Topic Sponsor
2011+ Engine Related Questions Sub-Forum to the new engines that debuted in 2011.

5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2014, 06:16 PM
  #151  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jgiddy
I think even the fully upgraded UPR kit would perform better with longer hoses or at least one on the clean side. I am going to modify mine to run a longer clean-side hose.
The cooler, the better as far as the condensing effect.
Tuner Boost is offline  
Old 06-04-2014, 12:15 PM
  #152  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Ford850's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,838
Received 373 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Phase 3 is underway, as I said earlier. I removed the original UPR can and replaced it with the new one. This new can has the diffuser and extension added, and I removed the mesh material on the exit side of the can per the request of Joe@UPR. I cleaned the hoses and RX can thoroughly again, but the hoses were fairly clean and dry this time. The new flow is the same as I had in phase 1. The hose comes from the engine to the inlet side of the UPR can, out the exit side of the UPR can, to the inlet of the RX, out the RX exit, and to the intake of the engine.
Ford850 is offline  
Old 06-04-2014, 04:42 PM
  #153  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by snobdds
As soon as you proclaimed that the catch can was a cure all product and will eliminate the condensation in the intercooler issue. Well...Never mind the fact the PVC system and the CAC system are totally separate. Well...never mind there is no PVC problem as portrayed. Your theory is kinda hard to take seriously.

In Business you always under promise and over deliver.
Your last sentence here, "In Business you always under promise and over deliver"

We have pretty much proven that here in every aspect of this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by nix150 View Post
nice work Ford850! I was hoping for 100% from RX but I guess you can't get completely away from some ingestion? Would this be due to the filtered vapor not being scrubbed enough? I look forward to Tuners reply on this.
I had things cleaned pretty well before starting, so I think there will be some that gets through no matter what. TB predicted the RX would catch 90% of the total, and it ended up getting 95%.


And we only claimed the RX in this test would catch "as much or more" than the can tested....yet we new it would catch 4 times as much......

Does that fall into that quote?
Tuner Boost is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 12:42 PM
  #154  
Member
 
jgiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 533
Received 50 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Whoever deleted the posts in this thread where the 5.0 catch can naysayers get completely owned by science and facts, shame on you.
Just because an argument happens and the trolls have to get put in their place doesn't mean it all has to be censored..

Last edited by jgiddy; 06-06-2014 at 01:06 PM.
jgiddy is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by jgiddy:
cartmanea (06-06-2014), nix150 (06-06-2014), phantomblackgto (06-07-2014), Tuner Boost (06-08-2014)
Old 06-06-2014, 12:45 PM
  #155  
Senior Member
 
packplantpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,964
Received 584 Likes on 404 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jgiddy

my point exactly. ignorance and contentious BS arguments are all you have.
go educate yourself and until then, STFU and GTFO of this thread.
As a so called "hater" I agree this thread is not the place for it. This is a good test and decent comparison for the effectiveness of different cans. If I was buying one to keep the intake clean, this would definitely be useful.

Doesn't change my opinion that tuner is completely wrong on the ecoboost issue, but this thread is not the place for that and I apologize for any contribution I have made to derail the thread in the past.
packplantpath is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by packplantpath:
newsnose (06-06-2014), nix150 (06-06-2014)
Old 06-06-2014, 04:50 PM
  #156  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I found this thread while doing some searching on oil catch cans. While I don't have a F150, I do have a 2014 Mustang GT with the 5.0. I read this entire thread as well as the other one on here that is titled "5.0 oil catch can" There is a lot of interesting information on both of these threads. I have been running an oil catch can on my Mustang and my fiancée's 2007 Mustang GT with the 4.6L since last August.


I bought my Mustang in mid August of last year and installed a UPR catch can about a week later. About two weeks after that we bought a UPR can for the 07GT.


In October of last year just for the heck of it I pulled the hose off of the intake port and noticed oil on it and in the end of the hose. I was not happy as I thought the purpose of the can was to catch oil. During the time I installed it and Oct., I caught quite a bit of oil in the can and was pretty impressed.


I did some more research on different brands of catch cans and bought a Bob's Auto Sports can that was highly talked about to replace the UPR on my 14GT. My fiancée hardly ever drives her car so it still had not been driven during that time period so we left it alone.


