Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Data logging other tuners tunes, tweaking, then calling them your own?

Old 07-20-2013, 05:18 PM
  #21  
Member
 
Boosted Limited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,030
Received 200 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by socaldiablo
Why are the Livernois folks in such Denial? They suck is why. They got fat stupid and lazy. You are right on that boys!! Lets here from the qtr miler..err.. tuners..I mean guys who do nothing but post and run their mouth. You arm chair tuners where are you? Just like you arm chair QBs on Monday morning.
And it **** like this that is not cool. What company would come on a forum and make a statement like this. My god! This guy has no class!! And is bootlegging LMS tunes. Wow what a guy.

Last edited by Boosted Limited; 07-20-2013 at 05:29 PM.
Old 07-20-2013, 11:56 PM
  #22  
better looking than geno
 
CoreyMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 1,373
Received 275 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

First off. I did not and will not "bootleg" anyone's ****. Even if it were possible. I asked cbvet this before I even had talked to socal, why you ask because I wasn't happy with where I was at.


To be frank, you could get very little from the files he even made, the first one was advance and boost, with no rpm or anything. Then I told him put the knock and afr, he sent that without the boost and spark. I might have spent 5 minutes glancing at it and really didn't want to waste anymore time when I really didn't want to spend 600 dollars to go 99 MPH again, like 99% of the guys with the same configuration of truck I have on lms tunes, like Joe.

I have owned damn near every tune known to man for this truck other than LMS. That's a fact.

This crap is the exact reason people, people that led the way in racing these trucks, don't visit this site anymore. Probably time I join them.
Old 07-21-2013, 12:17 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
StrawHatShinobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 728
Received 99 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

^^^ I've been waiting for you to chime in on this Corey, too bad this has turned into what it has. I might not agree with him getting on the forum and making some of the comments, but its really no worse than coming up with he ripped of Liv by looking at a log. If its not one thing regarding SoCal its another...
Old 07-21-2013, 12:33 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Snowflake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 995
Received 130 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CoreyMS
First off. I did not and will not "bootleg" anyone's ****. Even if it were possible. I asked cbvet this before I even had talked to socal, why you ask because I wasn't happy with where I was at.

To be frank, you could get very little from the files he even made, the first one was advance and boost, with no rpm or anything. Then I told him put the knock and afr, he sent that without the boost and spark. I might have spent 5 minutes glancing at it and really didn't want to waste anymore time when I really didn't want to spend 600 dollars to go 99 MPH again, like 99% of the guys with the same configuration of truck I have on lms tunes, like Joe.

I have owned damn near every tune known to man for this truck other than LMS. That's a fact.

This crap is the exact reason people, people that led the way in racing these trucks, don't visit this site anymore. Probably time I join them.
I left this forum after I got tired of the negativity about the ecoboost was looking for everyone else's problems. Came back when I was looking for a tune and believe it or not the only ones were 5* and liv. After 4 tuners I wish liv would have called me but I did find one I'm happy with. I have your SoCal one from two weeks ago and that's not my fav lol


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Data logging other tuners tunes, tweaking, then calling them your own?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:09 AM.