Topic Sponsor
Ford Raptor Forum This is the discussion area for the F150 Raptor.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2016, 09:46 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pat247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 538
Received 56 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WarSurfer
You're mixing and matching your data, Pat.


No 3.5l ecoboost has a cast iron block - the 6.2 is the only one.


gen 1 3.5l ecoboost engines have aluminum blocks


gen 2 3.5l ecoboost engines have CGI blocks and aluminum heads


both gen 1 and gen 2 ecoboosts have DI but gen 2's also have port injection.


the gen 2 in the Raptor is the 'same' engine that is in the Ford GT - different specs (cams, tune, etc... but they are both gen 2 CGI engines)


The only engine with a 'flat plane crank' stat is the 5.2 from the GT350 - and it's a v8.
@WarSurfer I stand corrected about the blocks being different. I actually have not been reading all the speculation articles about the new raptor, ford will eventually(soon I hope) release the specs for it. That said my opening statement about the engines being completely different is accurate. How much do you think it would cost to bump the horse power on the Raptor ecoBoost motor up to the hp of the GT? My guess is in excess of $30k hence why they say the GT ecoBoost motor is a very limited production motor.
Old 03-15-2016, 09:51 AM
  #12  
Administrator


 
Lenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 15,045
Received 1,683 Likes on 588 Posts

Default

With tuning technologies the way they are, I don't imagine it would be hard at all to get the Raptor EB nearly up to the GT in horsepower specs. Heck, Franchi has/had a gen1 EB F150 with only bolt on mods and a tune and he got his up over 400 whp IIRC. He hasn't given us an update on it in a long time.
Old 03-15-2016, 10:31 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
snobdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 652
Received 189 Likes on 119 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pat247
@WarSurfer I stand corrected about the blocks being different. I actually have not been reading all the speculation articles about the new raptor, ford will eventually(soon I hope) release the specs for it. That said my opening statement about the engines being completely different is accurate. How much do you think it would cost to bump the horse power on the Raptor ecoBoost motor up to the hp of the GT? My guess is in excess of $30k hence why they say the GT ecoBoost motor is a very limited production motor.
This is still not right. Read again what WarSurfer said. He is 100% correct. It's the same engine with a few tweaks...

Last edited by snobdds; 03-15-2016 at 10:51 AM.
Old 03-15-2016, 10:33 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
pat247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 538
Received 56 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lenn
With tuning technologies the way they are, I don't imagine it would be hard at all to get the Raptor EB nearly up to the GT in horsepower specs. Heck, Franchi has/had a gen1 EB F150 with only bolt on mods and a tune and he got his up over 400 whp IIRC. He hasn't given us an update on it in a long time.
First let me say, I like the ecoBoost motor and I have owned two F150's with the gen 1 eB. I bought a Waggoner IC from Franchi and had an ARH y-pipe mated to a Raptor 3" exhaust system, Livernois tune. I never had it on a dyno but it would roast a set of Raptor wheels and tires. To go from that level of hp to the GT level will cost an insane amount of money. My biggest concern is with water ingestion from the IC because when that happens it is scary if you happen to be merging into heavy traffic on an interstate highway. I can tell you from experience that riding in a bucking coughing no power F150 that feels like it has four flat tires in rush hour traffic is not something I want to experience ever again.
The following users liked this post:
Slimchachachi (05-09-2016)
Old 03-15-2016, 01:14 PM
  #15  
Member
 
shelteredraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Long Island
Posts: 55
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

are you saying the intercooler brick let go, or the manifold going to it? I believe that has been addressed and corrected?
Old 03-15-2016, 07:09 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
WarSurfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 16,109
Received 500 Likes on 383 Posts

Default

The GT Eco and Raptor engines are the 'same' WRT being gen 2 CGI vs gen 1 aluminum and 'all new'. My point was the Raptor Eco is not a modified gen 1 Eco, it is totally new. The GT Eco is different in that it was specifically designed with road racing in mind. Different heads/cams/intake/turbos...

