Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.
View Poll Results: Ecoboost Owners Only - Please Vote for One Option Only
Rx Dual Valve installed
16
21.05%
Rx Single Valve installed
0
0%
UPR with Diffuser/Extension installed
3
3.95%
UPR without Diffuser/Extension installed
1
1.32%
Other Brand installed
4
5.26%
Currently no catch can installed, but considering one
31
40.79%
I don't need no stinking catch can
21
27.63%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll

Ecoboost Only Catch Can Poll

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2014, 02:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
phantomblackgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Parkville, MO
Posts: 556
Received 90 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Great post Papa. Thanks for the Rx install videos. I had not seen that before. I've read the written instructions, but always nice to see it live. Hoping to receive my dual valve in the mail today or tomorrow so I can install it this weekend. I totally agree with your comments, but just put this poll up to see what others were doing and hopefully to get some good feedback post install. Good feedback so far and keep the votes coming.
Old 07-14-2014, 05:27 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
fx4twenty6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 7
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.f150ecoboost.net/forum/14...-build-up.html

I hope this helps some guys. Follow the link.
This is a thread I started in another forum in reference to the coking of the intake valves and the results after removing the intake manifold and manually cleaning the valves.

Last edited by fx4twenty6; 07-15-2014 at 03:28 PM.
Old 07-15-2014, 08:57 AM
  #13  
FX4 SCrew TT'd V6
 
mrpositraction's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 1,999
Received 125 Likes on 91 Posts

Default

2013

Had some service work done, they asked a lot of questions, did some research them self. Ford had them take pictures of it. In the end, they replaced everything that needed replacing with no VOID in warranty. The dealer actually put it back on for me

That being said, since then, I have re-routed the RX Catch can in a way that I am not drilling into any plastic intakes. I am using a threaded port on the bottom of my S&B intake.

Can't say that I have seen any mileage increase but seeing the crap that comes out of it is reason enough to keep it. Have to empty it every 500 miles or so in the winter (and I have the Monster catch can). During the warmer months, I go thousands of miles without emptying it.

Oil level stays the same.
Old 07-15-2014, 11:53 AM
  #14  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

One driving thru south florida see almost 100% humidity thru the bogs especially very early mornings an will need to drain in summer often.
Old 07-15-2014, 11:51 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
dpig69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 23
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I installed my Rx dual valve catch can system back in March of this year, I thought it was time to post my report. My EB is a 2012 with no prior issues, never been in for warranty work yet. At the same time I also changed the plugs, removed the IC shield, and changed the oil. Right now I have just over 14000 miles on my truck, but I forgot to note the mileage when I installed the catch can. I opted for the vent-to-atmosphere for the clean side. I haven't removed the IC to clean it out, too much work for me.

I do mostly short city trips, not a lot a miles. During the spring I would catch a fair amount of liquid similar to what others had reported, but now during the summer months I have only been catching small amounts of oil. I have been getting better MPG's, could also be affected by the new spark plugs and IC shield removal. For the first few months there was no increase in oil level, but now the oil level has risen a bit.

Looking back on this project I'm happy with the results, would I do it all over again? Maybe, maybe not. It's a great project for people who are interested, but it costs money and work so I don't believe it's as necessary as others claim. Just my two cents, although it may be a bit early for final opinions, we'll wait and see how the system performs through the next cold winter.
Old 07-16-2014, 07:00 AM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
fx4twenty6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 7
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Take the time to look at the link that I shared. There are good pictures of my intake valves. My truck ran 39000 miles without a catch can. With the amount stuff I drain from my can and knowing what my intake looked like, I think that a can is definitely worth it.
Old 07-16-2014, 09:07 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,838
Received 373 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dpig69
I installed my Rx dual valve catch can system back in March of this year, I thought it was time to post my report. My EB is a 2012 with no prior issues, never been in for warranty work yet. At the same time I also changed the plugs, removed the IC shield, and changed the oil. Right now I have just over 14000 miles on my truck, but I forgot to note the mileage when I installed the catch can. I opted for the vent-to-atmosphere for the clean side. I haven't removed the IC to clean it out, too much work for me.

I do mostly short city trips, not a lot a miles. During the spring I would catch a fair amount of liquid similar to what others had reported, but now during the summer months I have only been catching small amounts of oil. I have been getting better MPG's, could also be affected by the new spark plugs and IC shield removal. For the first few months there was no increase in oil level, but now the oil level has risen a bit.

Looking back on this project I'm happy with the results, would I do it all over again? Maybe, maybe not. It's a great project for people who are interested, but it costs money and work so I don't believe it's as necessary as others claim. Just my two cents, although it may be a bit early for final opinions, we'll wait and see how the system performs through the next cold winter.
You'll be very glad when you see the crap you pull out, which varies a great deal through the year. By January, you'll have some times that will shock you with the amount that will drain from that can.
Old 07-17-2014, 03:05 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
phantomblackgto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Parkville, MO
Posts: 556
Received 90 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Well, we've hit the 50 vote mark. 38% have a can installed with the Rx dual valve leading by a fair margin. 32% obviously feel there are benefits from installing a can and are considering it. And, 30% don't feel there are any benefits from it and wouldn't waste their time or money on one. I still think there are multiple benefits from the cans, particularly with a GDI engine. My dual valve arrived in the mail yesterday and will be going on this weekend. Thanks to all who voted and participated in the discussion, and feel free to continue to provide honest feedback with your experiences. And, thanks to all for keeping the comments civilized.
Old 07-17-2014, 08:59 PM
  #19  
Member
 
papa tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 32,108
Received 239 Likes on 223 Posts

Default

All direct injection motors need it !
Old 07-17-2014, 09:19 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,928 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by papa tiger
All direct injection motors need it !
Some may need them. But many are getting by just fine without one.
The following users liked this post:
itguy08 (07-17-2014)


Quick Reply: Ecoboost Only Catch Can Poll



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.