Tire weight question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Tire weight question
Alright, so we all know that weight, diameter, width and tread type reduce performanc and mpg, but what is the biggest factor? Reason I am curious, is I am looking to add bigger aggressive tires, but trying to determine if a lighter or narrower tire would make the "least" amount of impact. For insatnce;
Cooper STT: 35x12.50x20, actuall dimension of 34.7, 12.5" width, and about 65 lbs.
Toyo OC Mud: 275/65/20, actual dimension of 34.1, 10.8" width, and about 71 lbs.
So, the Toyo is shorter and narrower (less rolling resistance, more effective gear ratio), but weighs 6lbs more. Will the benefits of the shorter narrower tire be eaten up because it is slightly heavier? Or am I just over analyzing, because it seems that anything bigger than a 275/60/20 highway tire nets about the same mpg loss, 2-3 mpg.
Lastly, where will the big mpg hit come from, City driving or highway? My truck gets pretty abismal City mpg (like 12 mpg with a very light foot) but great highway mpg (21 mpg at 75mph) so I cant see the City get much worse, but if it did......I should have kept my Superduty!!
Anyone have any experiences, either way?
Cooper STT: 35x12.50x20, actuall dimension of 34.7, 12.5" width, and about 65 lbs.
Toyo OC Mud: 275/65/20, actual dimension of 34.1, 10.8" width, and about 71 lbs.
So, the Toyo is shorter and narrower (less rolling resistance, more effective gear ratio), but weighs 6lbs more. Will the benefits of the shorter narrower tire be eaten up because it is slightly heavier? Or am I just over analyzing, because it seems that anything bigger than a 275/60/20 highway tire nets about the same mpg loss, 2-3 mpg.
Lastly, where will the big mpg hit come from, City driving or highway? My truck gets pretty abismal City mpg (like 12 mpg with a very light foot) but great highway mpg (21 mpg at 75mph) so I cant see the City get much worse, but if it did......I should have kept my Superduty!!
Anyone have any experiences, either way?
#2
Senior Member
A larger tire will effectively give you a higher final gear.
A higher final gear will be harder to accelerate from a stop and will hurt gas mileage.
A higher final gear will lower your highway RPMs. This can give you better mileage except if it is too high then the engine will have to work harder which requires more fuel.
No matter what, a heavier tire takes more energy to get and keep spinning which will hurt acceleration and gas mileage.
A higher final gear will be harder to accelerate from a stop and will hurt gas mileage.
A higher final gear will lower your highway RPMs. This can give you better mileage except if it is too high then the engine will have to work harder which requires more fuel.
No matter what, a heavier tire takes more energy to get and keep spinning which will hurt acceleration and gas mileage.
The following users liked this post:
straightaxle (09-30-2013)
#6
I Like Tires
The weight has far more affect in MPG in my opinion. Width would be pretty negligible when you think of the actual percentage increase of total surface area touching the ground unless you go to something ridiculous like 275mm wide (10.82") to a 14.50" wide tire.
Going from a P-Metric Tire to an LT-Metric tire it's not hard to increase weight by 50%+ depending on your size increase from stock.
Going from a P-Metric Tire to an LT-Metric tire it's not hard to increase weight by 50%+ depending on your size increase from stock.
Last edited by BassAckwards; 09-30-2013 at 08:04 PM.
The following users liked this post:
straightaxle (09-30-2013)
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#10
One Bad MoFoMoCo Owner
BFGs in 315/70/17 weigh less at 64 lbs. in S speed rating, and only 62 lbs in an R. And the Duratracs are lightest at just 60 lbs each.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/CompareTires.jsp
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/CompareTires.jsp
Last edited by sullyman; 09-30-2013 at 09:45 PM.