Topic Sponsor
2004 - 2008 Ford F150 General discussion on the 2004 - 2008 Ford F150 truck.

2013 F-150 XL 5.0 Driving Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2013, 06:58 PM
  #121  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tradesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by News in
OP, if the 5.4 is at 4k rpm pulling your trailer, I'm guessing the 5.0 will be at that rpm range as well, and making more power at 4k rpm. But I could be wrong. But heck, if you have two trucks you like now, keep them bad boys. I generally try to keep mine to 200k miles.
The 5.0 Coyote is gutless at lower RPMs as I mentioned in my first post. At mid-range RPMs it finally builds power. My loaner only had a Class III hitch, not the Class IV that I have on both my trucks and it certainly didn't have a trailer brake controller so I couldn't tell you what how well this new 5.0 Coyote would perform when hauling a heavy trailer up a mountain highway. Also, I only had it (thankfully!) for a day. I would suspect that the awesome 6R80 helps the 5.0 Coyote make significant gains in performance during towing.

Originally Posted by RickyCRX
If you pull that much weight, you need to get the Ecoboost or a diesel... End of story. If you're pulling hills at 4,000+rpm, that's absolutely ridiculous if you don't think that's a "high RPM." I recently took my ~6500lb 20' enclosed car trailer up into the mountains in NW New Mexico and SW Colorado into elevations as high as 8500ft. NOWHERE did my truck exceed 2500-2800 RPM on the steepest of hills (and never had to drop more than 2 gears, to 4th, from 6th), and for the most part I kept it around 1800-2200rpm. I never dropped more than 5mph below any posted speed limit, and for the most part was 5-10mph above any posted speed limits.

The only "mod" I have done to my truck is a $600 Livernois tuner with the 91 octane tow tune, and I run premium fuel (which is about the same price as diesel).

This truck is the diesel for somebody that doesn't truly need a diesel (which is about where you are, with your 8k trailer).

For additional information, I have a 157" WB 2011 Ecoboost FX2 SCrew with Max Tow (3.73 gears and towing mirrors) Package.
I never had a chance to drive the Ecoboost, the loaner they gave me was a base model XL. I would really like a chance to drive one and evaluate it, but my next truck will be a SuperDuty anyhow.

Both my trucks are slightly upgraded, but nothing serious. More brakes and exhaust than anything and neither of them have tuners.

To me high RPM is 5000RPM+ where the motor is screaming. I stay away from that end of the spectrum whether driving empty or hauling a trailer.

If you have a tuner on your Ecoboost then you must be pushing 400HP or so. From what I have heard from other Ecoboost owners, there is some serious power to be unleashed by a tuner alone. My trailer isn't 20-feet long but it is heavier than your trailer, and no way can either of my trucks move it without pushing 3800RPM+. That is some serious torque you have in that beast, and as I mentioned before that 6R80 is a fantastic gearbox.

Originally Posted by justfun13
Wow. I have owned a 2002 5.4 with many upgrades, and my 2011 5.0 kicks butt compared to it and its stock. The 5.4 struggled just pulling my travel trailer that weighs only 4800 lbs. The 5.0 did great without a sweat and into a headwind filled with water.

I now have purchased a 5th wheel that weighs 8000 lbs. and the 5.0 pulls it great. She does pretty good even on upgrades. I have passed F250's pulling smaller trailers on upgrades and it's great to see there reactions. You really must have gotten a dog for your test drive.

I have added an cold air intake and a MBRP dual exhaust system since I started pulling this bigger trailer, which has helped even more. The exhaust is a little annoying while going up steep upgrades, but sounds pretty mean when not pulling, just like a Boss.

Sorry, but I'd have a 5.0 over the 5.4 any day!
Hey brother, if the 5.0 Coyote works out for then that's great, I'm not here to bash anyone who bought the truck at all. I'm just giving my impression from someone who tow/hauls daily and someone who owns an F-150 and a Ram 1500. You should see the thread I posted in the Ram Forumz where I am an active member. Boy did they take that one as if it were up the *****.

One thing I gotta say about the 5.0 Coyote is it sounds awesome! I don't find it annoying at all.

Originally Posted by Limitless2011
The 5.4 is the worst motor ever in a truck. Last place by far.
In regards to performance? Or are you talking reliability, fuel consumption, etc? If you have had better luck with other motors then that's great. The 5.4 Triton is a far better motor than the 5.7 Hemi non-MDS when it comes to fuel economy and overall power delivery. The 5.7 Hemi non-MDS is far more reliable and has a s**tload more torque off idle. The 5.0 Coyote has power but you better rev the b***h up if you want to get it. Just like I mentioned on my thread, I drove a lightweight XL and I still needed to step hard on the gas. Maybe 3.73:1 gears would have helped, but I doubt it.

Originally Posted by theoldwizard1
I worked in Ford Powertrain Engineering shortly before both of these engine came out. For those of you who wonder why this engine is in a truck at all, I'll tell you the story as I heard/remember it mixed with some bit from the 'net. My memory is rusty so don't take this as "gospel truth".

