Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Test drove a 6.2 platty..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2013, 02:07 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
LariBoost23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 480
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmoore9

Do tell! By tuning the 6.2 how much extra HP/TQ can you get? I'm hearing not much but shifting is a lot better.
Shifting ALWAYS gets better with a tune!!!!
Old 02-10-2013, 02:19 AM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Bryson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gonzales, Texas
Posts: 2,225
Received 90 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I thot the engines got much better fuel economy... My 1991 f150 302 gets like 10-12 city (sometimes lil lower when im in badass mode) but ive gotten around 18.5 highway roughly by my calculations. With 278k on the motor
Old 02-10-2013, 11:30 AM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Rockhopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 257
Received 64 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bryson
I thot the engines got much better fuel economy... My 1991 f150 302 gets like 10-12 city (sometimes lil lower when im in badass mode) but ive gotten around 18.5 highway roughly by my calculations. With 278k on the motor
Your reg cab truck weighs what? 4200lbs maybe? These new trucks weigh close to 6000lbs in crew cab form. Ya your right, its close on the mpg. You get about what I was getting last summer on my Eco. But mine weighs 1800lbs more (according to edmunds specs.) and power difference is HUGE. I had a `93 Supercab with the 302. Put any one of Fords current engine offerings in a 4200lb truck and the fuel economy and power would be awesome.

Glad to see someone, such as yourself, actually keep their truck more than a few years and put some decent miles on it.
Old 02-10-2013, 11:43 AM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
PARIAH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Devils Tower
Posts: 1,923
Received 275 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

The 6.2 is very nice but I've no regrets with the EB.
Old 02-10-2013, 12:00 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
reward69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 342
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmoore9
Do tell! By tuning the 6.2 how much extra HP/TQ can you get? I'm hearing not much but shifting is a lot better.
Overall HP gains are in the 20/25 hp range, but the major difference is the lower and mid range torque and power. From the factory you dont get full throttle until about 4K rpms due to the factory programming limiters and timers. Also the factory timing is very conservative , so this is an area where a tune really helps. Unlike the EB you dont have boost psi to increase to get the bigger overall gains, but the drivability and increase in lower rpm power are very noticable comared to stock.

Here are some excerts from 5stars website concerning timing, etc.
TIMING-Can be increased in most RPM areas for improved Torque and HP. Running a higher Octane fuel will net more power and economy from some timing/spark advancement. However, with a Raptor 6.2L V8 even running 87 Octane fuel can yield some respectable gains in power and torque over stock.

The 6.2L suffers from poor throttle response down low. In fact the factory programming has limits on the max throttle blade opening that PCM allows and is based on RPM range engine is operating in. Full throttle blade opening in factory programming is only allowed at 4500 RPMs. By correcting this issue and a few others; improvements will be much better throttle response, step on go pedal, vehicle will respond quicker...this DBW system is a torque driven system, it works by taking a certain amount of torque via engine and wheel and applies it to what the driver foot say it needs; a better way to explain it is its a torque limiter. It only allows so much torque at a given pedal position. Stock tables are conservative and numb at best and that's why one would feel some times a lag or a goofy pedal with DBW systems. For a 6.2L V8 this is one of the most critical areas that must be addressed and modified to generate more torque /hp and throttle response. By reworking the OEM strategies makes your 6.2L V8 come to life!
The following users liked this post:
jmoore9 (02-10-2013)
Old 02-10-2013, 02:04 PM
  #66  
Ford Blue Oval Guy
 
MustangMabry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Savannah, Tenn.
Posts: 427
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reward69
Overall HP gains are in the 20/25 hp range, but the major difference is the lower and mid range torque and power. From the factory you dont get full throttle until about 4K rpms due to the factory programming limiters and timers. Also the factory timing is very conservative , so this is an area where a tune really helps. Unlike the EB you dont have boost psi to increase to get the bigger overall gains, but the drivability and increase in lower rpm power are very noticable comared to stock.

