Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Pulled my EB intake swirly vane things

Old 12-30-2015, 10:35 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dave91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kenna, WV
Posts: 591
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts

Default Pulled my EB intake swirly vane things

2014 EB.
Did it out of curiosity. So far, no real earth shattering change. I hear a bit more whistle and it just could be I feel a bit smoother acceleration.
No real point in the post other than to say I tried it. I read the gazillion thread posts on a forum and it turned into a hot mess. Can't remember the forum. But, I will run it like this for awhile. Took 5 minutes to pull them.
Old 12-30-2015, 11:37 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Tremble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 12
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh no, you removed the flux capacitor.
Old 12-31-2015, 10:51 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Gremlin85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 252
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tremble
Oh no, you removed the flux capacitor.
Oh great, now he'll end up like this guy...

http://www.motortrend.com/news/flori...o-time-travel/


Old 12-31-2015, 11:15 AM
  #4  
King Hater
 
Tothemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MONTANA
Posts: 6,973
Received 872 Likes on 653 Posts

Default

I removed mine for a bit. No noticeable change. I ended up putting them back in after reading the post from the guy who designed them. There is a reason they are in there and a lot smarter guys than me designed them to do things Ill never know.
The following users liked this post:
MGD (12-31-2015)
Old 01-02-2016, 06:15 PM
  #5  
Member
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 93
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tothemax
I removed mine for a bit. No noticeable change. I ended up putting them back in after reading the post from the guy who designed them. There is a reason they are in there and a lot smarter guys than me designed them to do things Ill never know.
Gotta link to this? I'm curious to read about their design intent.
Old 01-02-2016, 10:33 PM
  #6  
King Hater
 
Tothemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MONTANA
Posts: 6,973
Received 872 Likes on 653 Posts

Default

I'll see if I can find it again. It was buried in a big thread
Old 01-03-2016, 10:22 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dave91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kenna, WV
Posts: 591
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

I read a lot of interesting information on them. The debate was noise suppression vs. airflow. I'm not smart enough to debate it so I pulled them for an unscientific test. In my uneducated opinion, any restriction in the inlet stream is not desirable. Turbos in a race car, or even in my old 7.3 diesel, are connected directly to a filter through an open inlet. The oxygen sensors adjust the AF to accommodate any minor changes.
In my unscientific test, I noticed slightly smoother acceleration and more whistle. Mpg hasn't changed. I'll run it for a bit longer.
Old 01-03-2016, 12:06 PM
  #8  
King Hater
 
Tothemax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: MONTANA
Posts: 6,973
Received 872 Likes on 653 Posts

Default

Found it: https://www.f150forum.com/f70/ecoboo...4/#post4065629

Post # 392

I work for a company that produces these blow molded turbo ducts for both the 2.7L and 3.5L TT engines. We also assemble the swirl vanes as part of the sub-assembly provided to FORD (tier 1) among other welded bellow and cuffs to them. I was the production engineer that worked directly with FORD Dearborn. The swirl vanes in question are injection molded product. The ridges are used to de-mould the product out of the tool. The newer vanes lack these because of the parting line associated with de-moulding has changed.
The vanes purpose are for NVH prevention. "Noise Vibration Harmonics". That means they will quiet the air stream by creating a air pre-swirl condition to the turbo impeller. They also provide a minor increase in spool time at lower RPM ranges during initial acceleration. In addition reduce the turbulance on the incoming air (K coefficient).
The following 5 users liked this post by Tothemax:
BShaggy (01-05-2016), dave91gt (01-05-2016), MCDavis (01-03-2016), Sirikenewtron (01-05-2016), Smokin Joe (01-05-2016)
Old 01-05-2016, 11:17 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Smokin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 93
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Thanks! That's good to know.
Old 01-05-2016, 02:44 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
sigma pi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,335
Received 328 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

They are for noise, sweet sweet turbo noise. I took them out and left them out.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Pulled my EB intake swirly vane things



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.