Roush cai installed today.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Roush cai installed today.
I installed my ROUSH cai today it was very easy to do, the only real specialized tool needed was a torx bit for maf screws.
Before I installed this I read that others heard a noticeable noise & GROWL sound above 2k rpms...this is no joke it sounds like a monster compared to the stock pipe above 2k rpm.
ROUSH pipe vs. Stock pipe
Stock filter vs. ROUSH filter
ROUSH unit installed.
Pay attention to the filter vs. box orientation or it will rattle..ask me how I know
Before I installed this I read that others heard a noticeable noise & GROWL sound above 2k rpms...this is no joke it sounds like a monster compared to the stock pipe above 2k rpm.
ROUSH pipe vs. Stock pipe
Stock filter vs. ROUSH filter
ROUSH unit installed.
Pay attention to the filter vs. box orientation or it will rattle..ask me how I know
#6
Senior Member
#7
Senior Member
HMMM ... closest I came to measuring was at the track with the Superchips tune which had no CAI option. Then, I bought the 5-Star tune so I could specifically take advantage of my CAI. Ran consistently better times. Other than tune & CAI, the truck was stock everything else.
IMHO for a 100% stock vehicle with stock tune, it only makes common sense to me the MAF would demand the ECU compensate for the added air intake charge and provide better performance.
Would it be measurable on a dyno? Yes if all things were equal, but, not enough to present a winning arguement.
Most of us know all things will never be equal on the same dyno, same day, same calibration, same SAE corrected numbers ... too many variables ... just my .02 cents and I could care less about what anyone thinks about my opinion.
And look how clean the engine bays gets:
IMHO for a 100% stock vehicle with stock tune, it only makes common sense to me the MAF would demand the ECU compensate for the added air intake charge and provide better performance.
Would it be measurable on a dyno? Yes if all things were equal, but, not enough to present a winning arguement.
Most of us know all things will never be equal on the same dyno, same day, same calibration, same SAE corrected numbers ... too many variables ... just my .02 cents and I could care less about what anyone thinks about my opinion.
And look how clean the engine bays gets:
Last edited by jeb99ta; 04-08-2012 at 10:18 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My @$$ dyno says yes there is better throttle response. My on board Avg MPH computer tells me 1-2 mpg better. I can't put a number on it however...3-5-10hp probably not 10hp.
To me the real test would be a before and after at the drag strip, as mentioned there are too many variables in Dyno testing.
I can say this for sure....The ROUSH CAI coupled with the ROUSH cat-back make the truck more "fun" to drive. IMHO- these parts are worth it.
To me the real test would be a before and after at the drag strip, as mentioned there are too many variables in Dyno testing.
I can say this for sure....The ROUSH CAI coupled with the ROUSH cat-back make the truck more "fun" to drive. IMHO- these parts are worth it.
#9
Senior Member
All-in-all, the cam would be the restriction, eventually, but, not with just a CAI and exhaust. The throttle reponse is incredibly better ... snappy, crisp, and way better. I don't think too many people would argue that point. That's def a great feeling and the first thing you notice when making the switch from stock.
The CAI adds little power by itself, but, I am one of believers that it's prob 5 RWHP & 3-4 RWTQ. The gain is there, but, this has been argue'd since the inception of the CAI. It's subjective to the driver.
The CAI adds little power by itself, but, I am one of believers that it's prob 5 RWHP & 3-4 RWTQ. The gain is there, but, this has been argue'd since the inception of the CAI. It's subjective to the driver.