Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

Tires, what do you think about these?

Old 10-10-2016, 12:34 AM
  #11  
Now an XLT in Colorado
 
OhioLariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Woodland Park, CO
Posts: 5,285
Received 2,310 Likes on 1,501 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jbrew
That might of been what I was suppose to get or wanted. What I did, I seen what was #1 then headed up to discount tire and voiced the name I wanted, not the rating. That's probably what I did. Yea not doing that this time lol.
Yes, if your towing or hauling heavy, D or E-rated tires will likely perform better. Although some will say a half-ton truck never really needs them, I like the insurance of the stronger sidewall and overall better general construction. They do weigh more, though, and can drop your MPG.

If you're up for a little "light" reading, THIS ARTICLE gives a plethora of info on the subject of load ratings, etc.

Andy

P. S. Based on the table in that article, my '99's GY's may be Load Range "D," not "E." I'll have to look at the sidewall again.

Last edited by OhioLariat; 10-10-2016 at 12:44 AM.
Old 10-10-2016, 12:42 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,181
Received 5,527 Likes on 4,611 Posts

Default

I'm kind of leaning towards Michelins 10 ply E's.

I did pull a heavy trailer for awhile, well, it was a little over 5000 lbs so not that heavy.

So your max psi is 65 and ran 44 front, 42 rear. How did you work out that figure, is there a formula ? That's what I need to figure out.

BTW, - before I forget, -nope, didn't install the wheel well pieces yet. I'll let you know when I do.
Old 10-10-2016, 12:50 AM
  #13  
Now an XLT in Colorado
 
OhioLariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Woodland Park, CO
Posts: 5,285
Received 2,310 Likes on 1,501 Posts

Default

There is a formula based on max load rating at max pressure vs. actual load. There's also the "chalk test." Some people swear by one or the other, and others say both are crap. Who knows? I surveyed multiple sources (forums, etc.) and based my pressures on what I found most people running successfully. I checked for abnormal tire wear at each rotation as well, and never saw any.

Andy

P.S. Look forward to hearing about the extensions, and also, check out the edits to my prior post.

Last edited by OhioLariat; 10-10-2016 at 12:52 AM.
Old 10-10-2016, 01:04 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,181
Received 5,527 Likes on 4,611 Posts

Default

Thanks Andy!
Old 10-10-2016, 07:03 PM
  #15  
Member
 
bink187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 78
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

So I did some looking at the Toyo's you started with, As long as you get the LT versions you get (E1) load range and 50k warranty but not sold or reviewed at Tirerack or Discount Tire.


KO2 are still the top tire, but suck on ice. But for some reason they are listing higher than the other choices.
Old 10-10-2016, 08:26 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,181
Received 5,527 Likes on 4,611 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bink187
So I did some looking at the Toyo's you started with, As long as you get the LT versions you get (E1) load range and 50k warranty but not sold or reviewed at Tirerack or Discount Tire.


KO2 are still the top tire, but suck on ice. But for some reason they are listing higher than the other choices.
I had the earlier version of those tires in the past, same tread pattern. I'm not sure if it's identical, looks real close and I had them in 35's. I recall a lot of hydroplaning on wet roads, don't remember how they were on ice, just real bad hydroplaning.
Old 10-10-2016, 08:48 PM
  #17  
Member
 
bink187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 78
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Now that I think about it, my 88 FS Bronco would like to hydroplane on the highway with BFGs A/Ts and sucked on ice.
Old 10-10-2016, 10:10 PM
  #18  
Now an XLT in Colorado
 
OhioLariat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Woodland Park, CO
Posts: 5,285
Received 2,310 Likes on 1,501 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bink187
Now that I think about it, my 88 FS Bronco would like to hydroplane on the highway with BFGs A/Ts and sucked on ice.
Old AT's or KO2's? From what I've read, there's a fair difference between the two. That said, my old-design AT's had no problem with either scenario you mention ('88 Ranger).

Andy
Old 10-12-2016, 07:44 PM
  #19  
Member
 
swampaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 52
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I got a set of General Grabbers 195 75 16's from Wallyworld for just under $1000, They handle great and low road noise.
The following users liked this post:
Jbrew (10-12-2016)
Old 10-12-2016, 07:58 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Wolvee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,671
Received 426 Likes on 323 Posts

Default

I love my General AT2's. They are very quiet now that they are broken in and barely noticeable when they were brand new. They've been great in snow, sand, on the Hwy and in light Mud.

They didn't care for the thick backwood mountain spring mud. They had to spin real hard to excavate the mud from the tread but the truck never got stuck unless I did something wrong.

My best friend has Cooper AT3's and loves them. They are a bit lighter than mine and from what I've seen driving his Toy, they are a great all around AT.

In two years, I may make the jump to General Red Letter Grabber MT's just because I've been so happy with these Generals.

Everyone tried to tell me to go to the newer BFG KO2's but I have no buyers remorse.

Last edited by Wolvee; 10-13-2016 at 12:52 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Jbrew (10-12-2016)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tires, what do you think about these?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.