F150 basically got a different intake manifold and cams to produce more torque, lower down.

So you are correct, the new 5.0L was never aimed at the truck market. It is highly unlikely that Ford will make any significant modification to the 5.0L to improve low end torque.
If anything makes up for the 5.0 Coyote's lack of low end torque, or at least tries to make up for it, it's the awesome 6R80. I just can't begin to explain how fantastic that gearbox is compared to the 4R75W or the 545RFE.
Tradesman is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 07:06 PM
  #122  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tradesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Billlh
I'm with you on this one. I had a 07 Expedition with the 5.4 and now a 12 F150 Super Crew Lariat short bed 5.0 and it's like night and day difference. I'll take the 5.0 and day of the week. My guess is the OP drives spikes with a tack hammer too and can't figure out why it's so damn hard! Why the hell anyone would buy a F150 for his work loads is beyond me. F250 would be the bare minimum. Try using the right tool for the right job and stop dissing the F150. The 5.0 is a great motor plenty of power for normal loads and driving. Some idiot pulling 8000 lb trailers up a mountain daily with a F150 should have his head examined. That's a job for a diesel.

Bill
I would know more about driving spikes and using the proper tools and equipment than you ever will. And if you're wondering why I'm using two half tonne trucks to do the work that a 3/4 tonne truck would do it's basically comes down to business mathematics. If you don't know business and you don't know mathematics I'll explain it to you. If you can spend $20,000 on a vehicle that will perform almost as well as a $50,000 vehicle then you will spend the money on a lower priced vehicle. If you take variables such as timing, financing, performance, cost of ownership, maintenance and downtime into the equation and the $20,000 vehicle works out for you then you will purchase that $20,000 vehicle. That's what I did, and my business has been very successful by owning two vehicles that can operate almost as well as $50,000 vehicle.

Now those figures are not realistic as I paid far less for my F-150 and Ram 1500 than $20,000 and a new SuperDuty is around $70,000. Those figures are set as an example.

As a business owner as well as the primary operator of both vehicles, I can do the tasks that I need to accomplish safely and quickly with the vehicles I own and the way that they are set up. Obviously I can do the job better with a diesel, but since that isn't a financial option for me at the moment and considering how successful I have been at using my F-150 and Ram 1500 then I would continue to do so. 8,000lbs is nothing when you have the proper set up and do it properly. And I do it every day without any issues.

Any idiot knows the difference between saving money and wasting it. Maybe even you?
Tradesman is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 07:14 PM
  #123  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tradesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stealth FX4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uh, you got a lemon dude, either that or you broke it in like a wus. Hater!
Wow man, that's not cool.

Originally Posted by Grandpa's Grocery Getter
Angelo I call bull Crap on the comparison...lol..Brother you better take mine for a drive.......LOL

I have both 5.4 and 5.0......
I will admit when I first got my truck it seemed bagged until 2200 rpm but after that it came alive....and I still only have 5,900km's on it so its not even close to being broken in....

I added a k&N kit and wow what a difference, it changed my shift points and now my 5.0 has a lot of bottom end torque it was missing....and I have 34" tires to boot....lol

our 5.4 is a snappy engine, but when I drive our FX4 it rides rough, doesn't handle as good, probally cause of the Pirelli's
there is no comparison between my 2 trucks ,my 2012 is Outstanding in every way...

Maybe the bottom end XL is not what you want, but your compairing a Bottom feeder to your FX4.......that's not even in the ball park.....
Brother I can't go from a loaded FX4 to an XL. That's like me losing my lead hand and having a labourer as a replacement.

The 5.0 Coyote is mismatched to the 6R80. Great gearbox, but disappointing engine. Not to knock on what you have though, your truck rocks. I was just expecting a whole lot more power. I have the old 5.4 Triton rated at 300HP. Since I have 200,000km with busted cam phasers and failing coils I probably have something like 260HP. The 5.0 Coyote didn't want to take off nearly as well as either of my high mileage trucks. I was just hoping for a lot more juice. The juice comes, but you really gotta put your foot into it!

Oh yeah, those Pirellis are s**t tires. BFG makes an awesome tire. I got them on my Ram 1500.
Tradesman is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 07:48 PM
  #124  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tradesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CapnRedneck
After reading the op I am now firmly convinced that Mr Garrison was right on the money... While I have my own complaints on the truck (2011 RCSB 4x4 5.0 3.73). The 5.0 is absolutely NOT one of them. Bone stock with the exception of Red Line oil in the cases I get 9.20's easily in the 1/8 and 14.40's-14.60's (at over 2000ft and yes I have time slips) in the 1/4. Id dare say it will pull your Hemi and your 5.4 thru the 1/4 faster than either of them would wheeze their way through it. Gutless? LoL I owned a 5.4...so lets not go there. BTW Did I mention I get over 20 mpg? Again the 5.0 would get better mileage than the 5.4 while towing the 5.4...
I never mentioned 1/4 mile times or 0-100km/h or any type of statistic like that. I specifically noted that I wouldn't quote those at all because this driving impression was for those of us who use our trucks for work, not simply hanging out at Starbucks talking about who's got the fastest 1/4 mile times. The 6R80 is an awesome gearbox that would spank either my 4R75W or 545RFE and when mated to the 5.0 Coyote I'm certain the new F-150 is a much faster truck. I wouldn't be confident that the new F-150 with the 5.0 Coyote would be able to suit my work needs as my current F-150 does. That's what this thread is based on.

