Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost condensate drain hole, post your results here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2014, 09:31 PM
  #871  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
Since this still seems to be going on in this thread.....

Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.

These are also facts that don't fit your story.
Tell me what part you dont understand in the detailed explanation I just made...it's all in there if you read it.

Or better yet, tell me how these people with the system are all making this up? All a conspiracy? I can't continue. Belive what you want.
Old 03-14-2014, 09:35 PM
  #872  
Senior Member
 
BucketMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,219
Received 387 Likes on 274 Posts

Default

Unphuckingsubscribed..
The following users liked this post:
cartmanea (03-15-2014)
Old 03-14-2014, 09:52 PM
  #873  
Just Another Member

 
Theocoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England
Posts: 7,109
Received 187 Likes on 127 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost

Tell me what part you dont understand in the detailed explanation I just made...it's all in there if you read it.

Or better yet, tell me how these people with the system are all making this up? All a conspiracy? I can't continue. Belive what you want.
I don't understand why you can't just take this to the catch can thread. Your dissertation-length post is way, way off topic, and your big fat multi-page posts are winning you no friends here.
The following 3 users liked this post by Theocoog:
engineermike (03-14-2014), itguy08 (03-15-2014), LastResort (03-15-2014)
Old 03-14-2014, 10:23 PM
  #874  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
Tell me what part you dont understand in the detailed explanation I just made...it's all in there if you read it.
You did not answer ppp's question. The shudder happens mainly in warm climates. The catch cans fill up much quicker in the cold. Seems like two different problems here, but I'm pretty sure someone has pointed hat out already.
Old 03-14-2014, 10:31 PM
  #875  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
. ..air is compressed and heated to steam...

... That is my argument and is stone cold fact.
Mmmk.


Please stop advertising in my thread.
The following 3 users liked this post by engineermike:
Fissues (03-15-2014), itguy08 (03-15-2014), MadocHandyman (03-15-2014)
Old 03-15-2014, 08:58 AM
  #876  
Senior Member
 
itguy08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 835
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
That test has nothing to do with a DI engine as no fuel, no additives, nothing from the fuel ever touches the intake valves so how could it?


Did you even bother to click the link ( http://www.bgprod.com/bgfueltest/thi...s-to-the-test/) )

They took a 2010 Taurus SHO right off the showroom floor, which has, oh, I dono, the Ecoboost 3.5, a DI Engine. They then proceeded to drive it and document the effects of coking and other such DI ailments. They then proceeded to devise a "plan of attack" for the engines to keep them deposit free. Including a valve cleaning process.

So yea, it has everything to do with a DI engine because IT IS A DI ENGINE. IT IS THE CAR VERSION OF THE EB IN OUR TRUCKS!


Also, Ford has patents on many processes that in theory can help reduce intake coking as well as catchcan designs, yet to date have implemented none of them.
PROVE IT.

It has been widely said that Ford plays with valve timing, injector pulses, and a good PCV system in the Ecoboost to keep deposits at bay (especially compared to early DI engines).

So prove that none of this stuff is on our Ecoboosts. I posted the proof Ford knows about it and has systems to address it. Time for you to put up or shut up?

Since you're the only one saying the EB PCV system is defective, my challenge to you is still open. Contact the mods and lead us through it. From air entering the intake through the engine, back into the intake, and out the tailpipe. And explain why the system doesn't work under boost. Cause that's a pretty serious accusation for the 600k+ Ecoboost 3.5s out on the road today.
Old 03-15-2014, 09:38 AM
  #877  
Member
 
Mitch03's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

To get back on topic, I drilled the hole roughly 5,000 miles ago and to this date no shuddering and the truck runs great. I have driven through rain, snow and ice and no problems whatsoever. Before the hole, it would shudder badly when cruising at a constant speed for a while and then WOT. I run LMS 93 SS tune which raises the shift points from 5800 to 6400 rpms and it would shudder like a MF trying to shift from 2nd to 3rd. Not anymore!!! Just gets up and goes. It's the best mod ever and it's free!
The following users liked this post:
Theocoog (03-15-2014)
Old 03-15-2014, 09:41 AM
  #878  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by packplantpath
Since this still seems to be going on in this thread.....

Tuner,please explain why a catch can that fills faster in the winter would be expected to fix a problem that occurs almost exclusively in warm weather. If the catch can is catching more in winter,presumably vehicles without it would also be filling the intercooler faster in winter. Yet reports of limp mode condensation in winter are all but nonexistent compared to summer.

These are also facts that don't fit your story.
The catchcan, as I have said has little to do with the shudder, it is caused by the water acccumulation in the CAC, and it is present in all weather. My point in all of this is if you correct the PCV system so it evacuates like a PCV system should, then it stops....something you keep ignoring. The catchcan only collects the gunk AFTER it has entered the crankcase.

