Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

Custom tune from "SoCal Tuning" review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2013, 09:03 PM
  #101  
better looking than geno
 
CoreyMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 1,373
Received 275 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

If I had time to go to the track I would have already bought it for "testing"...to bad
Old 05-11-2013, 09:16 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CoreyMS
If I had time to go to the track I would have already bought it for "testing"...to bad
You have almost every Eco tune known to man, don't you Corey? lol
Old 05-11-2013, 10:47 PM
  #103  
Junior Member
 
Zmoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pharr, TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lanmorga
Just did another run now that it has cooled off a bit (still 70 outside).

In 4WD HI:
She ran 14.33 at 95MPH
0-60 was 5.6 seconds

I think this is actually pretty good with the heaviest possible f150 rolling on stock 20's with 34" tires wrapped around em. I'd like to see another truck running 34" LT tires beat that time...

Not even running methanol yet (its installed though )
I ran 14.17 @ 94.7 mph with my Livernois tune with wrangler duratracs 275-65R20. The taller tire got my truck from 13.81 to 14.1. I am very interested in the methanol injection but not willing to pay $1200 for livernois kit. Please keep us posted on your meth endeavors...
The following users liked this post:
lanmorga (05-11-2013)
Old 05-11-2013, 11:13 PM
  #104  
Senior Member
 
jcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,595
Received 461 Likes on 310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lanmorga
Just did another run now that it has cooled off a bit (still 70 outside).

In 4WD HI:
She ran 14.33 at 95MPH
0-60 was 5.6 seconds

I think this is actually pretty good with the heaviest possible f150 rolling on stock 20's with 34" tires wrapped around em. I'd like to see another truck running 34" LT tires beat that time...
How official...
Old 05-11-2013, 11:33 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcain
How official...
Hatterrrssss

Want the "performance" file from my SCT? Has all the specs. Better yet, I'll take a picture of the screen next time (can proabably do a run tonight)

Originally Posted by Zmoy
I ran 14.17 @ 94.7 mph with my Livernois tune with wrangler duratracs 275-65R20. The taller tire got my truck from 13.81 to 14.1. I am very interested in the methanol injection but not willing to pay $1200 for livernois kit. Please keep us posted on your meth endeavors...
Zmoy, thanks! Extremely helpful. This gives me an idea of what my truck could run with my pirellis back on. Now that we have apples to apples, it looks like the two tunes were close with Livernois coming out ahead - barely.

A few things, I am running 91 Octane... is yours the 93v2 tune? Did you take off the tailgate, air down tires, etc... in prep for the 1/4 mile?

OH! Also... I paid $700 for the same kit Livernois sells. Get it directly from Alkycontrol.com. Livernois buys the kit, makes a single bracket for the resevoir and marks it up $500. This is Livernois' business model in general - slaps their name on a product that someone else makes and charges an absurd amount.

Last edited by lanmorga; 05-11-2013 at 11:55 PM.
Old 05-12-2013, 12:26 AM
  #106  
Junior Member
 
Zmoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pharr, TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lanmorga
Hatterrrssss

Want the "performance" file from my SCT? Has all the specs. Better yet, I'll take a picture of the screen next time (can proabably do a run tonight)



Zmoy, thanks! Extremely helpful. This gives me an idea of what my truck could run with my pirellis back on. Now that we have apples to apples, it looks like the two tunes were close with Livernois coming out ahead - barely.

A few things, I am running 91 Octane... is yours the 93v2 tune? Did you take off the tailgate, air down tires, etc... in prep for the 1/4 mile?

OH! Also... I paid $700 for the same kit Livernois sells. Get it directly from Alkycontrol.com. Livernois buys the kit, makes a single bracket for the resevoir and marks it up $500. This is Livernois' business model in general - slaps their name on a product that someone else makes and charges an absurd amount.
I did not want to mess around with the wires for the rear camera, so I left the tailgate on. I do have the 93v2 and I don't think airing down the tires is helpful when launching in 4hi. The spare tire has been removed. I think it weight in around 80lbs.

