Topic Sponsor
2009 - 2014 Ford F150 General discussion on 2009 - 2014 Ford F150 truck.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SVT raptor wheel thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2017, 12:17 PM
  #981  
Member
 
Runningriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 45
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by glen r
Very nice. I am considering the same setup on my expedition. Are the tire LT or P metric? What do think of them so far?


I've used Yokohamas for a few years now on various vehicles (02 Ranger, '78 F150, Ford Edge, Saturn SC2) and have been really impressed with ride quality and tire life in all cases.

These tires are quiet and ride smooth. I'd say they are not the greatest tire for mud, I don't feel like the tread pattern is as aggressive as it could be. However Yokohama is coming out with an M/T 003 in July. It looks impressive and I am curious to see where they fall in pricing.

EDIT: They are P, not LT. Sorry about that.

Last edited by Runningriot; 06-28-2017 at 09:36 AM.
The following users liked this post:
glen r (06-27-2017)
Old 06-27-2017, 01:39 PM
  #982  
Member
 
glen r's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 30
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Runningriot
They are LT.

I've used Yokohamas for a few years now on various vehicles (02 Ranger, '78 F150, Ford Edge, Saturn SC2) and have been really impressed with ride quality and tire life in all cases.

These tires are quiet and ride smooth. I'd say they are not the greatest tire for mud, I don't feel like the tread pattern is as aggressive as it could be. However Yokohama is coming out with an M/T 003 in July. It looks impressive and I am curious to see where they fall in pricing.
I have heard some good things about the Geolanders A/T G015s. I just need to decide between the LT and P metric, they offer both in the 285/70. I like the Coopers I am currently running but I they seem to be showing more wear than I expected.
Old 06-28-2017, 07:59 AM
  #983  
HOPEFUL
iTrader: (1)
 
MPETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: MARYLAND
Posts: 2,088
Received 266 Likes on 197 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by glen r
I have heard some good things about the Geolanders A/T G015s. I just need to decide between the LT and P metric, they offer both in the 285/70. I like the Coopers I am currently running but I they seem to be showing more wear than I expected.
Unless you carry A LOT of weight regularly, I see absolutely no "NEED" for an LT tire. And even if you do carry weight a lot, you will overload an F150 before you exceed the weight capacity of a p-metric 265 or 285/70/17 tire.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
The following users liked this post:
glen r (06-28-2017)
Old 06-28-2017, 09:39 AM
  #984  
Member
 
Runningriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 45
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by glen r
I have heard some good things about the Geolanders A/T G015s. I just need to decide between the LT and P metric, they offer both in the 285/70. I like the Coopers I am currently running but I they seem to be showing more wear than I expected.
Originally Posted by MPETE
Unless you carry A LOT of weight regularly, I see absolutely no "NEED" for an LT tire. And even if you do carry weight a lot, you will overload an F150 before you exceed the weight capacity of a p-metric 265 or 285/70/17 tire.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
Sorry I misspoke, I went with the P metric Geolanders, not LT, for the above mentioned reasons. Corrected my original post above.
Old 06-28-2017, 09:53 AM
  #985  
Member
 
glen r's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 30
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MPETE
Unless you carry A LOT of weight regularly, I see absolutely no "NEED" for an LT tire. And even if you do carry weight a lot, you will overload an F150 before you exceed the weight capacity of a p-metric 265 or 285/70/17 tire.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
Agreed 100 percent.
I went LTs on my 01, because Kelly only offers the 285 in an LT. Definitely stiffer, and wear like Iron. I got 61000 out of the first set, and would have been more if I hadn't slacked on rotating the last 10000. I am leaning toward the P metric for a smoother ride, and less rotating/ unsprung weight. The P metric are 10 lbs lighter, 45 vs 55 lbs for the LT.
Old 07-21-2017, 11:58 AM
  #986  
Senior Member
 
tower06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 156
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dhardison
Knock-off Raptor wheels and 315/70/17 BFG KO2s (Craigslist find), with Bilsteins on max setting. Totally transforms the look of the truck from stock.





Will be doing same but with 2017 bead locks. Any rub with the Brillstein's at max? How is the ride?
Old 07-21-2017, 12:09 PM
  #987  
Member
 
dhardison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Delaware, OH
Posts: 40
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tower06
Will be doing same but with 2017 bead locks. Any rub with the Brillstein's at max? How is the ride?
Only slight rub on the plastic doohickey under the front bumper. Not enough rub to trim anything though. Rides firmer than the OEM shocks, but more controlled. The rear Bilsteins made the most difference in ride, in a good way.
Old 07-21-2017, 12:15 PM
  #988  
Village Sociopath


iTrader: (1)
 
johnday in BFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nowhereville Barton City Michigan
Posts: 28,528
Received 10,073 Likes on 6,507 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dhardison
Only slight rub on the plastic doohickey under the front bumper. Not enough rub to trim anything though. Rides firmer than the OEM shocks, but more controlled. The rear Bilsteins made the most difference in ride, in a good way.
Are those +34 offset? It looks like the front sticks out further than mine. With mine, OEM, and the same tires, along with pretty much the same lift, mine don't rub at all.
Old 07-23-2017, 03:40 PM
  #989  
Member
 
dhardison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Delaware, OH
Posts: 40
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnday
Are those +34 offset? It looks like the front sticks out further than mine. With mine, OEM, and the same tires, along with pretty much the same lift, mine don't rub at all.
Yes, they're +34 offset Raptor takeoffs. They stick out just a hair, but not much.






Old 07-23-2017, 05:01 PM
  #990  
Village Sociopath


iTrader: (1)
 
johnday in BFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nowhereville Barton City Michigan
Posts: 28,528
Received 10,073 Likes on 6,507 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dhardison
Yes, they're +34 offset Raptor takeoffs. They stick out just a hair, but not much.
I see that now, must have been just the angle.
There is another member here, ChrisFX4, that has the same setup as us, except Duratracs. When he initially put those tires and wheels on, he had a slight rub as well. Turned out, the front end was out of alignment. He had it realigned, and no more rub.


Quick Reply: SVT raptor wheel thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 AM.