Topic Sponsor
Performance, Tuning, and (LEGAL) Racing Post discussions about increasing performance, capabilities, and racing. ****WARNING**** Street racing or illegal activities will be removed and potential bans will be handed out.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo Upgrades for the ecoboost?

Old 11-09-2012, 06:14 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Iowa City
Posts: 177
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Which one? It takes a lot of power to push 6000 lb to 103 mph in the quarter.
I'm basing it on the 370-380 rwhp I am seeing from these tune/exhaust trucks. 25-26% drivetrain loss seems excessive.

That said, the 600+ lb/ft engine torque probably helps get that big truck to that 100+ mph trap. I just don't see 500 hp there with those tiny turbos.
Old 11-09-2012, 07:47 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vteckiller2000
... those tiny turbos.
According to Full Race, the stock F150 EB turbo's are good for a combined 47 lb/min at choke. That should be good for 500 hp.

And just FYI, I used the basic hp calculation using weight and mph. Keep in mind that the conditions were very good when the 103 mph pass was made.
Old 11-09-2012, 09:08 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
byoungblood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 418
Received 32 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
According to Full Race, the stock F150 EB turbo's are good for a combined 47 lb/min at choke. That should be good for 500 hp.

And just FYI, I used the basic hp calculation using weight and mph. Keep in mind that the conditions were very good when the 103 mph pass was made.
They don't happen to have compressor maps, do they?
Old 11-09-2012, 10:32 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Centexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,398
Received 130 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

500hp/1000ftlbs of torque will propel a 7-8000lb diesel into the high 12s/low 13s. So to make 6000lbs do that wouldn't take THAT much power.
Old 11-09-2012, 10:35 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Centexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,398
Received 130 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
According to Full Race, the stock F150 EB turbo's are good for a combined 47 lb/min at choke. That should be good for 500 hp.

And just FYI, I used the basic hp calculation using weight and mph. Keep in mind that the conditions were very good when the 103 mph pass was made.
I find that what works on paper rarely translates to real life. If the engine was a 100% efficient in using all of that air and fuel then I could see the turbos working but it's not.
Old 11-09-2012, 10:42 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by byoungblood
They don't happen to have compressor maps, do they?
According to Full Race, there is some sort of agreement that the compressor maps not be published. For now, at least.
Old 11-09-2012, 10:49 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Centexguy
I find that what works on paper rarely translates to real life. If the engine was a 100% efficient in using all of that air and fuel then I could see the turbos working but it's not.
I've been turbocharging engines for quite a while and they all start on paper, but later translate to real life. On one of my combo's, the turbo was rated at 90 lb/min at choke but made 940 hp on the dyno. And this was using old school tech, likely not as efficient as the 4-valve vvt DI engine.

If what FR is saying about 47 lb/min at choke is right, then 470 hp would be a conservative estimate. A rule of thumb is actually that 1 lb/min = 10 rwhp, but that generally applies to manual transmission cars with less drivetrain losses.
Old 11-09-2012, 11:38 PM
  #28  
Rasslin
 
mtxpert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 459
Received 122 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

If you have a set of turbos off a car, how hard is it to get compressor maps made up? I'm googling it but must be looking for something wrong.
Old 11-10-2012, 08:56 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtxpert
If you have a set of turbos off a car, how hard is it to get compressor maps made up? I'm googling it but must be looking for something wrong.
Not very easy. You need to be able to hold it at a constant, known shaft speed and measure flow rate, inlet temp, discharge temp, inlet pressure, and discharge pressure. The most difficult part on these would be holding it at a constant, known speed, as they likely spin well over 100,000 rpm.
Old 11-10-2012, 08:40 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Centexguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,398
Received 130 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

Has anyone looked into VGT turbos for these? They've been using them for years on the diesels.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Turbo Upgrades for the ecoboost?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.