Originally Posted by Billlh
Actually I wasn't referring to you with that statement. The OP was claiming he hauls a heavy trailer into the mountains daily with a F150. To me that is idiotic, buy the right tool for the job. Occasionally hauling a heavy trailer is a completely different thing. You probably have the right tool for what you're doing. The F150 is a great all around truck and for the occasional hauling it is fine up to the limits it's rated for.

Bill
I don't "claim" to haul a heavy trailer. I do haul a heavy trailer, period. If you want pics of it check out Express Custom Trailers, based in Parksville, BC. They custom made a trailer that has a GTWR of 10,000lbs. Neither of my trucks would be suitable for hauling that kind of weight so I limit it to 8,000lbs. And I have jobsite all over the province, and I take the Coquihalla Highway with this trailer regularly. If you don't know what the Coquihalla Highway is, check out "Highway Thru Hell" on Discovery. I take that very same highway.

If you don't do the same kind of work with your trucks then you don't know what the meaning of "capable" is. I'm not going to bash anyone on this forum and call them an idiot for taking their trucks offroad in severe conditions that were meant for a Raptor rather than one of our trucks. When I see another brother on this forum jacking up his truck with a lift kit and taking it offroading, I congratulate him because he's having fun doing what he wants to do to his truck. I do what I want to do to my truck, and that's make money.

I don't have a lift kit. I don't have mudders. I don't have anything fancy like that, because my trucks are tools for profit. Without the proper tool, my business won't profit. Simple equation, eh?

When you call me an idiot for using my truck the way you would personally use a diesel you can basically tell everyone on this forum who has put time, money and effort into upgrading their trucks into offroad beasts that they're idiots as well. Everyone has their own use for their trucks, and as long as they're safe about it then it isn't your concern.

Originally Posted by superdutyfan
Well Bill if you had read it is his opinion and not trying to insult anyone. So why are you running your mouth and insulting Tradesman ? He has helped out a ton of guys including myself on working on our trucks. So for someone like yourself who has 2 posts maybe you should just read the posts and keep YOUR OPINIONS TO YOURSELF. I for one enjoy reading a good debate on these forums weather I agree or disagree it is good reading till guys like you start hurling insults.

SDF
Thanks brother! Hope all is well with your ride.

Originally Posted by msmith
I agree, flogging of a perfectly good engine, the 5.4, is unnecessary. The OP, however, presented his opinion as if it were gospel and basically flogged the 5.0. That and the language he used in mixed company to describe a perfectly functional system, the turn signals, is a manifestation of immaturity. Otherwise, you are correct, everybody has an opinion, and they like what they like. We should respect that and I respect everyone for their preference in motors. Honestly, I would have bought a 150 if they still only offered the 5.4, but I am glad that they now have the 5.0.
I never once presented my opinion as gospel. It is an honest write up on my driving impression. And what makes you think that my dislike for the new turn signal is immature? So I don't like it, that makes me immature? In the the time I've been on the forum contributing to other members what I ever posted anything immature? I think not. If you think that it functions perfectly, great. Good for you, maybe you're older and more wise than me.

Take a trip to your local dealer, drive a new Ram, a new Chevy and a new Ford. Hell maybe drive a new Tundra while you're at it. Then spend time to evaluate the trucks and possibly do a write up to contribute to the other members on this forum. And then on your thread I'll call you an idiot like Bill called me an idiot, and I'll call you immature and tell you that your opinions are gospel. But then again I'm really not immature or an idiot so I wouldn't lower myself to do such a thing. The numerous thanks I have on my sig is from other members who appreciate the helpful things I have done since being a member here.

This thread wasn't meant to **** anyone off, it's my feel for the new truck and my likes and dislikes about it.
Tradesman is offline  
Old 08-15-2013, 07:49 PM
  #125  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Tradesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 103 Likes on 94 Posts

Default

Too bad this thread is getting out of hand. Any mods up to locking this one up? I'm not going to apologize for this one. I never called anyone immature or an idiot. People get pissed off and offended because I didn't like the newer XL trim, new turn signals or the performance of the 5.0 Coyote.

Funny thing is I posted this exact thread on the Ram Forumz site that I visit and it never got out of hand.
Tradesman is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Irishjew (08-15-2013)
Old 08-15-2013, 08:20 PM
  #126  
Registered User


iTrader: (2)
 
kozal01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 9,107
Received 1,389 Likes on 664 Posts

Default

Im closing this per the OP's request. Its too bad you guys cant have a discussion without getting personal.
kozal01 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by kozal01:
Irishjew (08-15-2013), windwalker (04-02-2015)



Quick Reply: 2013 F-150 XL 5.0 Driving Impressions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.