Ford Ecoboost Warning Part 2 My Findings
#1
Ford Ecoboost Warning Part 2 My Findings
As promised here is the follow up with my findings and the fix for the 2.0l Ecoboost I mentioned in the previous video. What it came down to was excessive coking on the backside of the intake valves and by doing a simple 5 minute cleaning the problem was eliminated. Now whether there is also a valve stem seal leak on #2 is yet to be determined.
In conclusion there is a definite issue with carbon and oil coking on the intake valves that needs to be addressed sooner than later by Ford with some kind of a cleaning method. As mentioned in the video if there is anything substantial that comes down the pipe from Ford on how to resolve this issue in the long term I will be sure to let all you Ecoboost owner know.
In conclusion there is a definite issue with carbon and oil coking on the intake valves that needs to be addressed sooner than later by Ford with some kind of a cleaning method. As mentioned in the video if there is anything substantial that comes down the pipe from Ford on how to resolve this issue in the long term I will be sure to let all you Ecoboost owner know.
Last edited by makuloco2000; 05-30-2014 at 12:33 AM.
The following 6 users liked this post by makuloco2000:
BlueFlameMetallicFX4 (06-22-2014),
canddmeyer (05-30-2014),
isthatahemi (06-11-2014),
joedotmac (06-22-2014),
Tothemax (05-30-2014),
and 1 others liked this post.
#2
Thanks for the info Makuloco. That's what I call "a smoking gun". Some comments from the video:
- Oil vapors getting baked on at cylinders (ports) that the PCV dumps into.
- Ford is seeing widespread carbon issues on all EcoBoost model engines.
- Causing misfires and poor running.
- After cleaning, it has never run so smooth.
Catch can anyone?
- Oil vapors getting baked on at cylinders (ports) that the PCV dumps into.
- Ford is seeing widespread carbon issues on all EcoBoost model engines.
- Causing misfires and poor running.
- After cleaning, it has never run so smooth.
Catch can anyone?
#3
Senior Member
Thanks. Very interesting...
I'd also wonder if there is, as you suspect a leaky valve stem seal? Cause that definitely looks nasty considering the EB 3.5 looks so much better at higher miles. I think the PCV hose it part of the issue. On the 3.5 it vents to the intake (generally) rather than directly in front of an intake port.
Makes me wonder if there is something else up with that engine, either design or something else out of tolerances. It would also be interesting to see the data of 3.5 vs 2.0 issues.
I think the idea of running it good and hot for a while is a good thing - I remember reading somewhere, maybe on the VW forums that it helps considerably with their engines (and their engines are prone to a lot of this). Perhaps that's why some don't have issues - a good flogging gets everything nice and hot.
Mak,
Do you see many 3.5's with these issues or does it seem to be mainly the 4 cylinders?
I'd also wonder if there is, as you suspect a leaky valve stem seal? Cause that definitely looks nasty considering the EB 3.5 looks so much better at higher miles. I think the PCV hose it part of the issue. On the 3.5 it vents to the intake (generally) rather than directly in front of an intake port.
Makes me wonder if there is something else up with that engine, either design or something else out of tolerances. It would also be interesting to see the data of 3.5 vs 2.0 issues.
I think the idea of running it good and hot for a while is a good thing - I remember reading somewhere, maybe on the VW forums that it helps considerably with their engines (and their engines are prone to a lot of this). Perhaps that's why some don't have issues - a good flogging gets everything nice and hot.
Mak,
Do you see many 3.5's with these issues or does it seem to be mainly the 4 cylinders?
Last edited by itguy08; 05-30-2014 at 10:19 AM.
#4
So where can a person buy a catch can kit thats got everything needed?
The following users liked this post:
Theocoog (05-30-2014)
#5
Senior Member
First, never doubt a guy named Brian, especially when its spelled correctly with and "i".
Serious question though:
So on the 2.0L eco, cylinders 2 and 3 are most effected. So what would be the cylinders to watch for on the 3.5L? Also, it looks like since cylinder 2, port 1 is so much worse, no contest, would it be reasonable to assume that there might be some other failure specific to that cylinder/port? I agree the PCV dump might be an issue but I don't think that's the whole story to this particular ecoboost.
Full disclosure: my name is also spelled correctly.
Serious question though:
So on the 2.0L eco, cylinders 2 and 3 are most effected. So what would be the cylinders to watch for on the 3.5L? Also, it looks like since cylinder 2, port 1 is so much worse, no contest, would it be reasonable to assume that there might be some other failure specific to that cylinder/port? I agree the PCV dump might be an issue but I don't think that's the whole story to this particular ecoboost.
