Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

Exhaust.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #1  
SmokeStack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 5
From: Hahira GA
Default Exhaust.....

I have an 07 screw 6.5ft bed that has gibson bolt on catback system. On my old truck 07 ExCab 6.5ft bed had flowmaster catback system which I liked the sound of it better and I seemed to get better fuel economy out the old truck compared to the new truck the only difference between the 2 is the exhaust and the CAI old truck had the Airaid whistling wonder and the new truck has K&N polished tube. Do yall think that the Flows would have improved my fuel economy more so than the Gibson?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #2  
bigorangecntry07's Avatar
I wanna go fast!
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, Tennessee
Default

doubt it
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 07:03 AM
  #3  
Mod (Ret.)'s Avatar
Moderator (Ret.)
Supporting Member

 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,460
Likes: 486
From: Lake Mary Florida
Default

Personally, I don't see how one performance muffler would give any better MPG over another. Now if the pipes are mandral bended on one set and not the other, then flow increases, and therefore you'd get some slight increases, but I doubt it would be anything that would sway your buying desicion.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 09:29 AM
  #4  
GATORB8's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,001
Likes: 154
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

There's going to be a natural variation in mileage between different trucks, even if they're outfitted the same.

Remember your Screw weighs more than your Scab did.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #5  
SmokeStack's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 283
Likes: 5
From: Hahira GA
Default

Thanks yall I didn't really think of the extra weight being factor maybe a lapse in judgment on my part...... Thanks again
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
rubbinsracin's Avatar
poopin.....on this thread
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 33
Default

It makes more difference than youd thing. my dad has a company issed extended cab and i have a screw and he gets about a half mpg better than i do...on highway....but he spends 90% of his time on gravel so he gets way worse overall mpgs than i.

another thing you might think about is did your previous truck have the 355 gearset and then you jumped up to the 373s? i made that jump and noticed about a mpg decrease in the 373s

Last edited by rubbinsracin; Sep 17, 2010 at 03:27 PM. Reason: adding to post
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
JCP281's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 661
Likes: 26
From: Texas
Default

You can not compare one vehicle to another like that. To many variables to consider before picking one thing to base a judgment off of. However, I feel that the Flowmasters would not help your fuel economy due to the minor restriction that a chambered muffler brings to the table. The best exhaust efficiency will only be achieved when the path of least resistance is obtained.

Personally I find is a little silly that chambered muffler manufactures even try to push their products as power adders. A straight through muffler holds the greatest potential for gains in both power/efficiency due to simply having nothing to restrict flow.

Before I ramble on much longer: I find it highly unlikely that any muffler would cause a noticeable differential in gas mileage.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 PM.