Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

2000 XLT 5.4, 4x4: Opinions from owners?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2019, 09:45 PM
  #1  
Read a book..
Thread Starter
 
fordtruckyeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 31
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default 2000 XLT 5.4, 4x4: Opinions from owners?

I’m looking at this truck for possible purchase. Has nearly 260k miles. Could likely get for around $1,800.00
Sounds good, drives well, handles well. 4x4 engages smoothly. Only issue I can detect is occasional noise when trying to start (starter or flex plate), which I’ve found has been an issue for quite a few 5.4 owners. I would be leaving my 302 and the change to a 5.4 seems like a big change. Does anyone have experience with this particular year of the 5.4 and the F-150? Thank you.
Old 05-21-2019, 10:16 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
white89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 20,168
Received 6,471 Likes on 4,609 Posts

Default

What are your concerns? There isn't anything in particular about this year that would raise an eyebrow.

Going from a SBF to a Modular motor is indeed a big change. Much different animal.
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-21-2019)
Old 05-21-2019, 10:31 PM
  #3  
Read a book..
Thread Starter
 
fordtruckyeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 31
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

My 302 seems relatively simple when I look at a 5.4
From some videos I’ve viewed, it seems to be more complicated. The maintenance schedule seems more unforgiving than a 302. Cam phase issues in some models. Coil packs (I’ve never owned a vehicle that used coil packs).
Old 05-21-2019, 11:45 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
whomrig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 425
Received 58 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

is it clean? if ya want it, buy it.
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-21-2019)
Old 05-21-2019, 11:49 PM
  #5  
Read a book..
Thread Starter
 
fordtruckyeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 31
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Interior is excellent. A little more rust than I’d like in the bed. I’m sure the truck has seen some adventure driving. But, I can’t drive my ‘89 forever.
Old 05-21-2019, 11:52 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
whomrig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 425
Received 58 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

ok
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-23-2019)
Old 05-22-2019, 06:31 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
white89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 20,168
Received 6,471 Likes on 4,609 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fordtruckyeah
My 302 seems relatively simple when I look at a 5.4
From some videos I’ve viewed, it seems to be more complicated. The maintenance schedule seems more unforgiving than a 302. Cam phase issues in some models. Coil packs (I’ve never owned a vehicle that used coil packs).
Yes, you are correct. The 302 is much simpler. The 5.4 is a great motor though. The 2000 does not have cam phasers, so you do not need to worry about that. The term for these coils is COP's (coil on plug) rather than coil packs.... the coil "pack" is a bank of more than one coil that serves several cylinders. COP's serve one cylinder per coil. The 5.4 is a good motor, and will serve you well if you treat it right. They do like their maintenance. Anything in particular about the schedule that has you worried?
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-23-2019)
Old 05-22-2019, 07:40 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
DarrinT04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Maysville KY
Posts: 6,621
Received 1,208 Likes on 969 Posts

Default

the 302 is much simpler. it is the simple OHV or "pushrod" design while the 5.4 is a SOHC design. the 2V 5.4 does not have cam phasers so you don't have to worry about that. those years also didn't have the spark plug issues as the 3V
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-23-2019)
Old 05-22-2019, 08:55 PM
  #9  
mbb
Senior Member
 
mbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,666
Received 892 Likes on 734 Posts
Default

Generally they're great trucks
I wouldn't expect to buy a $1,800 260k truck and not put significant money in it sometime in the not-too-distant future.
If you're good with that, possibility, might be a good deal. hell, even if you drive it for one year and then have to scrap it you pretty much get your money out of it. Imo.
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-23-2019)
Old 05-22-2019, 09:42 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
white89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Utah
Posts: 20,168
Received 6,471 Likes on 4,609 Posts

Default

Overall your 89 will be a cheaper truck to own, quite honestly.
The following users liked this post:
fordtruckyeah (05-23-2019)


Quick Reply: 2000 XLT 5.4, 4x4: Opinions from owners?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:19 PM.