In early Feb. of this year, I finally checked my fiancée's can and it also was letting oil get to the intake port. This is when I contacted UPR about this issue with both of our cars. They had me take apart my can and take pictures of it all apart. This is when I noticed what I felt were some design flaws and I shared these with UPR. On the round diffuser, I had oil sitting on top of the diffuser on both the inlet and outlet sides. Since the wall separating both sides has a little section cut out at the bottom of the wall, I felt like it was letting oil migrate from the intake side of the diffuser to the outlet side and this oil was getting sucked through the mess and on to the intake.


UPR told me they would look into it and get back with me which they never did. Fast forward to this week and I discover that they have come out with a new diffuser design and in their online description of this product, they have similar wording about what this diffuser prevents to what I told them I thought was part of the problem.


I called UPR back and they agreed to send me a new design diffuser to try out on one of the cars to see if it helps the problem. I also discovered that they have an extension for the can but because of the space limitations under the hood of the Mustangs, I don't know if the extension can be installed.


I have not received my diffuser yet but I will be curious to see if it works. I'm not totally sure if my Bob's catch can is letting oil through or not. I checked it awhile back and it showed a slight film of oil at the intake but I did not clean the quick connect after I made the switch so it might have been from before. I cleaned it and will see if any oil film appears again. I also have a new air compressor filter I will install after the Bob's can to see what it catches. Here are a few pictures of my setups and the inside of the UPR can.


Name:  006_zpsbad7ad29.jpg
Views: 332
Size:  115.6 KB

Name:  004_zpsd6923b63.jpg
Views: 392
Size:  95.8 KB
Name:  003_zpsd082e9cf.jpg
Views: 328
Size:  103.4 KB
Name:  002_zps5c87b8e1.jpg
Views: 440
Size:  80.5 KB
70monte is offline  
Old 06-06-2014, 05:00 PM
  #157  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Here is some pictures of the cans installed on the cars.


UPR on 2014 GT
Name:  001_zps5e3c9fa3.jpg
Views: 353
Size:  125.6 KB
UPR on 2007GT
Name:  003_zps9dea2344.jpg
Views: 376
Size:  129.7 KB
Bob's Auto Sports on 2014 GT
Name:  001_zps8a871c1d.jpg
Views: 373
Size:  96.6 KB


For those of you not familiar with the Bob's can, the intake side comes in at the bottom of the can and the output side is on top. The bottom is filled with SS mesh with a round perforated diffuser on top of that. There is no mesh at the top where the output side is. This is totally opposite of how most other cans are designed. It also catches quite a bit of oil. I forgot to take pictures of the inside before I installed it.


Wayne
70monte is offline  
Old 06-07-2014, 01:53 AM
  #158  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I found some inside pictures of the Bob's Auto Sports can.

70monte is offline  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:46 AM
  #159  
Member
 
Tuner Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Received 127 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

70monte. Good observations. You will find the same with the bob's as far as effectiveness or with any of the smaller "billet" cans with similar designs (there are 20-30 made by the same 2 machine shops here in FL all the same basic design). The Bernoulli effect has to be taken into consideration and anytime you have a small can (close to 1 qt is where the speed of the flow through can slow to the point of not pulling oil through with the flow of vapors) you have a great deal of pull through that anyone can test for. Then as you saw you never want filter media anywhere near the outlet as that oil caught there is always pulled right through. Good contribution.

Last edited by ymeski56; 06-08-2014 at 03:10 PM. Reason: Off Thread topic edit
Tuner Boost is offline  
Old 06-08-2014, 08:34 PM
  #160  
Member
 
70monte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 55
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tuner Boost
70monte. Good observations. You will find the same with the bob's as far as effectiveness or with any of the smaller "billet" cans with similar designs (there are 20-30 made by the same 2 machine shops here in FL all the same basic design). The Bernoulli effect has to be taken into consideration and anytime you have a small can (close to 1 qt is where the speed of the flow through can slow to the point of not pulling oil through with the flow of vapors) you have a great deal of pull through that anyone can test for. Then as you saw you never want filter media anywhere near the outlet as that oil caught there is always pulled right through. Good contribution.

Thanks. I found your observations and input very interesting. I'm not sure if I'm going to continue to run the Bob's can on my car. I don't know if the RX can would work on my car as there is a limit to where these cans can be mounted. I have followed Ford 850's test and it seems that even the RX can is letting some oil through so I'm still unsure of what to do.


I'm probably going to be using the new diffuser that UPR is sending me on my fiancée's car since I still have the UPR can installed on it and see how that works. I won't be putting the mesh in the output side of the can on your recommendation.


Anyway, thanks for your contribution to this subject.


Wayne
70monte is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 UPR vs RX Catch Can Effectiveness Test



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 PM.