Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

A/C vs Gas Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2017, 09:02 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Aaronpc2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 44
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A/C vs Gas Mileage

does anybody know how much gas mileage is used with the a/c? Some vehicles it's better for the mpg to use the a/c and other get better mpg with the window down. Any thoughts?
Old 07-12-2017, 09:05 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Ricktwuhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 14,966
Received 5,989 Likes on 3,553 Posts

Default

There is no vehicle that gets better gas mileage with the window down. AC impact, vs. window up, should be about 1 MPG.
The following users liked this post:
BCMIF150 (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 09:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
F150ken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 181
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Yea, about my gut feel/experience 1 mpg.
Old 07-12-2017, 09:53 AM
  #4  
Super Duper Senior Member

 
tuflehundon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,804
Received 346 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Mythbuster's did an episode on this. What they determined, was A/C with windows up hurt fuel economy below 40 mph, but helped above that number. Having the windows up above 40 helped with aerodynamics enough that the power loss caused by A/C use was negated. And the difference was 1 around 1 mpg.
Old 07-12-2017, 11:33 AM
  #5  
GO SOX!
 
mandingo32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Lakeland, FL
Posts: 1,507
Received 92 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tuflehundon
Mythbuster's did an episode on this. What they determined, was A/C with windows up hurt fuel economy below 40 mph, but helped above that number. Having the windows up above 40 helped with aerodynamics enough that the power loss caused by A/C use was negated. And the difference was 1 around 1 mpg.
And us Floridians could care less what that number would be. It's too damn hot here not to run the A/C.
Old 07-12-2017, 11:45 AM
  #6  
Super Duper Senior Member

 
tuflehundon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,804
Received 346 Likes on 281 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mandingo32
And us Floridians could care less what that number would be. It's too damn hot here not to run the A/C.
Ain't that the truth. A/C is optional up north. Down here Heaters are optional.
Old 07-12-2017, 12:06 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ibd2328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Received 523 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Smaller enginges with less torque, I'm sure it hurts a larger percentage. When you get into V8's and all the rotating mass on the belt, probably <2mpg. Too many variables to test, but I would say the 1mpg-1.5 mpg is a good bet.

It's a compressor so it takes some energy to turn. I would say its on par with the engery required to turn the stock fan/clutch assembly.

Trending Topics

Old 07-12-2017, 12:09 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
white89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 20,194
Received 6,481 Likes on 4,617 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
Smaller enginges with less torque, I'm sure it hurts a larger percentage. When you get into V8's and all the rotating mass on the belt, probably <2mpg. Too many variables to test, but I would say the 1mpg-1.5 mpg is a good bet.

It's a compressor so it takes some energy to turn. I would say its on par with the engery required to turn the stock fan/clutch assembly.
I would agree, 100%
Old 07-12-2017, 04:12 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
kd4gij's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: St. Petersburg, Fl
Posts: 1,708
Received 249 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

In my 99 4.2 is about the same with or without ac. And as said here in Florida only a couple days with out ac. Now by heater is bypassed and don't miss it. Not worth pulling dash out for.
Old 07-13-2017, 08:06 AM
  #10  
I'm *NOT* Skylar...
 
10thGenScab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 391
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tuflehundon
Mythbuster's did an episode on this. What they determined, was A/C with windows up hurt fuel economy below 40 mph, but helped above that number. Having the windows up above 40 helped with aerodynamics enough that the power loss caused by A/C use was negated. And the difference was 1 around 1 mpg.
If I remember correctly, I want to say they also compared driving with the tailgate down vs. up to see what the difference would be. And I think their modeling was done with a 10th Gen F-150 too.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.