Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

New Member, EB bad gas mpg

Old Oct 12, 2012 | 06:32 PM
  #11  
brucesears's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 834
Likes: 130
From: Western Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by sluggo1
An average of 27mpg? Come on! No way
He lives in Maryland, when I was there this summer the speed limit everwhere I went was 55. Mine would probably get that mpg if I only drove 55-glad I don't have to.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
iFord's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 163
From: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Default

New truck, city driving, 12 mpg is fine I think. It will improve some, but remember, city driving means 0 mpg quite often.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #13  
dodgehemi0's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 814
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I call
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #14  
dodgehemi0's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 814
Likes: 149
Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I call BS.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #15  
bignfast's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Likes: 26
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by brucesears

He lives in Maryland, when I was there this summer the speed limit everwhere I went was 55. Mine would probably get that mpg if I only drove 55-glad I don't have to.
I normally avg 20-21 on the hwy but on my way home from florida I was in traffic on a 2 lane hwy stuck going about 55. I had just filled up with gas and reset the trip computer and it showed I was at 27.x mpg by the time I got to the interstate. ( about 45 miles). Lifetime avg is 17.5
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 08:39 PM
  #16  
MadocHandyman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 277
From: Madoc, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by dodgehemi0

I call BS.
I wouldn't say that. He did say average on the hwy. I've done 26 easy doing around 58 mph on rolling 2 lane hwy.
Drops off fast when you start passing people though ;-)
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
truckerdude's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 329
Likes: 7
Default

Mythbusters study MPG savings of various bed modifications
the Mythbusters examine the following modifications to a truck's bed to see how it affects the truck's MPG:
Tailgate up (control test)
Tailgate down
Hard top tonneau
Mesh tailgate
No tailgate



Here are the results:

WORST: Tailgate down
BEST: Mesh Tailgate (a little more than 5% savings)
All of the rest were relatively the same, and having installed a tonneau recently I can confirm the lack of an MPG boost.


MORAL: If you're buying a tonneau for the sole reason of improving your MPG you're wasting your money. It seems like there's a lot of MPG improvement myths when it comes to vehicles, but this one is especially bad because tonneau-cover MPG improvements seems so intrinsically plausible. The bed just seems like a massive wind catcher!

This also shows that you shouldn't trust any manufacturer's claim on MPG improvement. With the internet, it's trivially easy to verify their claims so spend 15 minutes before spending a few hundred dollars on snake oil. Perfect example for me is the Throttle Body spacer. They supposedly improve MPG, but a quick search on the web told me (for the types of engines in a Dakota) that this really is a big scam.

Oh, and always be skeptical of perfectly nice round numbers! Many tonneaus claim a nice, neat, and perfect 10% improvement. Yeah, right!
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2012 | 09:12 PM
  #18  
reward69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 342
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Gingerman
Heavy foot = low milage. Put up the fuel efficiency gauge, and see the affect of your technique. My mpg had improved with some behavior modification.

Also, I put a tonneau cover on, and it had a shockingly good impact on mpg. Highway driving, I I'm getting an average of 27mpg. Your results may vary, but the covert is paying for itself pretty quick. Bigger impact on highway than surface roads, but the overall average is up by about 10%, which is as advertised.
I hope the 27 is a typo, if not put the crack pipe down!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 07:30 AM
  #19  
Shorestyle031's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 2
Default

thanks for the input, i'm going to wait it out and see what happens
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #20  
jknight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Likes: 9
Default

I have 4500 miles on my truck. The life time mileage is 15.5 mpg. I don't see it getting any better. I'll be happy when I can get rid of this truck.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.