Here are some excerts from 5stars website concerning timing, etc.
TIMING-Can be increased in most RPM areas for improved Torque and HP. Running a higher Octane fuel will net more power and economy from some timing/spark advancement. However, with a Raptor 6.2L V8 even running 87 Octane fuel can yield some respectable gains in power and torque over stock.

The 6.2L suffers from poor throttle response down low. In fact the factory programming has limits on the max throttle blade opening that PCM allows and is based on RPM range engine is operating in. Full throttle blade opening in factory programming is only allowed at 4500 RPMs. By correcting this issue and a few others; improvements will be much better throttle response, step on go pedal, vehicle will respond quicker...this DBW system is a torque driven system, it works by taking a certain amount of torque via engine and wheel and applies it to what the driver foot say it needs; a better way to explain it is its a torque limiter. It only allows so much torque at a given pedal position. Stock tables are conservative and numb at best and that's why one would feel some times a lag or a goofy pedal with DBW systems. For a 6.2L V8 this is one of the most critical areas that must be addressed and modified to generate more torque /hp and throttle response. By reworking the OEM strategies makes your 6.2L V8 come to life!
Good info to know.
Old 02-10-2013, 02:35 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
reward69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 342
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bryson
I thot the engines got much better fuel economy... My 1991 f150 302 gets like 10-12 city (sometimes lil lower when im in badass mode) but ive gotten around 18.5 highway roughly by my calculations. With 278k on the motor
Remember your 302 factory rating was 185 hp and your truck weighs somewhere around 4k lbs vs 411 hp and 6k lbs. Notibly you have a 4speed vs 6 spd but you get the point. I have seen as much as 18.4 on a hwy trip running averaging above 70 mph.

Twice the hp and half again the weight, for probably better average mpg? I'd take that...

BTW Im not knocking your truck, had one, it was a good ole truck and had over 120K trouble free miles when I sold it.
Old 02-10-2013, 09:26 PM
  #68  
PRO RKBA
 
6.2screw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 86
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I get a consistent 18+ mpg at 65 on cruise. Normally my 75% highway (75-80mph) and 25% city driving gets me 14.3. Towing, ugh, I'm lucky to get 10 mpg between 60 and 65 pulling my 5k RV. I don't regret the 6.2 one sec. I would buy one again. Once you EB guys get that intercooler thing fixed the EB will be a fine reliable engine too.
Old 02-11-2013, 07:47 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
lkennamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,277
Received 100 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bryson
I thot the engines got much better fuel economy... My 1991 f150 302 gets like 10-12 city (sometimes lil lower when im in badass mode) but ive gotten around 18.5 highway roughly by my calculations. With 278k on the motor
You know what would be cool... If that 1991 302 kicks the bucket swap a new 2011-13 302 engine and transmission into it. I bet that would make killer mpg. All youd have to do is junkyard one of the new 302 engines and transmissions. Or if you want to keep the manual transmission(I would I love manuals and wish i coulda had one in my 2010) swap in a 5.4 engine and manual from like 06 or 07
Old 02-12-2013, 04:55 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Bryson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gonzales, Texas
Posts: 2,225
Received 90 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rockhopper

Your reg cab truck weighs what? 4200lbs maybe? These new trucks weigh close to 6000lbs in crew cab form. Ya your right, its close on the mpg. You get about what I was getting last summer on my Eco. But mine weighs 1800lbs more (according to edmunds specs.) and power difference is HUGE. I had a `93 Supercab with the 302. Put any one of Fords current engine offerings in a 4200lb truck and the fuel economy and power would be awesome.

Glad to see someone, such as yourself, actually keep their truck more than a few years and put some decent miles on it.
I wasnt trying to rag on the new trucks, i just really thot they got better fuel mileage. And yeah ive just had it for 3 years, it was a ranchers truck on the texas/Louisiana border. Had it through highschool and dogged the hell out of it dont know it still runs lol



Quick Reply: Test drove a 6.2 platty..



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.