snobdds

Note that the TSB states this condition affects eco's with excessive oil consumption. You have been preaching your "can" is a fix for engines that are "making" oil because of the lack of proper evacuation and concentrates forming in the oil. Why does ford have a totally different perspective than you? Ford theory makes more sense because if this blow by is ending up on the valves, then the engines should be loosing oil, not making it.

Still have not seen an oil analysis from you to show this "inadequate PVC" system is detrimental to the engine.

papa tiger

Their Walnut blasting with a shop vac attachment for the 15 lbs of mess.

Eco Tuner

Until the crankcase is redesigned to provide evacuation at all times as other PCV systems do (and that cannot take place using a naturally aspirated design on a turbo charged engine where the intake manifold becomes pressurized so evacuation ceases whenever vacuum is not present in the IM to continue evacuation) there can be no solution. This has been proven over and over again by the factories TSB's in the past. Until the PCV system functions to evacuate these vapors as soon as they enter, as most all PCV systems do, all of these band-aides are just than. All to date only try to deal with the oil/water/fuel/sulfuric acid ingestion AFTER these have already accumulated in concentrations in the crankcase as the over 400 with the RX system have attested to. And if it did not correct these issues I think one or two would be here screaming to high Heaven and taking us up on the absolute $ back guarantee that it corrects these issues....and to date, every one states their years of issues are now gone. There is no longer any liquid mix accumulating in the CAC. They no longer have the shudder/misfire issue, and the oil analysis they have been posting all show night and day differences as well as no more "making oil" or oil levels increasing with these compounds.

Along with these now we have the Ford dealers that are offering the same fix that they just concluded the long term testing on to prove or dis-prove the fix works.....and we just finished training the senior tech at Sarasota Ford (Rich) to add to Rhineland in MB Canada (Joe) and Cumberland Ford in KY.

This was a test on several problem prone EB F-150's that had not responded well to any of the TSB's.. and they have now released this to the public and are offering it as a proven solution to the issue covered above. And were training more every week.

itguy08

Congratulations, you have "fixed" less than a tenth of a percent of the Ecoboosts on the road. And that number gets less and less as every day goes by and a bunch of Ecoboosts get sold.

Where can one view these oil analyses that show the improvements? What about the vast majority of Ecoboosts that do not "make oil" or the ones that do that have underlying causes like the rash of HPFP failures we saw this winter? Or the vast major it of Ecoboosts that are shudder free? Or those that are fixed with a simple $40 spark plug change?

You've been touting this "study" for months yet and we have been waiting for the results. Yet there are none....

And it's no wonder dealers are falling for your line, hook, line, and sinker. They see the $$$. Buy your stuff cheap, sell it, sell the installation. I'd do that too - it's what makes BG lots of money with their snake oil. But at least they have tests that "prove" their stuff works.

papa tiger

BMW and a german company have teamed up to configure a walnut blaster with a port fitting so the shop vac scavenges the blast. It wont hurt the motor an cleans the val e an ports real slick. It is available for purchase. Needs the engine port size attachment. As the problems evolve into the 100's of 1000's of vehicles out there shops an yards will get them possibly to handle these.

RaidersScrew

Ford came out with a walnut blaster to take care of carbon deposits back in the early 90's for the 2.3l in the Tempo/Topaz...I used it personally myself at the dealership

Eco Tuner

These work excellent and are now pretty affordable......but the manual brushes have the same result for a bit less. But either work great.

bobkyle2

Guys, Its over. Ignore each other. Or you will be dealt with.This WHOLE forum is tired of it.

Every dang thread is this same old crap. This is your final warning.

Tothemax

Any word on this?

makuloco2000

The valve cover and separator are redesigned parts for sure to try and stop the over consumption yes. Like I said it is not perfect but shows they are well aware of the situation.