Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

new F-150 quit after mud puddle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #111  
quarantine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by beerandnuts
Update: Ford Motor Co. covered the costs. After taking a lawsuit stance because it was going no where with your standard Ford 800 hotline, warranty people, and a couple calls by/to management, they decided to cover the costs. Nuff said. Thanks all for any small tidbits that helped. Ford finally did the right thing considering the circumstances, not one on here would have acceppted a no warranty answer if you would have gone through that mud puddle! Maybe most would have only gone as far and just accepting the no warranty answer and been really pissed off and been out the money...based on principle alone...all the way to court IF I had too! See ya.
It's good to see people scamming the system. Whether it's a truck,welfare,or whatever. I love how everyone makes us honest people foot the bill for them. Congratulations beerandnuts. You are just the kind of person that helped our country get the way it is.
For the record,you should have manned up. Grown a set and paid your bill. That's just plain pathetic.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #112  
Jason8691's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 120
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by motard1
It's good to see people scamming the system. Whether it's a truck,welfare,or whatever. I love how everyone makes us honest people foot the bill for them. Congratulations beerandnuts. You are just the kind of person that helped our country get the way it is.
For the record,you should have manned up. Grown a set and paid your bill. That's just plain pathetic.
Agreed, it was his fault but didn't want to take responsibility. I can imagine from now on he will have an uphill battle with anything he wants done to that truck. But whatever, the cost will trickle down to honest customers later on.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #113  
quarantine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
Default

Crappy thing is he is proud of it. If I were a dishonest person, I damn sure wouldn't go on a public forum and tell the world. I would keep that under wraps.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #114  
bigdog87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by ATOM
he drove thru a 6" water puddle at 25-30 mphs....not normal driving, playing with his truck, wrecked it, and wants someone else to fix it....for free

Must be a liberal
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #115  
rickyp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 2
From: LaPlata, MD
Default

He did pay for the work when he bought the truck with the warranty.

Fighting for what you think is right is not being dishonest, it is standing up for yourself and what you think is right.

The reason we have to fight for what is right is because of people that will roll over and take it up the old exit shoot and not question anything, and letting people walk all over them. Then when someone has the gonads to stand up and fight for what they think is right they call him a dis honest person.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #116  
quarantine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
Default

Make up your mind rickyp. Was he fighting for what he believed was right,or for what was right. Just because he thought he was right,doesn't make it so. When someone intentionally drives through a water/mud puddle at 30 mph,they are asking for it. You can argue that it shouldn't have happened all day long. In the end,he was wrong,and admitted so. He drove a truck through standing water without thinking of the consequences. Where in the warranty does it reference paying for someones stupidity? I obviously missed that section.
BTW,I think the whole story is crap anyways. Who in their right mind would even attempt to sue ford over a $1200? A lawyer typically requires a retainer fee. Up front. And since their isn't significant monetary gain for anyone involved,I seriously doubt a lawyer would even entertain the ridiculous idea of a suit. I think he just wanted everyone else to foot the bill for his mistake. Remember folks,what goes around comes around. Karma is a bi+ch
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #117  
ratchetjaw's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Valdosta, GA
Default

I am sorta new here and have just read this whole thread. WOW! Very entertaining. And to think must of us HONEST, hardworking folks wonder why the dealerships have to charge so much more for parts and service than other mom and pop places. Its because of guys who drive their trucks through water holes, flood out the engine and then force the dealer to pay for the damages. Go figure. If your gonna play, either learn to pay or fix if your self.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 04:25 PM
  #118  
quarantine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by ratchetjaw
I am sorta new here and have just read this whole thread. WOW! Very entertaining. And to think must of us HONEST, hardworking folks wonder why the dealerships have to charge so much more for parts and service than other mom and pop places. Its because of guys who drive their trucks through water holes, flood out the engine and then force the dealer to pay for the damages. Go figure. If your gonna play, either learn to pay or fix if your self.
I second that. Again.
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #119  
rickyp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 595
Likes: 2
From: LaPlata, MD
Default

motard1.

whatever you, me or anyone thinks doesn't matter, The P.O. thought he is right enought to fight for this.

one doesn't need a lawyure to sue anyone/ company. and it only takes a few bucks for the filing fees and some time. People sue on prinsiple all the time
Old Jul 17, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #120  
quarantine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
Default

Do you really think an individual,without a LAWYER,could sue Ford? You are way off. Suing someone based on PRINCIPLE, doesn'ttypically work. You have to have just cause. You would get laughed out of court if you told a judge,I am suing because I think I am right. He had no basis for a suit. Another thing,if he told ford he was going to sue,they would immediately tell hil to have his attorney contact them. Thats how a suit works. Once you bring a lawyer into it,there is no more room to bargain.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:57 AM.