Ecoboost condensate drain hole, post your results here
#871
Since this still seems to be going on in this thread.....
Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.
These are also facts that don't fit your story.
Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.
These are also facts that don't fit your story.
Or better yet, tell me how these people with the system are all making this up? All a conspiracy? I can't continue. Belive what you want.
#872
Senior Member
Unphuckingsubscribed..
The following users liked this post:
cartmanea (03-15-2014)
#873
Just Another Member
I don't understand why you can't just take this to the catch can thread. Your dissertation-length post is way, way off topic, and your big fat multi-page posts are winning you no friends here.
The following 3 users liked this post by Theocoog:
#874
Senior Member
Thread Starter
You did not answer ppp's question. The shudder happens mainly in warm climates. The catch cans fill up much quicker in the cold. Seems like two different problems here, but I'm pretty sure someone has pointed hat out already.
The following 3 users liked this post by engineermike:
#876
Senior Member
Did you even bother to click the link ( http://www.bgprod.com/bgfueltest/thi...s-to-the-test/) )
They took a 2010 Taurus SHO right off the showroom floor, which has, oh, I dono, the Ecoboost 3.5, a DI Engine. They then proceeded to drive it and document the effects of coking and other such DI ailments. They then proceeded to devise a "plan of attack" for the engines to keep them deposit free. Including a valve cleaning process.
So yea, it has everything to do with a DI engine because IT IS A DI ENGINE. IT IS THE CAR VERSION OF THE EB IN OUR TRUCKS!
Also, Ford has patents on many processes that in theory can help reduce intake coking as well as catchcan designs, yet to date have implemented none of them.
It has been widely said that Ford plays with valve timing, injector pulses, and a good PCV system in the Ecoboost to keep deposits at bay (especially compared to early DI engines).
So prove that none of this stuff is on our Ecoboosts. I posted the proof Ford knows about it and has systems to address it. Time for you to put up or shut up?
Since you're the only one saying the EB PCV system is defective, my challenge to you is still open. Contact the mods and lead us through it. From air entering the intake through the engine, back into the intake, and out the tailpipe. And explain why the system doesn't work under boost. Cause that's a pretty serious accusation for the 600k+ Ecoboost 3.5s out on the road today.
#877
To get back on topic, I drilled the hole roughly 5,000 miles ago and to this date no shuddering and the truck runs great. I have driven through rain, snow and ice and no problems whatsoever. Before the hole, it would shudder badly when cruising at a constant speed for a while and then WOT. I run LMS 93 SS tune which raises the shift points from 5800 to 6400 rpms and it would shudder like a MF trying to shift from 2nd to 3rd. Not anymore!!! Just gets up and goes. It's the best mod ever and it's free!
The following users liked this post:
Theocoog (03-15-2014)
#878
Since this still seems to be going on in this thread.....
Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.
These are also facts that don't fit your story.
Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.
These are also facts that don't fit your story.
If I was advertising I would NOT keep going over the technical cause and effect and list other brand cans you can do this with.
[/b]
Did you even bother to click the link ( http://www.bgprod.com/bgfueltest/thi...s-to-the-test/) )
They took a 2010 Taurus SHO right off the showroom floor, which has, oh, I dono, the Ecoboost 3.5, a DI Engine. They then proceeded to drive it and document the effects of coking and other such DI ailments. They then proceeded to devise a "plan of attack" for the engines to keep them deposit free. Including a valve cleaning process.
So yea, it has everything to do with a DI engine because IT IS A DI ENGINE. IT IS THE CAR VERSION OF THE EB IN OUR TRUCKS!
PROVE IT.
It has been widely said that Ford plays with valve timing, injector pulses, and a good PCV system in the Ecoboost to keep deposits at bay (especially compared to early DI engines).
So prove that none of this stuff is on our Ecoboosts. I posted the proof Ford knows about it and has systems to address it. Time for you to put up or shut up?
Since you're the only one saying the EB PCV system is defective, my challenge to you is still open. Contact the mods and lead us through it. From air entering the intake through the engine, back into the intake, and out the tailpipe. And explain why the system doesn't work under boost. Cause that's a pretty serious accusation for the 600k+ Ecoboost 3.5s out on the road today.
Did you even bother to click the link ( http://www.bgprod.com/bgfueltest/thi...s-to-the-test/) )
They took a 2010 Taurus SHO right off the showroom floor, which has, oh, I dono, the Ecoboost 3.5, a DI Engine. They then proceeded to drive it and document the effects of coking and other such DI ailments. They then proceeded to devise a "plan of attack" for the engines to keep them deposit free. Including a valve cleaning process.
So yea, it has everything to do with a DI engine because IT IS A DI ENGINE. IT IS THE CAR VERSION OF THE EB IN OUR TRUCKS!
PROVE IT.
It has been widely said that Ford plays with valve timing, injector pulses, and a good PCV system in the Ecoboost to keep deposits at bay (especially compared to early DI engines).
So prove that none of this stuff is on our Ecoboosts. I posted the proof Ford knows about it and has systems to address it. Time for you to put up or shut up?
Since you're the only one saying the EB PCV system is defective, my challenge to you is still open. Contact the mods and lead us through it. From air entering the intake through the engine, back into the intake, and out the tailpipe. And explain why the system doesn't work under boost. Cause that's a pretty serious accusation for the 600k+ Ecoboost 3.5s out on the road today.
Shows how little you know about DI engines. The BG upper induction cleaning can loosen and clean some of thee deposits as any upper induction solution, but ONLY a manual valve cleaning can restore the valves to as new function. Just as you list your old lexus non DI as an example.....go work on netwroks and leave the automotive tech to those qualified, and thats not you or the others arguing here.
It is impossible for the intake valve timing to have any effect on intake valve coking. To do so would require a valve to be open at the time of fuel introduction, and that does not happen until the final 20-30% of the compression stroke, so tell me how that would be accomplished?
But I am bowing out of this thread....let your ignorance guide you and good luck with your engines.
#879
Senior Member
Shows how little you know about DI engines. The BG upper induction cleaning can loosen and clean some of thee deposits as any upper induction solution, but ONLY a manual valve cleaning can restore the valves to as new function. Just as you list your old lexus non DI as an example.....go work on netwroks and leave the automotive tech to those qualified, and thats not you or the others arguing here.
http://www.bgprod.com/catalog/gasoli...ction-cleaner/
And I'm not a fan of BG products at all.
But then again it's not a catch can so it can't possibly work or be applicable.
If you are representative of "those qualified", I'll continue turning wrenches on my own cars and trucks, thanks. Thankfully I do my own work where possible and have a good relationship with my dealer.
It is impossible for the intake valve timing to have any effect on intake valve coking. To do so would require a valve to be open at the time of fuel introduction, and that does not happen until the final 20-30% of the compression stroke, so tell me how that would be accomplished?
See here:
http://www.edmunds.com/autoobserver-...-adopters.html
Scroll down to this "All Engines Not Designed Equally" and read carefully for both Ford ad GM.
But I am bowing out of this thread....let your ignorance guide you and good luck with your engines.
#880
Senior Member
Um.......72k isn't ****! Report back when you have 200k!
Sorry, but your posts remind me of that State Farm Insurance commercial, it is on the internet, so it must be true? As she walks off with her date, the French model, AKA: momobrow man!
Sorry, but your posts remind me of that State Farm Insurance commercial, it is on the internet, so it must be true? As she walks off with her date, the French model, AKA: momobrow man!