 FX4 Ecoboost w/ 37K miles

I'm getting a consistently lower long term fuel trim on bank 1 reading on my torque scanner. Bank 1 consistently reads about -15% while bank 2 reads about -7%.

From what I understand negative fuel trim numbers mean it's running rich and the computer is giving the motor less fuel via the injectors on that bank. A consistently -15% bank1 seems off to me especially since it's nearly always double bank 2. I mentioned this to my dealership and they don't seem to care if it's not throwing a code. I'm just looking to get on top of an issue if one does indeed exist. Both cats read the same temps and I've changed my plugs. I get about 13.5 MPG city. I'm wondering if this could be a fuel in the oil or PCV issue maybe?

Is there a reason these motors would show these readings under normal conditions or should I begin digging deeper and press the issue with the dealership?
Old 04-01-2015, 11:50 AM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ajack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Bump for thoughts? Anyone else check their fuel trims lately?
Old 04-01-2015, 08:07 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
BucketMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,219
Received 387 Likes on 274 Posts

Default

Do you smell fuel in the oil, even more so than what's expected with a DI engine?

Can you monitor A/F ratio?

Some have reported engine failure due to a stuck injector flooding a cylinder. Any rough running or misfire issues?
Old 04-01-2015, 09:50 PM
  #4  
Member
 
t76mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajack
Bump for thoughts? Anyone else check their fuel trims lately?
Any p codes? if not then I wouldnt worry about it.
Old 04-02-2015, 10:05 AM
  #5  
Member
 
woody3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajack
Truck: 2011 FX4 Ecoboost w/ 37K miles

I'm getting a consistently lower long term fuel trim on bank 1 reading on my torque scanner. Bank 1 consistently reads about -15% while bank 2 reads about -7%.

From what I understand negative fuel trim numbers mean it's running rich and the computer is giving the motor less fuel via the injectors on that bank. A consistently -15% bank1 seems off to me especially since it's nearly always double bank 2. I mentioned this to my dealership and they don't seem to care if it's not throwing a code. I'm just looking to get on top of an issue if one does indeed exist. Both cats read the same temps and I've changed my plugs. I get about 13.5 MPG city. I'm wondering if this could be a fuel in the oil or PCV issue maybe?

Is there a reason these motors would show these readings under normal conditions or should I begin digging deeper and press the issue with the dealership?

There is a serious "community wide" misunderstanding regarding the condensation issue. It exhibits at times other than those that result in a CEL or even the feeling of the engine "bogging" down.



The base cause for condensation is the fact that there is a pressure drop between the CAC inflow and outflow plumbing, even at moderate cruise levels. The longer you cruise without enough throttle opening to "wash" the condensate into the intake manifold the more it is that a CEL will result once you go "WOT"


But what about the times post a shorter cruise period with high Rh when you go into acceleration and there is maybe only a "Teaspoon" of water in the CAC outflow plumbing?


Not enough to cause a misfire but with a high likelihood of extra oxygen content reaching the A/F mixture sensor.


Water = H2O, vaporizes, 1-3% molecular separation under the pressure and heat of combustion, the A/F mixture sensor detects unburned oxygen in he exhaust flow and adjusts, enriches, the long term fuel trim accordingly.

Last edited by woody3; 04-02-2015 at 10:34 AM.
Old 04-02-2015, 12:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
maplelakeduckslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Albertville, MN
Posts: 1,521
Received 196 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

I dunno I'd say -15 is a ways off, mine are both around -7 to -6. I'd clean your MAP sensors and IC and see if anything changes. And pull plugs again to check and make sure they are fine.
Old 04-02-2015, 01:35 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ajack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maplelakeduckslayer
I dunno I'd say -15 is a ways off, mine are both around -7 to -6. I'd clean your MAP sensors and IC and see if anything changes. And pull plugs again to check and make sure they are fine.
I just changed the plugs. Not change yet to the LTFT but it's only been a couple hundred miles. The old ones had big gaps but I wasn't getting any misfires. If the MAP were dirty would that effect both banks rather than just one side? And if it were an intercooler(CAC)/condensation issue again wouldn't that effect both sides?

Trending Topics

Old 04-02-2015, 03:52 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
bignfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 224
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

My first guess would be the o2 sensor for that bank then if that wasnt the issue i would look at the injectors, both banks should read somewhat close. With negative fuel trims the pcm thinks there is a lean condition and is adding fuel to correct. If the o2 sensor is fouled, faulty, ect. It may be adding fuel for no reason (causing an actual rich condition) this could have a negative affect on fuel mileage.
Old 04-14-2015, 03:55 PM
  #9  
s_vares
 
s_vares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 780
Received 430 Likes on 84 Posts

Default

Interesting...

Subscribed.
Old 04-15-2015, 10:03 AM
  #10  
Member
 
woody3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajack
I just changed the plugs. Not change yet to the LTFT but it's only been a couple hundred miles. The old ones had big gaps but I wasn't getting any misfires. If the MAP were dirty would that effect both banks rather than just one side? And if it were an intercooler(CAC)/condensation issue again wouldn't that effect both sides?

Only Ford can tell why but one side is predominant insofar as condensation effects.


Quick Reply: Weird Fuel Trim Readings - LOW LTFT Bank 1??



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.