Originally Posted by engineermike
You did not answer ppp's question. The shudder happens mainly in warm climates. The catch cans fill up much quicker in the cold. Seems like two different problems here, but I'm pretty sure someone has pointed hat out already.
Again, if you actually read my explanations you would not post such a question....so do what you choose to your truck. It is yours, don't do a thing to prolong engine life...it's perfect already as it comes and there is nothing to fix according to you and it...and YOU invited me here, remember?

Originally Posted by engineermike
Mmmk.


Please stop advertising in my thread.
If I was advertising I would NOT keep going over the technical cause and effect and list other brand cans you can do this with.

Originally Posted by itguy08
[/b]

Did you even bother to click the link ( http://www.bgprod.com/bgfueltest/thi...s-to-the-test/) )

They took a 2010 Taurus SHO right off the showroom floor, which has, oh, I dono, the Ecoboost 3.5, a DI Engine. They then proceeded to drive it and document the effects of coking and other such DI ailments. They then proceeded to devise a "plan of attack" for the engines to keep them deposit free. Including a valve cleaning process.

So yea, it has everything to do with a DI engine because IT IS A DI ENGINE. IT IS THE CAR VERSION OF THE EB IN OUR TRUCKS!




PROVE IT.

It has been widely said that Ford plays with valve timing, injector pulses, and a good PCV system in the Ecoboost to keep deposits at bay (especially compared to early DI engines).

So prove that none of this stuff is on our Ecoboosts. I posted the proof Ford knows about it and has systems to address it. Time for you to put up or shut up?

Since you're the only one saying the EB PCV system is defective, my challenge to you is still open. Contact the mods and lead us through it. From air entering the intake through the engine, back into the intake, and out the tailpipe. And explain why the system doesn't work under boost. Cause that's a pretty serious accusation for the 600k+ Ecoboost 3.5s out on the road today.

Shows how little you know about DI engines. The BG upper induction cleaning can loosen and clean some of thee deposits as any upper induction solution, but ONLY a manual valve cleaning can restore the valves to as new function. Just as you list your old lexus non DI as an example.....go work on netwroks and leave the automotive tech to those qualified, and thats not you or the others arguing here.

It is impossible for the intake valve timing to have any effect on intake valve coking. To do so would require a valve to be open at the time of fuel introduction, and that does not happen until the final 20-30% of the compression stroke, so tell me how that would be accomplished?

But I am bowing out of this thread....let your ignorance guide you and good luck with your engines.
Old 03-15-2014, 10:03 AM
  #879  
Senior Member
 
itguy08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 835
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
Shows how little you know about DI engines. The BG upper induction cleaning can loosen and clean some of thee deposits as any upper induction solution, but ONLY a manual valve cleaning can restore the valves to as new function. Just as you list your old lexus non DI as an example.....go work on netwroks and leave the automotive tech to those qualified, and thats not you or the others arguing here.
PS: It's not the BG Upper induction, it's this that they used:
http://www.bgprod.com/catalog/gasoli...ction-cleaner/

And I'm not a fan of BG products at all.

But then again it's not a catch can so it can't possibly work or be applicable.


If you are representative of "those qualified", I'll continue turning wrenches on my own cars and trucks, thanks. Thankfully I do my own work where possible and have a good relationship with my dealer.

It is impossible for the intake valve timing to have any effect on intake valve coking. To do so would require a valve to be open at the time of fuel introduction, and that does not happen until the final 20-30% of the compression stroke, so tell me how that would be accomplished?
Valve overlap, similar to how they use timing of the valves to eliminate EGR valves in newer engines. Also Injector timing/pulsing is used

See here:
http://www.edmunds.com/autoobserver-...-adopters.html
Scroll down to this "All Engines Not Designed Equally" and read carefully for both Ford ad GM.

But I am bowing out of this thread....let your ignorance guide you and good luck with your engines.
My ignorance has 72k trouble free miles on 1 Ecoboost and 45k on another. That same "ignorance" has probably close to a million miles spread over various engines with never an issue. I'll stick with proper maintenance rather than relying on a salesman. But thanks for the concern.
Old 03-15-2014, 10:18 AM
  #880  
Senior Member
 
Left Plate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West of the East
Posts: 9,772
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Um.......72k isn't ****! Report back when you have 200k!

Sorry, but your posts remind me of that State Farm Insurance commercial, it is on the internet, so it must be true? As she walks off with her date, the French model, AKA: momobrow man!


Quick Reply: Ecoboost condensate drain hole, post your results here



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.