Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V8 vs EcoBoost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2015, 02:33 PM
  #281  
FX4RoadWarrior
 
tanked_darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,816
Received 494 Likes on 353 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sterlingone
Well, now that another thread has deteriorated into two keyboard ninjas contributing nothing.........seems sometimes we just can't have nice things here.
Time to shut this down I think.....
Until next week!

tanked_darren is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Adobe2X (02-26-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 04:46 PM
  #282  
Member
 
Deathroe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 66
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I owned a 2012 5.0 tuned by 5 star and had no complaints about the motor. Traded it in on a 2014 Eco after test driving...yea the stock eco had that much more power This is a dyno from 5 star and both motors blow away previous Ford motor's BTW a tuned eco is just stupid fun Sorry but had to add my experience


Name:  564871_354234714670897_339475085_n_zps9v3l5xnj.jpg
Views: 44
Size:  49.1 KB
Deathroe is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 05:06 PM
  #283  
Member
 
mikegt87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 74
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deathroe
I owned a 2012 5.0 tuned by 5 star and had no complaints about the motor. Traded it in on a 2014 Eco after test driving...yea the stock eco had that much more power This is a dyno from 5 star and both motors blow away previous Ford motor's BTW a tuned eco is just stupid fun Sorry but had to add my experience


Nice! Being an engineer I love data and charts.

I've often wondered why manufacturers list 'peak power' when they list specs. I think a more realistic rating would be to rate 'average available power'. That is, the average power the motor will generate at any point in its RPM range if given full throttle. Yes, if listing power ratings like this the numerical values listed would come down greatly but would much more accurately reflect a motors ability, especially for towing.

The reason a stock eco-boost is better at towing than the stock 5.0 is it has a greater 'average available power' when not revved up near redline then the 5.0 due to its flatter torque curve. This is also true for diesel motors, although good gearing will go a long way towards staying out of the areas of RPM curve where the power output is very bad.


Given the dyno data in spreadsheet form for torque or power, it would be simple enough to calculate this. A lot of other devices manufactures in different classes are forced to represent this 'average' power rating, one primary example being stereos. The max power is near meaningless, the RMS power is what matters.
mikegt87 is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 05:09 PM
  #284  
FX4RoadWarrior
 
tanked_darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,816
Received 494 Likes on 353 Posts

Default

The reason manufacturer's list peak power is because it's the biggest looking number. Simple economics you know? Bigger numbers look better and lots of people just don't know and as a result they think, "I got all this HP!"
tanked_darren is offline  
The following users liked this post:
130428 (02-26-2015)
Old 02-26-2015, 05:27 PM
  #285  
Member
 
mikegt87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 74
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tanked_darren
The reason manufacturer's list peak power is because it's the biggest looking number. Simple economics you know? Bigger numbers look better and lots of people just don't know and as a result they think, "I got all this HP!"
Ya absolutely. I use stereos as an example because regulations have forced them to list the average power output the amp can sustain rather than peak. Manufacturers there still try to trick you by advertising the peak power output though. Its stupid though and results in threads like this one lol
mikegt87 is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 05:39 PM
  #286  
Senior Member
 
IrishRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 633
Received 116 Likes on 79 Posts

Default

My tuned 5.4 hauls my kayak like a BOSS!!!

Seriously, both motors in question are awesome. Heck, my 2010 5.4 has been a great workhorse and has towed some heavy long distance loads without issue.

Anybody remember the 80's & 90's? Lol. How did we ever manage to tow anything??? The point is, we did. Those old enough, have done so much with so little, they can now do anything with nothing. Lol

The fact that we can even argue these awesome numbers of modern engines is a testament to how far trucks have come!

Pick one and run the wheels off her. Happy truckin'!

Last edited by IrishRed; 02-26-2015 at 05:44 PM.
IrishRed is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 05:43 PM
  #287  
Member
 
mikegt87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 74
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IrishRed
My tuned 5.4 hauls my kayak like a BOSS!!!

Seriously, both motors in question are awesome. Heck, my 2010 5.4 has been a great workhorse and has towed some heavy long distance loads without issue.

Anybody remember the 80's? Lol. How did we ever manage to tow anything??? The point is, we did. Those old enough, have done so much with so little, they can now do anything with nothing. Lol

The fact that we can even argue these awesome numbers of modern engines is a testament to how far trucks have come!

Pick one and run the wheels off her. Happy truckin'!
Haha Right ? Your sentiment pretty much echos mine. I mean even the 3.7 is putting out 300 hp. It too hauls my kayak and camping gear like a champ and gets good mpg while doing it
mikegt87 is offline  
Old 02-26-2015, 06:31 PM
  #288  
On more meds than ymeski

 
my67falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The most famous town you have never heard of.
Posts: 26,075
Received 651 Likes on 379 Posts

Default

Ok, both motors are great, kayaks are easy to haul and butt hurt is prevalent. I think we have reached the end of this threads usefulness.
my67falcon is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by my67falcon:
Adobe2X (02-26-2015), AricsFX (02-26-2015), Kenferg1 (02-27-2015), Lethal Weapon (02-26-2015)



Quick Reply: V8 vs EcoBoost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 AM.