Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

COST TO REPAIR TWIN TURBO's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2011, 11:15 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
JATT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: US/CAN
Posts: 163
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

How expensive are the injectors?????
Any idea how long do they last?
Old 12-05-2011, 11:36 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
FX4 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New London, Wisconsin
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I could do it all over again, my 5.0 would be a 3.5 maybe next year or just another one? even tho I am mostly in the 1 ton market my personal truck doesnt have to be, as far as turbo's I just sold a 95 powerstroke 2nd year with the turbo'd 7.3 DI, and it had 394k on the turbo no issues...so turbo's shouldnt be a factor injectors are costly but the power and fuel economy difference would be worth it
Old 12-05-2011, 03:33 PM
  #23  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Upgrade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Upgrade
Does anyone know what the out of pocket cost would be to repair or replace the twin turbos on the ecoboost?

I'm not sure if the 3.5 or the 5.0 is the right truck for me and the cost of that repair or replacement, once the warranty runs out, may be the deciding factor. I had someone tell me that turbos don't last long and are costly to replace (they probably don't know what they're talking about, but then again neither do I).
Decided to go with the EB. Thanks for putting my mind at ease about the turbos.
Old 12-05-2011, 03:54 PM
  #24  
Administrator


 
Lenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 15,044
Received 1,682 Likes on 587 Posts

Default

I know you made up your mind... but I feel its pertinant to let you know that I owned a 1985 Volvo 760 Turbo sedan a few years ago. It had 333k miles on it when I purchased it. By the time I sold it a year later, it had just under 400k miles and it was on its ORIGINAL turbo, engine, transmission and rear end. Apparently, the kid that purchased it is still driving it around the streets of Richmond, VA.

Keep the oil changed and the PCV valve clean and you won't (or shouldn't) ever have to replace them.
Old 12-05-2011, 08:11 PM
  #25  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Upgrade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Lenn
I know you made up your mind... but I feel its pertinant to let you know that I owned a 1985 Volvo 760 Turbo sedan a few years ago. It had 333k miles on it when I purchased it. By the time I sold it a year later, it had just under 400k miles and it was on its ORIGINAL turbo, engine, transmission and rear end. Apparently, the kid that purchased it is still driving it around the streets of Richmond, VA.

Keep the oil changed and the PCV valve clean and you won't (or shouldn't) ever have to replace them.
Cool. Thanks, Lenn.
Old 09-04-2013, 01:47 AM
  #26  
Diagnostic Electrician
 
hookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NM
Posts: 96
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Twisty
A turbo is an exceptionally simple device and it is very unlikely to fail. Ever.
Yeah.... About that.... Two weeks ago I grenaded my drivers side turbo...took out my Cat too.

30,000 miles so hopefully it's all warranty work

Last edited by hookie; 09-04-2013 at 01:50 AM. Reason: Left out mileage
The following users liked this post:
cdnoldman (09-05-2013)
Old 09-04-2013, 03:08 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
marinemike0931's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Luling, LA
Posts: 784
Received 107 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hookie

Yeah.... About that.... Two weeks ago I grenaded my drivers side turbo...took out my Cat too.

30,000 miles so hopefully it's all warranty work
Man you're resurrecting some OLD stuff, lol... with the tune, it probably won't be warranty work, just a warning. Let me know though, trying to decide if I'm willing to keep this thing or not... I'm spoiled by the power in the tune and not willing to go back to stock but don't want to worry about what it'll cost me when I suck up a slug of water and hydro-lock my motor.
Old 09-04-2013, 06:24 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Gonzales, La
Posts: 5,462
Received 1,556 Likes on 990 Posts

Default

If 10 turbos fail out of 800,000, they have a failure rate of .0013%.
The following users liked this post:
Snowflake (09-04-2013)
Old 09-04-2013, 08:45 AM
  #29  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by burt.trans
I drove both and thought they both were great engines. I wanted the Eco but what sold me was price. Dealers were dealing more on the 5.0 and it cost $750 less plus they were knocking about $2000 more off the 5.0 MSRP. I went with the 5.0 because I got it for almost $3000 less. I am getting 17 mpg average and love the truck!
Congrats! You will love the 5.0! You'll also love the extra cash in your wallet for mods!

With that money you can level, get new tires, and upgrade the audio on your truck, and still have a little coin left over! Was a big factor for me when I bought too. Got a similar deal. Enjoy your new toy!
Old 09-04-2013, 08:48 AM
  #30  
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
 
sullyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 2,616
Received 394 Likes on 259 Posts

Default

Bwahahahahaha! I just realized how old this thread was! Need more coffee, stat!


Quick Reply: COST TO REPAIR TWIN TURBO's



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.