Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost quarter mile times and mod's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 10:46 AM
  #901  
Senior Member
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Compared on the same truck on the same day I believe it would indeed do much better. This was one run being compared to numerous runs on numerous trucks at numerous tracks.

The reason I mention the rims is because I have the heavy 20s. I wonder what kind of wheels the 13.6 has? I dropped .4 off my quarter by droping 16lbs in tire weight. Do the same for the wheels and that is another chunk off the quarter time. The srock 20s are 48 lbs I believe.

The 13.6 is again 93 non-cali gas. Its rly hard to get apple-to-apple comparisons, unfortunately.

There are tons of factors. Air temp, himidity, altitude, wheel/tire weight, truck weight, launch, Etc. Etc.

When I finish my tune, with comparable wheel weight to those running 17s and I have had more experience at the track.... we shall see.

Last edited by lanmorga; 06-19-2013 at 11:06 AM.
Old 06-19-2013, 11:06 AM
  #902  
Senior Member
 
Joewee3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,831
Received 179 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

I have 20s, so what. I ran 13.66. Everyone is just comparing the tunes power. I guess that could be done in your Socal tuning thread. I hope you drop weight and move on up the list.
Old 06-19-2013, 11:08 AM
  #903  
Senior Member
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joewee3.5
13.803-13.53= .273. That is a bit more than a whopping tenth. He's only giving you are hard time because you touted the tune so much. The SoCal 93 tune trapped 98 making it like most other 93 tunes. I run full weight and do so knowing my truck is a fatty. When you get into dropping weight and changing rims that doesn't speak to the tunes performance. It just moves you up the ranks. Props for getting the times and posting. I'm ready to see someone run the Livernois v10 tune so it can be praised or bashed.
If livernois used sct I would have tried a long time ago.... Is the new version supposwd to have more power? Or is it driveability changes?
Old 06-19-2013, 11:13 AM
  #904  
Senior Member
 
Joewee3.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,831
Received 179 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Both. Shift points are different under different loads. I hammered it yesterday for the first time since the switch from v2 and it felt noticeably stronger.
The following users liked this post:
lanmorga (06-19-2013)
Old 06-19-2013, 12:05 PM
  #905  
Senior Member
 
K-Dubb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 206
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lanmorga
Compared on the same truck on the same day I believe it would indeed do much better. This was one run being compared to numerous runs on numerous trucks at numerous tracks.

The reason I mention the rims is because I have the heavy 20s. I wonder what kind of wheels the 13.6 has? I dropped .4 off my quarter by droping 16lbs in tire weight. Do the same for the wheels and that is another chunk off the quarter time. The srock 20s are 48 lbs I believe.

The 13.6 is again 93 non-cali gas. Its rly hard to get apple-to-apple comparisons, unfortunately.

There are tons of factors. Air temp, himidity, altitude, wheel/tire weight, truck weight, launch, Etc. Etc.

When I finish my tune, with comparable wheel weight to those running 17s and I have had more experience at the track.... we shall see.
What was the DA? If you don't know give me the track name and date time.
The following users liked this post:
lanmorga (06-19-2013)
Old 06-19-2013, 12:10 PM
  #906  
Senior Member
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-Dubb

What was the DA? If you don't know give me the track name and date time.
Famoso raceway on Friday 06/14
Old 06-19-2013, 12:34 PM
  #907  
Senior Member
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

I correct my "below sea leve"l statement: 635 ft above sea level. In a "valley" so I knew it was low... thought a tad below.
Old 06-19-2013, 03:09 PM
  #908  
better looking than geno
 
CoreyMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 1,373
Received 275 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

I was saying, with practice I'd would run probably 13.7s on your truck. Same. Don't get butt hurt. Its just not worth 250 so odd dollars to run the same thing again. More go fast parts out there.
Old 06-19-2013, 05:33 PM
  #909  
Senior Member
 
NGA PLZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 134
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I'm thinking I can get mid 13 @ 100+. My track prep is good and elevation is 18ft. Truck is 2wd, 3.55, 93v2 (maybe v10), o/r downpipe, airaid, lighter wheels. Last time i brought a truck (tuned and intake only silverado) i trapped 96. This truck feels noticebly faster.

Just need a open track night now
Old 06-19-2013, 05:45 PM
  #910  
Senior Member
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NGA PLZ
I'm thinking I can get mid 13 @ 100+. My track prep is good and elevation is 18ft. Truck is 2wd, 3.55, 93v2 (maybe v10), o/r downpipe, airaid, lighter wheels. Last time i brought a truck (tuned and intake only silverado) i trapped 96. This truck feels noticebly faster.

Just need a open track night now
Get it!

I just found 29lb. Forged matt black wheels for 240 each. That cuts ~19 lbs off each wheel! I dropped .4 with only a 16lb drop. So excited...


Quick Reply: Ecoboost quarter mile times and mod's



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.