I am aware of alky control, but I didn't want to spend that much money either. So, I went with one of the 50/50 mixture guys out there. I actually lost 1/10 on the quarter and one mph as well. Livernois does not want to offer tuning help since I did not buy thier kit. Livernois claims like 27 rwhp with same tune and their meth kit. I believe I can replicate that if I only get the right help on the nozzle flow rate.
Old 05-12-2013, 02:45 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

That is exactly my problem too. It has to be dialed in perfectly and will actually make you slower if your not spraying the right amount. This is why I am not using my meth injection right now until Shawn is back in town and can help me. When we get things dialed in, hopefully I can help you out.

On to the tunes... mine ran 14.33 last night on 91 octane and you have run 14.17 on Livernois 93v2. That is pretty close peeps . Not to mention I am running on California gas which according to Shawn is much lower quality and he can tune MUCH more aggressively with the better gas offered in most other states.

I have no reason to lie to you people, I do not work for SoCal - I just want to spread the word when I get my hands on a great product. I did the same with Unleashed and everyone that purchased said their expectations were met or exceeded. But, for those of you that insist on proof, I ran tonight at 14.49 with 80 degree air temps (it got 100+ today). My 0-60 was 5.59. Pics below...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/skmrkg0jh2...511_232535.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mdz9v1n37e...511_212459.jpg

The picture says 87 but I hadn't started driving yet - air temp made its way down to 80 after I started driving. Hopefully yall believe my 14.33 now.

Last edited by lanmorga; 05-12-2013 at 02:48 AM.
Old 05-12-2013, 12:48 PM
  #108  
Junior Member
 
Zmoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pharr, TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lanmorga
That is exactly my problem too. It has to be dialed in perfectly and will actually make you slower if your not spraying the right amount. This is why I am not using my meth injection right now until Shawn is back in town and can help me. When we get things dialed in, hopefully I can help you out.

On to the tunes... mine ran 14.33 last night on 91 octane and you have run 14.17 on Livernois 93v2. That is pretty close peeps . Not to mention I am running on California gas which according to Shawn is much lower quality and he can tune MUCH more aggressively with the better gas offered in most other states.

I have no reason to lie to you people, I do not work for SoCal - I just want to spread the word when I get my hands on a great product. I did the same with Unleashed and everyone that purchased said their expectations were met or exceeded. But, for those of you that insist on proof, I ran tonight at 14.49 with 80 degree air temps (it got 100+ today). My 0-60 was 5.59. Pics below...

https://www.dropbox.com/s/skmrkg0jh2...511_232535.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mdz9v1n37e...511_212459.jpg

The picture says 87 but I hadn't started driving yet - air temp made its way down to 80 after I started driving. Hopefully yall believe my 14.33 now.
You could very well be running better times with a 93 octane tune. I'm looking forward for some quarter mile times once you get some better gas out there.

As far as the meht goes, I would greatly appreciate any help you can provide.

Last edited by Zmoy; 05-12-2013 at 12:52 PM. Reason: Misspell
Old 05-12-2013, 02:33 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
 
Rob1334's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 927
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

So all these "facts" and basing 1/4 mile times using torque app?? I think it's OK if you are just using it as a comparison between your newly bought tunes, but it is a LONG ways from accurate enough to compare it to official times people have ran at the track. I love seeing new tuners getting into the ecoboost game because it means more gains for the consumer, but let's not put the cart before the horse.
Old 05-12-2013, 03:03 PM
  #110  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
lanmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 821
Received 79 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob1334
So all these "facts" and basing 1/4 mile times using torque app?? I think it's OK if you are just using it as a comparison between your newly bought tunes, but it is a LONG ways from accurate enough to compare it to official times people have ran at the track. I love seeing new tuners getting into the ecoboost game because it means more gains for the consumer, but let's not put the cart before the horse.
Nah dude, that is NOT torque app. It is the SCT Liverwire that uses your computer's tire revolutions, vehicle speed, elapsed time, etc to caluculate 1/4 mile. As long as your speedometer is correct then it is absolutely 100% correct.

Toque App uses GPS and is not accurate because of it. I've never used the app, does it even use vehicle data at all? Anyways, the SCT is accurate...

Last edited by lanmorga; 05-12-2013 at 03:06 PM.


Quick Reply: Custom tune from "SoCal Tuning" review



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.