Boating Magazine towing test: Ecoboost vs 6.2
#11
F150 Forum
I'd like to see what a tune would have done for both, that's where the BIG differences would show. The Raptor would pick up maybe 30TQ and the Ecoboost around 100TQ and possibly 1 or 2 MPG.
#12
Senior Member
Add 100tq AND add the 600lbs - as long as we are comparing apples and gummy bears.
lol
#14
Senior Member
Apples to gummy bears.
#15
Senior Member
Under normal towing speeds with the same amount of weight I average 10-10.6mpg.. Just wish they picked an F150 with the same options and gearing as the Eco for the test, The results are still impressive none the less!
#16
the 4.10 gears make up for the 35" tires. (31.9"x 4.10)/(34.7")= 3.77. So the Raptor with 35's & 4.10's is like having 3.77:1 gears in the ecoboost right? The tire mass is an issue but shouldn't affect the type of test towing as *much* as it would on a 1/4mi time or dyno run to redline right? Off the line, the suspension movement might hinder the Raptor in "soaking up" power being put to the ground. I agree though, a 6.2 SCREW vs 3.5 SCREW would have made more sense.
#18
Senior Member
the 4.10 gears make up for the 35" tires. (31.9"x 4.10)/(34.7")= 3.77. So the Raptor with 35's & 4.10's is like having 3.77:1 gears in the ecoboost right? The tire mass is an issue but shouldn't affect the type of test towing as *much* as it would on a 1/4mi time or dyno run to redline right? Off the line, the suspension movement might hinder the Raptor in "soaking up" power being put to the ground. I agree though, a 6.2 SCREW vs 3.5 SCREW would have made more sense.
#19
I guess I always have fat chicks with me....humph.
#20
Senior Member