It's a very similar discussion as the Raptor R 6.2 vs the production 6.2. Similar architecture but not exactly the same. You can make an R engine out of a production 6.2, but not without taking it apart.
Old 03-24-2016, 03:16 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
AbitaPro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,193
Received 241 Likes on 172 Posts

Default Totally New EB Engine

Seems like you two got the new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost engine figured out.

Do you know if Ford has really got the IC water in engine issues resolved with the new engine? Now it is designed for the deserts, not much humidity or rain there, but elsewhere, especially down South, a solution would be great!
Old 04-11-2016, 04:47 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
EcoRaptor13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: santa monica mountains
Posts: 124
Received 23 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AbitaPro
Seems like you two got the new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost engine figured out.

Do you know if Ford has really got the IC water in engine issues resolved with the new engine? Now it is designed for the deserts, not much humidity or rain there, but elsewhere, especially down South, a solution would be great!
i have a 5-star-tuned 2013 3.5L EB, and i have experienced the moisture issue after a prolonged uphill freeway acceleration. 8 miles of uphill at 80mph. then a couple of hoots and i had a honda civic engine. the moisture is evaporated from the fast moving air going into the engine in any climate. I put a full race BOV and huge intercooler on it and it hasn't done it again. i think that helped, but it wasn't my intended point. I'm tired. the point is, moisture will accumulate in any climate, arid or humid, and a PCV bypass seems to be the common response by aftermarket manufacturers to quell this problem. it sure is a fast engine. I've always been a V-8 guy, but this thing is truly impressive and I'd hazard a guess that most of the haters haven't driven one yet. Honestly, I went to the dealer to buy a 6.2L v8 and test drove one. it was great. then he said, "just for sh*ts and giggles, wanna see this new ecoBoost?" so, having nothing but time to lose, I said "sure". we didn't make it out of the parking lot and I had made up my mind. the truck felt lighter, more peppy, and when i hit the throttle our heads hit the headrests in half the time as the V8. you could clearly feel the weight difference. but yes, it lacks the rumble dumble of the V8. heres some shots of my eco-raptor
Attached Thumbnails 2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3272.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3352.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3379.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3386.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3395.jpg  

2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_3406.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_0497.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_0511.jpg   2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine-img_0498.jpg  
Attached Images  

Last edited by EcoRaptor13; 04-11-2016 at 07:37 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by EcoRaptor13:
domboost (10-03-2016), PARIAH (05-11-2016)
Old 05-08-2016, 12:11 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
ilkhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 278
Received 48 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pat247
@WarSurfer I stand corrected about the blocks being different. I actually have not been reading all the speculation articles about the new raptor, ford will eventually(soon I hope) release the specs for it. That said my opening statement about the engines being completely different is accurate. How much do you think it would cost to bump the horse power on the Raptor ecoBoost motor up to the hp of the GT? My guess is in excess of $30k hence why they say the GT ecoBoost motor is a very limited production motor.
Swap the turbos (raptor turbos are probably a little smaller than the GT turbos), swap for a bigger IC, and tune it and you can probably hit the 600HP mark easy. Turbo engines are really easy to add horsepower to. Just add boost.
Old 05-09-2016, 12:38 PM
  #20  
Cowboy of the Skies
 
WestsydeGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 964
Received 167 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daytoman
yep, as inappropriate as a EB is for a regular half ton truck, it's downright stupid for a Raptor. But Ford is ***** deep in EcoBoost so they are trying all they can to keep it relevant . Datum shame about this Raptor.....
I am like you in this regard.
As a former Raptor owner I was all excited to buy a new one.
Then saw no V8 engine, and was very disappointed.
There will not be a new Raptor in my future unless Ford steps up to the plate with a 5.0 or 6.2 option.
The following users liked this post:
Slimchachachi (05-09-2016)


Quick Reply: 2017 Ford Raptor, new H.O. 3.5L Ecoboost Engine



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.