Anyone had the 5.0 #8 Cyl Issue?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Anyone had the 5.0 #8 Cyl Issue?
I keep seeing the reliability discussion between the 5.0 owners and the EB owners. I don't want to detract from either engine as they are both amazing but I do want to sort out the facts. Is the coyote cylinder #8 issue actually affecting F150's?
I have been through tons of mustang forums and there did seem to be an issue with a small number of engines from build 1&2 in the 2011 mustangs especially if tuned. However, there were not many cases and all that I could find had tunes in them boosting the engine to over the stock 412hp. I have seen several explanations, some totally bogus and since debunked but 2 plausible ones including a batch of bad cylinder sleeves. I have not heard of any F150's being affected at all. Our engine is a different tune, heads, intake, compression ratio and has an oil cooler.
So, has anyone had to have their 5.0 replaced and how many. Are we talking one or two or tens and hundreds? Let's find facts instead of internet stories.
Thanks.
I have been through tons of mustang forums and there did seem to be an issue with a small number of engines from build 1&2 in the 2011 mustangs especially if tuned. However, there were not many cases and all that I could find had tunes in them boosting the engine to over the stock 412hp. I have seen several explanations, some totally bogus and since debunked but 2 plausible ones including a batch of bad cylinder sleeves. I have not heard of any F150's being affected at all. Our engine is a different tune, heads, intake, compression ratio and has an oil cooler.
So, has anyone had to have their 5.0 replaced and how many. Are we talking one or two or tens and hundreds? Let's find facts instead of internet stories.
Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
I keep seeing the reliability discussion between the 5.0 owners and the EB owners. I don't want to detract from either engine as they are both amazing but I do want to sort out the facts. Is the coyote cylinder #8 issue actually affecting F150's?
I have been through tons of mustang forums and there did seem to be an issue with a small number of engines from build 1&2 in the 2011 mustangs especially if tuned. However, there were not many cases and all that I could find had tunes in them boosting the engine to over the stock 412hp. I have seen several explanations, some totally bogus and since debunked but 2 plausible ones including a batch of bad cylinder sleeves. I have not heard of any F150's being affected at all. Our engine is a different tune, heads, intake, compression ratio and has an oil cooler.
So, has anyone had to have their 5.0 replaced and how many. Are we talking one or two or tens and hundreds? Let's find facts instead of internet stories.
Thanks.
I have been through tons of mustang forums and there did seem to be an issue with a small number of engines from build 1&2 in the 2011 mustangs especially if tuned. However, there were not many cases and all that I could find had tunes in them boosting the engine to over the stock 412hp. I have seen several explanations, some totally bogus and since debunked but 2 plausible ones including a batch of bad cylinder sleeves. I have not heard of any F150's being affected at all. Our engine is a different tune, heads, intake, compression ratio and has an oil cooler.
So, has anyone had to have their 5.0 replaced and how many. Are we talking one or two or tens and hundreds? Let's find facts instead of internet stories.
Thanks.
I have only read about the mustangs having it so far and it was early on when they tuned them. From what I gathered it was something with the tune and the knock sensors...not sure tho. As far as i know ours has different compression intake and cams but the rest is the same.
#4
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Mike from 5 star stated that some tuners were trying to cheat and turn OFF the knock sensors, which resulted in cylinder number 8 failures. Number 8 probably got the hottest and some guys had issues. Tuning is everything these days, so stock I would not worry and if you do tune the truck, go with someone like Mike.
JPC racing has tuned stock 5.0s to over 700+ rwhp. The stock motor and computer are really good, even with Hyper internals.
I don't regret the engine choice!
JPC racing has tuned stock 5.0s to over 700+ rwhp. The stock motor and computer are really good, even with Hyper internals.
I don't regret the engine choice!
#5
^^^^^THIS^^^^^^
there were some early tunes that had timing on the edge with knock disabled that likely cracked stock pistons, and I am sure there have been a few marginal injectors on bad tunes that could have caused this as well. Like stated, stick with a proven tuner and you should be fine.
The motors realy arent that different at all, the intake is actually the same (minus some exterior casting differences) the only real differences are the intake cams, 0.5 point lower compression pistons, the heads have a wider valve seat for improved durability, but are otherwise the same, the exhaust manifolds and obviously the tune.
there were some early tunes that had timing on the edge with knock disabled that likely cracked stock pistons, and I am sure there have been a few marginal injectors on bad tunes that could have caused this as well. Like stated, stick with a proven tuner and you should be fine.
The motors realy arent that different at all, the intake is actually the same (minus some exterior casting differences) the only real differences are the intake cams, 0.5 point lower compression pistons, the heads have a wider valve seat for improved durability, but are otherwise the same, the exhaust manifolds and obviously the tune.
#6
Senior Member
When you hear about things like this, you can't help but understand why manufacturers are getting increasingly suspicious about aftermarket "canned" tunes. There are so many tuners out there that have no regard to long term reliability, or are just plain reckless with other peoples' expensive machines. Reputation and experience is everything when you are choosing a tuner rather than price. This is also why i'm not a fan of canned tunes as every vehicle is a little different, so why should you use a tune that was designed for one particular variation in the manufacturing process?
Needless to say, I am now starting to decide what the best exhaust for our trucks is going to be. I have been a huge fan of Borla in the past, but they don't appear to be making any catback systems for our trucks. I also like Corsa too, but they tend to sound a bit too racey compared to Borla.
Needless to say, I am now starting to decide what the best exhaust for our trucks is going to be. I have been a huge fan of Borla in the past, but they don't appear to be making any catback systems for our trucks. I also like Corsa too, but they tend to sound a bit too racey compared to Borla.
Trending Topics
#9
Member
Thread Starter
There is no way I am tuning anything. I just wanted to hear about real experiences. I did my research before buying my 5.0 and in my opinion there are less problems and a higher chance of long term reliability but every time someone mentions that as a pro on the pro con list while choosing their engine someone brings up the grenading #8 problem.
I have not found a single F150 affected and only early tuned mustangs. That says to me that the whole thing should be added to the myth pile.
I have not found a single F150 affected and only early tuned mustangs. That says to me that the whole thing should be added to the myth pile.