Full disclosure: my name is also spelled correctly.
#6
King Hater
Interesting.
So what do we do? Pvc reroute? Catch can? Clean the valves every so often?
I have a slight idle Flux at idle. It only does it while the motor is cold. Do you think that's due to this? I also noticed a couple extended crank sessions when it was cold out. - 30.
So what do we do? Pvc reroute? Catch can? Clean the valves every so often?
I have a slight idle Flux at idle. It only does it while the motor is cold. Do you think that's due to this? I also noticed a couple extended crank sessions when it was cold out. - 30.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Missouri Ozarks & Clay Country GA
Posts: 1,545
Received 162 Likes
on
134 Posts
Ok, being a simple knuckahaid (that'd be me), the REAL cause of this is direct injection, right? Not the turbos? That's wha' I'm getting. If so, why doesn't Ford just go with regular injection, wha'ever that's called. Direct injection puts the gasoline directly into the cylinder bypassing the intake, under the valves? Am I right?
Trending Topics
#8
King Hater
Yes, that's how it works.
#9
Thanks. Very interesting...
I'd also wonder if there is, as you suspect a leaky valve stem seal? Cause that definitely looks nasty considering the EB 3.5 looks so much better at higher miles. I think the PCV hose it part of the issue. On the 3.5 it vents to the intake (generally) rather than directly in front of an intake port.
Makes me wonder if there is something else up with that engine, either design or something else out of tolerances. It would also be interesting to see the data of 3.5 vs 2.0 issues.
I think the idea of running it good and hot for a while is a good thing - I remember reading somewhere, maybe on the VW forums that it helps considerably with their engines (and their engines are prone to a lot of this). Perhaps that's why some don't have issues - a good flogging gets everything nice and hot.
Mak,
Do you see many 3.5's with these issues or does it seem to be mainly the 4 cylinders?
I'd also wonder if there is, as you suspect a leaky valve stem seal? Cause that definitely looks nasty considering the EB 3.5 looks so much better at higher miles. I think the PCV hose it part of the issue. On the 3.5 it vents to the intake (generally) rather than directly in front of an intake port.
Makes me wonder if there is something else up with that engine, either design or something else out of tolerances. It would also be interesting to see the data of 3.5 vs 2.0 issues.
I think the idea of running it good and hot for a while is a good thing - I remember reading somewhere, maybe on the VW forums that it helps considerably with their engines (and their engines are prone to a lot of this). Perhaps that's why some don't have issues - a good flogging gets everything nice and hot.
Mak,
Do you see many 3.5's with these issues or does it seem to be mainly the 4 cylinders?
First, never doubt a guy named Brian, especially when its spelled correctly with and "i".
Serious question though:
So on the 2.0L eco, cylinders 2 and 3 are most effected. So what would be the cylinders to watch for on the 3.5L? Also, it looks like since cylinder 2, port 1 is so much worse, no contest, would it be reasonable to assume that there might be some other failure specific to that cylinder/port? I agree the PCV dump might be an issue but I don't think that's the whole story to this particular ecoboost.
Full disclosure: my name is also spelled correctly.
Serious question though:
So on the 2.0L eco, cylinders 2 and 3 are most effected. So what would be the cylinders to watch for on the 3.5L? Also, it looks like since cylinder 2, port 1 is so much worse, no contest, would it be reasonable to assume that there might be some other failure specific to that cylinder/port? I agree the PCV dump might be an issue but I don't think that's the whole story to this particular ecoboost.
Full disclosure: my name is also spelled correctly.
Interesting.
So what do we do? Pvc reroute? Catch can? Clean the valves every so often?
I have a slight idle Flux at idle. It only does it while the motor is cold. Do you think that's due to this? I also noticed a couple extended crank sessions when it was cold out. - 30.
So what do we do? Pvc reroute? Catch can? Clean the valves every so often?
I have a slight idle Flux at idle. It only does it while the motor is cold. Do you think that's due to this? I also noticed a couple extended crank sessions when it was cold out. - 30.
Ok, being a simple knuckahaid (that'd be me), the REAL cause of this is direct injection, right? Not the turbos? That's wha' I'm getting. If so, why doesn't Ford just go with regular injection, wha'ever that's called. Direct injection puts the gasoline directly into the cylinder bypassing the intake, under the valves? Am I right?
#10
King Hater
I would also like to see an oem fix for this problem.
When I mentioned the fluctuating idle and the long start when cold to my dealer, they said it was normal.
When I mentioned the fluctuating idle and the long start when cold to my dealer, they said it was normal.