Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Ecoboost condensate catch can, post your results here

Old 03-12-2014, 11:20 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
itguy08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 835
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Left Plate
Obviously you have learned nothing yet about DI engines!

The picture of the intake valves are mine at 68k. There is no wash as the fuel charge is injected into the combustion chamber below these valves. The only wash that they will get is by the accumulation of snot shown in the first picture!
Accumulate enough of this and you begin to throw off your air/fuel ratio, which which ultimately leads to loss of fuel efficiency and power, which normally would be the best case scenario. The worst case senecio would be severe valve deposits that ultimately lead to valve train failure!
I know quite a bit about DI engines. I've seen all the pictures and did a fair amount of research. Heard of the VW/Audi issues as well as the early GM issues.

If you look at my signature, I own 2 vehicles with them. One with 72k and one with 45k.

The only ones claiming these non severe deposits cause issues are those selling products to "fix them". BG products set out to quantify it (www.bgfueltest.com) and while there was a power loss, the valve deposits had a negligible impact.

I can show you 72k worth of fuel economy data (yes I track every fillip) of my SHO. Summer: 25 MPG on long highway trips, 20-22 mixed. Winter: 22 or so on highway, 19-20 mixed. Like Clockwork for the past 4.25 years.

To get back to the thread, we'll have to agree to disagree. If we want to debate, shoot me a PM or start a new thread.
Old 03-12-2014, 01:15 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

And the world is flat as well.......you have made your point yet seem to have a mission to make the rest of the world go away. Behead the messenger for bringing bad news and a way to correct it. If you have no issues with your vehicles, great. You dont need any of this. But the rest of the world showing these issues do so leave them alone please.
The following 4 users liked this post by Tuner Boost:
Bills96TA (03-18-2014), brucesears (03-12-2014), Buellracer (03-12-2014), Left Plate (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 02:01 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
natural gasser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tn.
Posts: 232
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

"If you look at my signature, I own 2 vehicles with them. One with 72k and one with 45k."

Have you pulled the heads on either and looked at combustion chambers, and top of the pistons?
Anyone that owns a performance enhanced Harley Davidson can tell you the benefits of breathing to a catch can. The oil/water mix that goes through the throttle body does not get burned completely and gums up the idle air control, carbons the valves and pistons to the point of hot spots in the combustion chamber resulting in engine ping/excessive heat.
Maybe and I say maybe, a water cooled engine won't to the same degree as the Harley engine, but over time there will be build up, and that is detrimental. Don't believe what I say, ask any racer, and they teardown on a regular basis.
The following users liked this post:
brucesears (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 02:02 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
General Pain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 173
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
And the world is flat as well.......you have made your point yet seem to have a mission to make the rest of the world go away. Behead the messenger for bringing bad news and a way to correct it. If you have no issues with your vehicles, great. You dont need any of this. But the rest of the world showing these issues do so leave them alone please.

Let me guess....and you have a solution that will fix this?!....well, isn't that convenient….lol.
The following users liked this post:
snobdds (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 02:10 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
itguy08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 835
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natural gasser
"If you look at my signature, I own 2 vehicles with them. One with 72k and one with 45k."

Have you pulled the heads on either and looked at combustion chambers, and top of the pistons?
Anyone that owns a performance enhanced Harley Davidson can tell you the benefits of breathing to a catch can. The oil/water mix that goes through the throttle body does not get burned completely and gums up the idle air control, carbons the valves and pistons to the point of hot spots in the combustion chamber resulting in engine ping/excessive heat.
Maybe and I say maybe, a water cooled engine won't to the same degree as the Harley engine, but over time there will be build up, and that is detrimental. Don't believe what I say, ask any racer, and they teardown on a regular basis.
I see what you are saying and no I have not. One of these days I'm going to get a boroscope.

I will say the plugs on the SHO looked nice and tan when I had them out a couple weeks ago for replacement. I've not noticed any drivability concerns and a check via OBD2 and the Torque app shows that timing isn't being abnormal pulled. Still looking for a PID for knock. I know there is one there - that's how they figured my knock sensor was bad.

The F150, I pulled the plugs (4k RPM miss) and they were a little black. But I think that's because I started the truck up, pulled into the garage and shut it down.
Old 03-12-2014, 02:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
brucesears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Western Oklahoma
Posts: 834
Received 130 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itguy08
That (residue on oil cap) is not unique to the Ecoboost. It's been present on the Modulars (and other engines for years).

This will be my only post to this thread.

Then quit, you obviously think you know everything and obviously you don't.
The following users liked this post:
Left Plate (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 02:18 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
cartmanea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 156
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
you have made your point yet seem to have a mission to make the rest of the world go away.
Both sides have made their points over and over. Both people holding on to something have to let it go to drop it...
Old 03-12-2014, 02:22 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
natural gasser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tn.
Posts: 232
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

I think the spark plugs can be decieving, the ones in my motorcycle looked good, on tear down I couldn't believe the amount of carbon everywhere. At one point a few years ago, when folks smarter than me suggested I vent to a can, I said it wasn't necessary. The more I get involved on the inside of engines, I should have taken heir advice then, I most certainly do now.
Old 03-12-2014, 02:33 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Left Plate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: West of the East
Posts: 9,772
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itguy08
I know quite a bit about DI engines. I've seen all the pictures and did a fair amount of research. Heard of the VW/Audi issues as well as the early GM issues.

If you look at my signature, I own 2 vehicles with them. One with 72k and one with 45k.

The only ones claiming these non severe deposits cause issues are those selling products to "fix them". BG products set out to quantify it (www.bgfueltest.com) and while there was a power loss, the valve deposits had a negligible impact.

I can show you 72k worth of fuel economy data (yes I track every fillip) of my SHO. Summer: 25 MPG on long highway trips, 20-22 mixed. Winter: 22 or so on highway, 19-20 mixed. Like Clockwork for the past 4.25 years.

To get back to the thread, we'll have to agree to disagree. If we want to debate, shoot me a PM or start a new thread.
You are really not going to see many issues at less than 100k. I do think issues will start showing up at 125k to 150k, but it will take some time for those vehicles to hit that mileage! By then the damage is done!

The only debate that I see here is wether you know as much as you THINK you do? But based on your posts, it would seem as if you don't know what you think you do!
The following users liked this post:
brucesears (03-12-2014)
Old 03-12-2014, 02:35 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
itguy08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 835
Received 177 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Left Plate
You are really not going to see many issues at less than 100k. I do think issues will start showing up at 125k to 150k, but it will take some time for those vehicles to hit that mileage! By then the damage is done!

The only debate that I see here is wether you know as much as you THINK you do? But based on your posts, it would seem as if you don't know what you think you do!
Well, we'll see as I plan to keep both till the wheels fall off. Almost 1/2 way to 150k!

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Ecoboost condensate catch can, post your results here



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.