Topic Sponsor
1997 - 2003 Ford F150 General discussion on the Ford 1997 - 2003 F150 truck.

03 f150 4.6 power mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2017, 08:52 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
bubbabud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tonopah. AZ.
Posts: 3,380
Received 502 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

Removed cat's, O2 sensor code, no power, duh.
Old 10-09-2017, 09:15 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
rcairbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South-central Ohio
Posts: 6,548
Likes: 0
Received 486 Likes on 273 Posts
Default

No O2 sensors- really? You might have answered your own question. Pretty sure the PCM needs that information.
Old 10-09-2017, 09:25 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supersnake04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 185
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's still got the downpipe o2 sensors where they're supposed to be. but the rear ones just aren't hooked up to the exhaust, I've got them plugged in, but they're Just sitting on the frame. I need to find a set of o2 deletes.
Old 10-09-2017, 09:31 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,217
Received 5,553 Likes on 4,630 Posts

Default

Right! That's why it's way down on on power. You can't remove the cats and run it that way without being WAY down on power. So far down on power that truck won't be able to get out it's own way lol. UNLESS....you modify the tune. The only thing stopping these engines from running cat-less is the tune. So, you have to adjust the AF's to mix properly without cats. They are far outside of margins which will eventually burn that engine up if you don't. Removing all of the cats is probably one of the most foolish things you can do UNLESS,- you know everything about what your doing and cover all the bases before hand.
The following users liked this post:
Vortex (10-24-2017)
Old 10-09-2017, 10:16 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supersnake04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 185
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jbrew
Right! That's why it's way down on on power. You can't remove the cats and run it that way without being WAY down on power. So far down on power that truck won't be able to get out it's own way lol. UNLESS....you modify the tune. The only thing stopping these engines from running cat-less is the tune. So, you have to adjust the AF's to mix properly without cats. They are far outside of margins which will eventually burn that engine up if you don't. Removing all of the cats is probably one of the most foolish things you can do UNLESS,- you know everything about what your doing and cover all the bases before hand.
oh, that explains why it runs like s***. Thanks. So if I get it tuned, can it be programmed to ignore the lack of input from the rear o2s? Or will it still need o2 deletes?
Old 10-09-2017, 10:39 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Jbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 25,217
Received 5,553 Likes on 4,630 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by supersnake04
oh, that explains why it runs like s***. Thanks. So if I get it tuned, can it be programmed to ignore the lack of input from the rear o2s? Or will it still need o2 deletes?
Yes and yes. Your mileage MAY suffer without the rear O2's. They are more than just cat checkers, but that's about it. Usually mileage isn't affected with the built engines. The factory builds tend to get a little less. Now if you reinstall just the smaller upstream cats, you won't need a tune and you'll get your power back. Your still within parameter margins running just one of the smaller cats on each side. That's what most do since it is the cheap way and the vehicle is much louder. The upstream converter although smaller is more restrictive than the larger downstream. This way you can run all of your O2's and won't get a DTC IF your connections are tight...it can't leak very much in the Y, -or you'll get a CEL with this set up.

Last edited by Jbrew; 10-09-2017 at 10:47 AM.
Old 10-18-2017, 07:46 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supersnake04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 185
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Whoever mentioned lack of maintenance was right on the money, lol. I just changed the air filter (which was almost black) and the fuel filter (which was so clogged up that it barely had a trickle with the pump on, and was full of black sludge and sediment) both where factory parts. I had also changed the factory spark plugs a few weeks ago. Truck will haul *** now. Lol I was seriously surprise how much power it gained from simple maintenance that had been neglected for the last 14 years.
Old 10-24-2017, 11:31 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
comanchepilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: SoCal
Posts: 135
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

It's a truck. It's designed to haul stuff - it was never designed to be a NASCAR Truck racer. The vehicle is heavy.

I have a Cayenne V8 with 400hp - sure - that gets up and moves- weighs about the same - but its got 180 more hp. Even if you got the 5.4L V8, it was designed and optimized for towing - very torquey motors. That's great when hauling stuff to the dump - or towing a trailer - crappy if you're looking off the line power.

Why buy a 97-04 F-150 if you want spritely off the line?
Old 10-24-2017, 12:13 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Vortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 164
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

jbrew for president!!!




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.