Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Trade in 13 Eco for 14 5.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2013, 03:25 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
medicff0879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central, PA
Posts: 693
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default Trade in 13 Eco for 14 5.0?

Just traded in my 2011 FX4 Eco for a 13 FX4 Eco in the exact same color, but with a bunch more features that make me happy. Now after reading all of these post of concerned ECO owners with less than 10 posts to their name, and I am starting to panic and wonder if I shouldn't eat the 10-15 grand I would be upside down (or more) and just trade in for a much less troublesome, better MPG getting, and of course more powerful 5.0? I like the sound of a good V8 as much as I do my own farts, and no matter how you polish the turd, that ECO seems to sound like a V6 no matter what!!??

I am getting 14.6 mpg on average driving all over central PA, and will be leaving to go to Papua New Guinea in Jan. so it will remain parked a month while I am out of country (that part is true) While we are at it, do y'all think the ECO will have more problems than the 5.0 if it is parked for a long period of time and only started once a week? Thanks for the help, I searched the forums for "Why Cheetoh's are Orange," "Why do farts stink," and "Armor thickness of the Sherman tank," but nothing came up to help me with my panic and concern in regards to this topic? Thanks again. LOL!!
Old 12-10-2013, 03:32 PM
  #2  
Five-0 Ret.
 
Wanted33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Down South in Dixie
Posts: 5,726
Received 674 Likes on 578 Posts

Default

I knew you would come to your senses one day medic. I've always said the EB was full of hot air, and the 5.0 would put lead in your pencil.
The following 4 users liked this post by Wanted33:
medicff0879 (12-10-2013), ns_redneck (12-11-2013), ReactiveD (12-10-2013), Red13 (12-10-2013)
Old 12-10-2013, 03:38 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
medicff0879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central, PA
Posts: 693
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wanted33
I knew you would come to your senses one day medic. I've always said the EB was full of hot air, and the 5.0 would put lead in your pencil.
LOL!! Now that's funny right there!! I just wanted to make a quasi-sarcastic, yet humorous post in regards to this topic that has been beatin to death. Quite honestly, I never even test drove a 5.0, and kind of curious as to what it's like realistically compared to the ECO? I griped and complained hardcore about the lack of good MPG out of my first ECO, and still can't say that I am overly impressed with 14.6 overall. With that said, I think I can honestly feel a difference when jumping onto the interstate, between the acceleration of the ECO with the 3.55, vs the Max tow 3.73's that were in my 2011? Could be all in the mind, but seems a little less responsive, and the MPG stayed just about the same (if not worse) than the 2011?
Old 12-10-2013, 03:41 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Azuri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,749
Received 479 Likes on 333 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by medicff0879
Just traded in my 2011 FX4 Eco for a 13 FX4 Eco in the exact same color, but with a bunch more features that make me happy. Now after reading all of these post of concerned ECO owners with less than 10 posts to their name, and I am starting to panic and wonder if I shouldn't eat the 10-15 grand I would be upside down (or more) and just trade in for a much less troublesome, better MPG getting, and of course more powerful 5.0? I like the sound of a good V8 as much as I do my own farts, and no matter how you polish the turd, that ECO seems to sound like a V6 no matter what!!??

I am getting 14.6 mpg on average driving all over central PA, and will be leaving to go to Papua New Guinea in Jan. so it will remain parked a month while I am out of country (that part is true) While we are at it, do y'all think the ECO will have more problems than the 5.0 if it is parked for a long period of time and only started once a week? Thanks for the help, I searched the forums for "Why Cheetoh's are Orange," "Why do farts stink," and "Armor thickness of the Sherman tank," but nothing came up to help me with my panic and concern in regards to this topic? Thanks again. LOL!!
This guy answers all EB vs 5.0 questions, it's my go to answer every time.

Old 12-10-2013, 03:41 PM
  #5  
Beer Gut Extraordinaire

 
HCFX2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,369
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,317 Posts

Default

Old 12-10-2013, 03:44 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
medicff0879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central, PA
Posts: 693
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Azuri, that is disturbing and ALMOST as bad as "What does the Fox say!!" Video on youtube!!
The following users liked this post:
Azuri (12-10-2013)
Old 12-10-2013, 03:45 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
medicff0879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central, PA
Posts: 693
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Old 12-10-2013, 03:49 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
medicff0879's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Central, PA
Posts: 693
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I am still trying to figure out why these Ecoboost are getting worse MPG than my Pontiac G8 GT with the 6.0L and all kinds of goodies on it did? I was getting 19.8 MPG (sometimes) out of that, I am only getting 14.6 out of this truck? I don't understand??
Old 12-10-2013, 04:22 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
gillysmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 833
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by medicff0879
LOL!! Now that's funny right there!! I just wanted to make a quasi-sarcastic, yet humorous post in regards to this topic that has been beatin to death. Quite honestly, I never even test drove a 5.0, and kind of curious as to what it's like realistically compared to the ECO? I griped and complained hardcore about the lack of good MPG out of my first ECO, and still can't say that I am overly impressed with 14.6 overall. With that said, I think I can honestly feel a difference when jumping onto the interstate, between the acceleration of the ECO with the 3.55, vs the Max tow 3.73's that were in my 2011? Could be all in the mind, but seems a little less responsive, and the MPG stayed just about the same (if not worse) than the 2011?
I will give you an honest answer- to your sarcastic question. I had a 2011 5.0 now a 13 EB. both identical trucks except EB is a 6.5' box. Pulling a 3500lb boat at 75 mph the 5.0 did just as good as the EB. The EB was a tad quicker to 40mph. other than that no difference. The 5.0 got a lot better mpg's towing and driving. To say the EB has a lot more power would not be true... it has a little more power is more like it. motor wise I would pick the 5.0 again over the EB.

if you want an honest answer to any questions let me know!

Last edited by gillysmi; 12-10-2013 at 04:23 PM. Reason: one more line
Old 12-10-2013, 04:24 PM
  #10  
Beer Gut Extraordinaire

 
HCFX2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 17,369
Received 2,102 Likes on 1,317 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by medicff0879
I am still trying to figure out why these Ecoboost are getting worse MPG than my Pontiac G8 GT with the 6.0L and all kinds of goodies on it did? I was getting 19.8 MPG (sometimes) out of that, I am only getting 14.6 out of this truck? I don't understand??
You had a G8 GT? My god...


Quick Reply: Trade in 13 Eco for 14 5.0?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM.