Are 4.6's really this gutless?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Shamokin PA.
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the 4.2 had a 95 or 98 mph speed limiter but I could be wrong. I sure would love to see 4.2 do 105 mph without a 1 mile straight away and a heavy tail wind. On a 97 ther is only 10 hp and 15 ft-lbs. of torque difference between the 4.2 and 4.6. The 5.4 makes 70 ft-lbs more torque than the 4.6 and it does it at 3,000 rpm's. 1,000rpm's lower than the 4.2 or 4.6. and thats what make the 4.6 a dog. Everyone wishs then had a V-8 and those who do wish they had a 5.4
#16
Yea there are times when I'm screaming GO! GO! GO! in my 4.6 I've got all the mods you can bolt on one. I want forced induction so bad. It actually goes pretty fast and I can go past the 120 mark, but still. I drove my dad's 250 with the works and it blows mine away. Idk, maybe I'm just used to my old 87 with a BOSS 302 (with the works of course) in it. It had a manual tranny and I could chirp my 35's in 4th going about 60. No lie. 1st gear would boil the tires with ease...
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
its got a 352 in it. the 360 and 390 werent offered in trucks until 68. I love that FE, drove it across country with about 5000 lbs in tow and another 1500 in the bed and never had a problem. only had to drop to third on loveland pass in colorado and deadman pass in oregon.
#19
5 speeds of fast
Originally Posted by bob101770
I thought the 4.2 had a 95 or 98 mph speed limiter but I could be wrong. I sure would love to see 4.2 do 105 mph without a 1 mile straight away and a heavy tail wind. On a 97 ther is only 10 hp and 15 ft-lbs. of torque difference between the 4.2 and 4.6. The 5.4 makes 70 ft-lbs more torque than the 4.6 and it does it at 3,000 rpm's. 1,000rpm's lower than the 4.2 or 4.6. and thats what make the 4.6 a dog. Everyone wishs then had a V-8 and those who do wish they had a 5.4
#20
Senior Member
Would the o2 sensor still be bad even though it did not give any codes? I was thinking my 4.6 o2 sensor was bad too because of a loss of power/mpg but it did not give me any codes so I figured it was fine.