Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V8 vs EcoBoost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2015, 09:12 AM
  #41  
Member
Thread Starter
 
nbd13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting. How much are those tunes costing? Few hundred?

Nick
nbd13 is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 09:19 AM
  #42  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,928 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nbd13
Interesting. How much are those tunes costing? Few hundred?

Nick
Probably between $400-$500 for an SCT X4 tuner and tunes. I paid under $400 for the tuner and 3 tunes during the black Friday sale.
NASSTY is online now  
Old 02-21-2015, 09:43 AM
  #43  
Member
 
mac12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 73
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I got a 2014 Screw with the EB and a 3.15 ratio locking rear axle. Like you, I didn't get it to tow, just a daily driver. The higher speed rear axle will keep the rpm down some at higher speeds and help maximize economy. JMO
mac12 is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:04 AM
  #44  
Senior Member

 
NASSTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ME
Posts: 12,006
Received 3,928 Likes on 2,509 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mac12
I got a 2014 Screw with the EB and a 3.15 ratio locking rear axle. Like you, I didn't get it to tow, just a daily driver. The higher speed rear axle will keep the rpm down some at higher speeds and help maximize economy. JMO
That seems to make a pretty good difference on a heavier truck like a loaded up crew cab. But my 2014 regular cab short bed w/4.10's gets more MPGs than my 2011 Scab w/3.73's got.
NASSTY is online now  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:21 AM
  #45  
misses 3 on the tree
 
Mike.357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knox County TN
Posts: 593
Received 83 Likes on 61 Posts

Default

Neither motor is truly tested yet
hasn't Ford been building 302's about forever??
Mike.357 is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:21 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
rickey498's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St.louis
Posts: 742
Received 130 Likes on 108 Posts

Default

I don't understand why everybody acts like the 5.0 can't tow. I just pull a trail from at.louis to philly and back,and had no problems. I've heard the 5.0 does better on gas mileage while pulling a trailer. I know it does way better than my 5.4 I had.
rickey498 is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:41 AM
  #47  
Brodozin' through life
iTrader: (3)
 
AricsFX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 6,377
Received 1,345 Likes on 840 Posts

Default

Because there's no low end torque man!!!!!!! Can't tow a trailer unless you have turbos duh!!!! 5.0 can't get out of its own way! 5.0 is gutless! dont you know?!!
AricsFX is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:44 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
BucketMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 2,219
Received 387 Likes on 274 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mike.357

hasn't Ford been building 302's about forever??
Exactly!
Not much has changed since they went from carbureted to EFI in 1980. That's like 35 years of consistent unchanged proof that this is a solid drive train. Long live the 302!
BucketMan is offline  
The following users liked this post:
MadocHandyman (02-21-2015)
Old 02-21-2015, 10:55 AM
  #49  
misses 3 on the tree
 
Mike.357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Knox County TN
Posts: 593
Received 83 Likes on 61 Posts

Default

besides any other reason, aftermarket 5.0L badges look way better than the girlie ecoboost badge.
Mike.357 is offline  
Old 02-21-2015, 10:59 AM
  #50  
FX4RoadWarrior
 
tanked_darren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 3,816
Received 493 Likes on 352 Posts

Default

5.0 is completely different as of 2011
tanked_darren is offline  
The following users liked this post:
130428 (02-21-2015)


Quick Reply: V8 vs EcoBoost



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.