Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Video on Ford Service Department Opinions on Eco or 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2017, 01:36 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
BACK2GAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 225
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts

Default Video on Ford Service Department Opinions on Eco or 5.0

As someone with a 2013 5.0 FX4 I have been contemplating a 2018 model and the different engines that are available.

To be honest I've been considering an Ecoboost or possibly the new diesel, BUT...maybe not.

Came across this video. It's interesting hearing from guys that see more of these trucks than anyone of us likely ever will. That being said, take it for what it's worth.

I routinely go between 2 dealerships for my service needs. One close to work and one near my home. I may take a little informal survey of my own.


The following 2 users liked this post by BACK2GAS:
jjkjr (07-30-2017), N3UP (07-27-2017)
Old 07-27-2017, 01:49 AM
  #2  
FX4RoadWarrior
 
tanked_darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,816
Received 493 Likes on 352 Posts

Default

I don't actually trust ford technicians. Maybe a master tech, but regular ones no.

2 reasons:

-I'm a mechanic myself
-I've been lied to and ****ed around by a Ford dealer service department
The following users liked this post:
eddlestone213 (07-28-2017)
Old 07-27-2017, 06:55 AM
  #3  
Is it Friday Yet?

iTrader: (1)
 
soaringfalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 6,444
Received 580 Likes on 440 Posts

Default

I like the part where he says the 5.0 has more power and torque!

Nothing against the 5.0, but he definitely does not know what he is talking about.
Old 07-27-2017, 08:37 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
N3UP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 466
Received 86 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

A lot of the same opinions I had when I decided to stick with my original plan to get a 5.0.
Good power, simpler when repairs are needed and more reliable.

Some of those guys didn't even hesitate when asked!

With the boosted engines, you have to be in the throttle all the time and up on the boost to get the power, with NA it's just there...
I'm not afraid of running the rev's required to get the power.

The EB guys love their motors too, and that's fine, but I'd rather listen to that sweet music the 5.0 makes when she's working out.

Coyote power for me, thank you very much.
Old 07-27-2017, 09:23 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Missmy06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 632
Received 214 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by N3UP
A lot of the same opinions I had when I decided to stick with my original plan to get a 5.0.
Good power, simpler when repairs are needed and more reliable.

Some of those guys didn't even hesitate when asked!

With the boosted engines, you have to be in the throttle all the time and up on the boost to get the power, with NA it's just there...
I'm not afraid of running the rev's required to get the power.

The EB guys love their motors too, and that's fine, but I'd rather listen to that sweet music the 5.0 makes when she's working out.

Coyote power for me, thank you very much.

I agree completely. The 5.0 is definitely the superior engine. I have an Ecoboost and I know exactly what your talking about when it comes to having to be on boost to make power. You just can't beat an N/A V8 for power or reliability. As far as reliability, no one knows better than the guys that fix them for a living. The Ecoboost is job security for Ford technicians.
Old 07-27-2017, 09:43 AM
  #6  
Member
 
chuddly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 81
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Having only owned a 5.0 but driven the EB also I will say that I think both motors are good. Both have plenty of power, both tow loads and the fuel mileage between the 2 isnt worth bickering about. I own the 5.0 because I like a v8 and I got a good deal on it. Not to say I hate the TT v6 and I would have taken that also. I prefer the (more) simplistic 5.0 also without the turbo as an extra thing to go wrong (they have not been troublesome from what I have heard though). Short answer both are great engines but if given a choice I would go with the 5.0 also for good noise reasons, simplicity, and 'Merica (LOL that lase one is just for fun).
Old 07-27-2017, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Pacific Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 523
Received 51 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Results do not surprise me a bit.
Old 07-27-2017, 11:59 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
bassJAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,601
Received 289 Likes on 236 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by N3UP
With the boosted engines, you have to be in the throttle all the time and up on the boost to get the power, with NA it's just there...
What? I can scoot along all day and keep in front of traffic and never have to dive very deep at all into the throttle to do so.

I'd say it's the opposite, with a NA engine you need to get in the throttle and rev to make power, with the ecoboost it's just there.
The following users liked this post:
06screwlariat (07-28-2017)
Old 07-27-2017, 01:07 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

 
SteveLord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5,193
Received 884 Likes on 672 Posts

Default

No weep hole needed.
Old 07-27-2017, 11:25 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
2ndchance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 220
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I drove a 2016 5.0 rental while my backup camera was being fixed. There was not instant power and torque down low, you had to get into the throttle. The most annoying thing was the truck constantly downshifting while going uphill on overpasses. It did this while I had the cruise control on. My 2013 EB with the 3.31 gear does not do this, maybe due to the low end torque.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.