Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2012, 02:02 PM
  #11  
Five-0 Ret.
 
Wanted33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Down South in Dixie
Posts: 5,726
Received 674 Likes on 578 Posts

Default

Jeb, the ecoer's are gonna get you....................
Old 02-20-2012, 02:17 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Pacific Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 523
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

The articles conclusions do not surprise me a bit.
Scared of new technology, no way. The 5.0 is all aluminum, coil over ignition, double overhead cams etc.

I do not think the Ecoboost owners need to be scared of new technology either until they reach the mileage point they have to replace the twin turbos and heat management systems and or engine. What mileage point that is remains to be seen. But look under the hood of a 5.0 and see what a breeze it will be to service major components and even swap out a whole engine.
That is what gives me a lot of comfort about the 5.0 in addition to all of its technology.
Old 02-20-2012, 02:36 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
kyle450rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jenks,OK
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pacific Fisher
The articles conclusions do not surprise me a bit.
Scared of new technology, no way. The 5.0 is all aluminum, coil over ignition, double overhead cams etc.

I do not think the Ecoboost owners need to be scared of new technology either until they reach the mileage point they have to replace the twin turbos and heat management systems and or engine. What mileage point that is remains to be seen. But look under the hood of a 5.0 and see what a breeze it will be to service major components and even swap out a whole engine.
That is what gives me a lot of comfort about the 5.0 in addition to all of its technology.
I really like how you summed that up. Makes a lot of sense. I'm going to be in the market and just started a thread about reviews on both engines. I read a few pieces on the new engines and I'll see if I can find it again but it said Ford fudged the output numbers on both the eco and the coyote. They actually put out more horsepower than stated. Anybody know if this is indeed true? I think it was moter trend where I read that according to the rear wheel HP on the dyno the Eco was actually closer to 380HP. Not sure about the V-8.
Old 02-20-2012, 02:38 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
BlueOval84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 440
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

My gosh some of these EB owners sure are sensitive and quick to point out that their engine is better. All because of a silly article!
Old 02-20-2012, 03:45 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
mechanicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 270 Likes on 191 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gimmie11s
Old news.............

Sounds like you bought the truck that fits you though, so thats good.

I bought my truck for 2 reasons:
1. the ability to tow 10k+ pounds (i have a toybox that weighs 11k loaded).
2. the performance of the 6.2 with the mpg of the 3.7...almost.


Those 2 reasons are DAMN impressive to say the least and although i think the 5.0 is an AWESOME motor in the Mustang... i cannot see why people buy it in the F150 when they have the 6.2 and EcoB as choices.......... seriously cannot see why.


Other than sound cool, the 5.0 does absolutely NOTHING better than the ECO in stock form.

Flame on
Other than coast about $2000 less(than the eco), while getting the same fuel economy. The 6.2 is only available in the top trims which pushes the price even higher. From what aaa tells me the ecoboost has negligibly higher insurance premiums. I guess people are beating up those intercoolers That guy may not have known what he was talking about.

For those worried about the reliability I don't know why they always talk about the turbos. Yes they can cook, and maybe some have on the eco(so I was told but haven't seen) but for the most part they are reliable if you don't beat them when they're cold and let them cool after you've been working them hard before shutting the engine off. I would be more concerned about the DI system as those parts are expensive! On the other hand they are getting better all the time and I'm sure the 5.0 will be DI sooner rather than later so I'm hoping it's a reliable system.
Old 02-20-2012, 04:13 PM
  #16  
Boost :)
 
TJPlatinumEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,329
Received 440 Likes on 328 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Pacific Fisher
The articles conclusions do not surprise me a bit.
Scared of new technology, no way. The 5.0 is all aluminum, coil over ignition, double overhead cams etc.

I do not think the Ecoboost owners need to be scared of new technology either until they reach the mileage point they have to replace the twin turbos and heat management systems and or engine. What mileage point that is remains to be seen. But look under the hood of a 5.0 and see what a breeze it will be to service major components and even swap out a whole engine.
That is what gives me a lot of comfort about the 5.0 in addition to all of its technology.
I wasn't going to post anything in this thread and was just reading the responses and then unfortunately came to this gem and it is just laughable at best.

1. You think all aluminum, DOHC, COP ignition is new technology? Really? I'm not even sure where to start with that one. It's not new!

2. Someone's always gotta bring in the turbo argument. Oh no the turbos are gonna blow?!?!?!? Fact is, if you knew ANYTHING about turbos, you would know they are extremely reliable and can last hundreds of thousands of miles. A brand new turbo from Ford costs about $600 bucks and you can have ANY turbo rebuilt completely at any turbo shop for under $500. That's a chance I will happily take.

3. See what a breeze the 5.0 will be to remove? You do realize the EB has 2 LESS cylinders and has more room in the engine bay to workaround right? And if you have ever taken a motor out of any vehicle, having more room up front (i.e. fewer cylinders) with something that fits between the frame rails backed by the same transmission is actually going to be EASIER to take out if that happens. However, you seem to think the EB will throw its turbos on the ground and blow the heads through the hood before it hits 100k so logic clearly escapes you in that regard.

Both are fantastic engines and both will last plenty long and be very durable and reliable for years to come. Each of them has reasons they are better than the other and both appeal to different folks. But to say one will blow up and turbos will will go and engine will go is just a freakin joke. Come on.
Old 02-20-2012, 04:24 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,928 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Doing an engine swap on a 5.0 is so easy a caveman can do it.
Old 02-20-2012, 05:42 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
jeb99ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Coming to a theater near you ...
Posts: 852
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wanted33
Jeb, the ecoer's are gonna get you....................

LOL! Yeah, I'll be having bad dreams about those, especially when Boss5.0 just ran a 13.09 1/4-mile time with Mustang shorties, CAI and exhaust and a tune.

I just hope they don't come after me in my dreams. The dragstrip will be the place they can find me

Any takers in Florida wanna. meet up on Sunday March 4th at Bithlo? Here's a vid link of my run in 4WD ... lol!!! I had toolbox loaded, tailgate, and spare wheel/tire. Hemi was missing these items and was a 2WD. Bring on the eco's boys.

Old 02-20-2012, 06:03 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
SICKQK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Tuxedo NY
Posts: 182
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jeb99ta
LOL! Yeah, I'll be having bad dreams about those, especially when Boss5.0 just ran a 13.09 1/4-mile time with Mustang shorties, CAI and exhaust and a tune.

I just hope they don't come after me in my dreams. The dragstrip will be the place they can find me

Any takers in Florida wanna. meet up on Sunday March 4th at Bithlo? Here's a vid link of my run in 4WD ... lol!!! I had toolbox loaded, tailgate, and spare wheel/tire. Hemi was missing these items and was a 2WD. Bring on the eco's boys.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRNVIV8fEL4
Did you just post a video of you losing a race to a Hemi? LOL

Last edited by SICKQK; 02-20-2012 at 06:30 PM.
Old 02-20-2012, 06:19 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
MadocHandyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madoc, Ontario
Posts: 5,800
Received 277 Likes on 193 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jeb99ta

LOL! Yeah, I'll be having bad dreams about those, especially when Boss5.0 just ran a 13.09 1/4-mile time with Mustang shorties, CAI and exhaust and a tune.
Is this going to turn into another modded 5.0 vs stock Eco thread?

Subscribed!!!


Quick Reply: Road Test Review: 2011 Ford F-150 XLT 5.0-liter V-8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM.