Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2014, 10:37 AM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
undereradar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fxd
this may sound stupid but is there a 275 width tire that looks wider than other 275s?some of them have tread on the sidewalls and in some pics they look wider to me.
YES!!! the Cooper ST MAXX 275/70/18 are 11.2" wide which are the same width as a 285/65/18 Nitto.

Check it out http://www.treaddepot.com/tire/90000003099.html

Im actually in the process of trying to find my look and the Black Ford on page 1 is what I want my Black Ford to look like. Except the BFG KO's throw too mny rocks for me as I live on a gravel road. The look GREAT. So I think Im gonna level and go with 275/70/18 ST MAXX on Stock rims
Old 07-11-2014, 11:46 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,813
Received 482 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

I have 275/65r20's (2" taller than stock) on my leveled FX4 ... and from the front, they do appear a tad thin ... but from every other angle, they look great. If I had to do it over again, I'd probably go 295/60's, or MAYBE 305's ... not sure. See pics below.

Name:  20140425_152517.jpg
Views: 2241
Size:  126.6 KB

Name:  20140417_075832.jpg
Views: 2418
Size:  126.1 KB

Name:  f023dbbd-07fe-4953-89ae-af3599890bd4.jpg
Views: 2119
Size:  108.6 KB
Old 07-13-2014, 09:50 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
undereradar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wiggum
I have 275/65r20's (2" taller than stock) on my leveled FX4 ... and from the front, they do appear a tad thin ... but from every other angle, they look great. If I had to do it over again, I'd probably go 295/60's, or MAYBE 305's ... not sure. See pics below.








What level kit are you running. Yours looks perfectly level. My truck measurements are Only 1 inch difference in the front and rear fender wells. I don't want the nose up look. Can u provide me with ground to fender well measurement for front/ rear on level ground??
Old 07-14-2014, 09:55 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Wiggum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,813
Received 482 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by undereradar
What level kit are you running. Yours looks perfectly level. My truck measurements are Only 1 inch difference in the front and rear fender wells. I don't want the nose up look. Can u provide me with ground to fender well measurement for front/ rear on level ground??

The kit I'm running is the AutoSpring 1.5" kit up front, and their 2" rear block.

Up front, the 1.5" kit gave me about 1.75" of actual lift. Don't ask me how that works, but it's common that you get a little more out of the kit than advertised. I think it has something to do with the geometry of the struts & control arms.

The stock rear block on my 2014 FX4 is about 1-1/4" to 1-3/8" ... so by swapping out the blocks, I got a little more than 1/2" of lift/level in the rear.


Now, as for the true, actual measurements. When I measured (prior to ordering my kit), I did so by measuring from the tops of my tires to the lip of my fender wells. The measurements I got (pre-lift/level) were 7-1/4" up front, and 9" at the rear. So I had about 1.75" of rake from back to front when I bought the truck.

That's why I ordered the 1.5" kit ... a 2" kit would have put me nose high for sure. The 1.5" kit ended up putting me just about dead-nuts level, but just a TAD nose-high. So, I ordered up the 2" rear block, which put me back to about 1/2" of rake, which is what you see in the pics above.

The end result is exactly what I wanted in the first place. I'm running stock width, but 34" tall tires on the FX wheels. I think a little wider tires would have been appropriate, but I have no real complaints. I may do some wheel spacers to push the stance out a tad wider, but I'm still unsure about doing that.

Hope that helps answer your question(s).
The following users liked this post:
eng45ine (09-09-2014)
Old 07-14-2014, 10:02 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Z7What's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 6,130
Received 871 Likes on 695 Posts

Default

That size would be just as wide as the factory 20" tire and 1.1" taller. 33.1X10.83

Which is basically what I have. (275/60R20 = 32.99X10.83)

Wayne
Attached Thumbnails Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-1012701306.jpg  
Old 07-14-2014, 10:05 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
summertop511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,003
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

The great thing about 275's is the rocks don't fly up the side of the truck. I would take the running boards off. Looks way taller
Old 07-14-2014, 10:42 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Nckeith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I'm running 275 70 18 cooper at3"s with fox 2.5 and custom rear springs. To be honest they are too narrow. I got the tire about 4 months before the suspension and I regret going that narrow. I have been racking my brain trying to decide on sizes. So far I'm leaning toward 295 70 18 st maxx, however this would require a re-gear to 4.10 since my stock gears are 3.55. I could go 295 65 18 duratracs, if they were available anywhere and save the cost of the regear. Ideally the 305 65 18 could work also, but I refuse to put the awful at/ko's on my truck again. They pack full of the clay we have here in NC and they always seem to hydroplane compare to newer more modern tires. If the AT KO 2's came out anytime soon I may hold out for them. I have to make a decision by this fall.
Old 09-09-2014, 09:36 AM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
undereradar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nckeith
i'm running 275 70 18 cooper at3"s with fox 2.5 and custom rear springs. To be honest they are too narrow. I got the tire about 4 months before the suspension and i regret going that narrow. I have been racking my brain trying to decide on sizes. So far i'm leaning toward 295 70 18 st maxx, however this would require a re-gear to 4.10 since my stock gears are 3.55. I could go 295 65 18 duratracs, if they were available anywhere and save the cost of the regear. Ideally the 305 65 18 could work also, but i refuse to put the awful at/ko's on my truck again. They pack full of the clay we have here in nc and they always seem to hydroplane compare to newer more modern tires. If the at ko 2's came out anytime soon i may hold out for them. I have to make a decision by this fall.

pics ??? !
Old 09-09-2014, 09:44 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
eg78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 825
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tmay11
Check out this thread, this member has 305's and they look awesome. Hope this helps. Let us know what you decide.

https://www.f150forum.com/f38/new-11...ed-wax-157181/
Here is mine with 305's, no level.. I think they are perfect! 275's are thin but that's my opinion...








The following users liked this post:
undereradar (09-09-2014)
Old 09-09-2014, 12:25 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Mudweiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 1,261
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Here is my truck, it had a 2" Hell Bent level and 275/70R18 BFG Rugged Terrains. I plan to go bigger with my next set if tires.
Attached Thumbnails Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-2650944252.jpg   Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-1712014277.jpg   Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-1681768139.jpg   Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-2984080378.jpg   Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?-image-2115671368.jpg  



Quick Reply: Will 275/70/18s look thin with 2" level?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.