Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

This just pissed me off...lol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012, 11:42 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
pfoley12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: KY
Posts: 2,830
Received 40 Likes on 32 Posts

Default This just pissed me off...lol

This just pissed me off...lol-image-149672771.jpg

This kid doesn't know what he's talkin about!
Old 06-04-2012, 12:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
jb2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 523
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

he sounds like a pretty big puss...
Old 06-04-2012, 12:00 AM
  #3  
Member
 
soccerkrazed229's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

those diesel f150s sure are a mess, i dont blame him...
Old 06-04-2012, 12:06 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

It all depends on what you have to haul.. I'd love to see a f150 pull my 36ft Featherlite race car trailer..
Old 06-04-2012, 12:10 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ibd2328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Received 523 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soccerkrazed229
those diesel f150s sure are a mess, i dont blame him...
Good luck finding that. That 1/2 ton rear axle and leafs will hold up great with a 6.7L diesel.... not

I'm not sure the kid even knows the difference. And its 96-03 not 95-02
Old 06-04-2012, 12:12 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Carcrazygts2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,381
Received 434 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

The kid was probably referring to the 7.3 powerstrokes. The majority of 03's were 6.0's. So 95-02 was all 7.3's.
Old 06-04-2012, 12:14 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
JpEufracio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tejas
Posts: 2,622
Received 262 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Carcrazygts2
The kid was probably referring to the 7.3 powerstrokes. The majority of 03's were 6.0's. So 95-02 was all 7.3's.
7.3s were, well are the best out there.
Old 06-04-2012, 12:16 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ibd2328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Received 523 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

When you an do this in a Chevy 1500 or Ram 1500.... then I might consider changing from Ford. Our so called under-rated 5.4 has max torque (350 ft lbs/>400 n-m) at 2500 rpm. Even the 11th generation f150's with the 5.4 cant say that. I wouldn't trade my 5.4L 2v for a 5.4 3V... Not to mention our 4-speed tranny holds up ALOT better than the 04-09 6-speeds.

Ordered some 6" river rocks for a landscaping project at the house. I decided to only make one trip, so we loaded it down with 3.5-4 tons. 3000lb in the bed, 4000lb on a solid axle(4k 12ft trailer).

My truck has the 5.4 , 3.73, with upgraded leaf springs. I towed the load about 30miles(mainly up-hill) at about at 5-7% grade. Pulling out and on flat surface was fairly easy and did so without reeving over 2.5k . Up the 7% incline I was running around 2.5k-3k rpms at 45 mph. The braking was superb, although once we stopped, I could tell that it had been heating up fairly quick. Could use a good set of vented rotors it hauling a load like this long distances. The terrain around my area is very mountainous, from 2000ft in elevation up to 5500 feet. So I think my "outdated, under powered 5.4" did just fine

I had absolutely no problems hauling this. As you can tell, I exceed the capacity by a few hundred pounds. The 5.4 may not be a speed demon, but with the right rear end; you can haul about anything you can fit on a bed or hook too. Gas mileage was around 7mpg, but consider I have 34" MT's and only average 11 unloaded

Unloaded (not me driving)


Loaded with 7K






Old 06-04-2012, 12:17 AM
  #9  
Meaner than Ymeski

 
bobkyle2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 23,811
Received 819 Likes on 468 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ibd2328
Good luck finding that. That 1/2 ton rear axle and leafs will hold up great with a 6.7L diesel.... not

I'm not sure the kid even knows the difference. And its 96-03 not 95-02
Actually... 94.5-97 Where the same body style with the diesel was the 7.3 powerstroke....98-03.5 were 7.3 powerstroke
Old 06-04-2012, 12:17 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ibd2328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8,374
Received 523 Likes on 386 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JpEufracio
7.3s were, well are the best out there.
I was making the jester no 1/2 ton axle or frame can really justify over a 5L diesel enginge. The 6.0, 6.4, 6.7 or 7.3!
They also offered the 7.5 L 460CID gasoline engine. Not to mention the V10 as well

Last edited by ibd2328; 06-04-2012 at 12:19 AM.


Quick Reply: This just pissed me off...lol



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.