SVT raptor wheel thread
#981
I've used Yokohamas for a few years now on various vehicles (02 Ranger, '78 F150, Ford Edge, Saturn SC2) and have been really impressed with ride quality and tire life in all cases.
These tires are quiet and ride smooth. I'd say they are not the greatest tire for mud, I don't feel like the tread pattern is as aggressive as it could be. However Yokohama is coming out with an M/T 003 in July. It looks impressive and I am curious to see where they fall in pricing.
EDIT: They are P, not LT. Sorry about that.
Last edited by Runningriot; 06-28-2017 at 09:36 AM.
The following users liked this post:
glen r (06-27-2017)
#982
They are LT.
I've used Yokohamas for a few years now on various vehicles (02 Ranger, '78 F150, Ford Edge, Saturn SC2) and have been really impressed with ride quality and tire life in all cases.
These tires are quiet and ride smooth. I'd say they are not the greatest tire for mud, I don't feel like the tread pattern is as aggressive as it could be. However Yokohama is coming out with an M/T 003 in July. It looks impressive and I am curious to see where they fall in pricing.
I've used Yokohamas for a few years now on various vehicles (02 Ranger, '78 F150, Ford Edge, Saturn SC2) and have been really impressed with ride quality and tire life in all cases.
These tires are quiet and ride smooth. I'd say they are not the greatest tire for mud, I don't feel like the tread pattern is as aggressive as it could be. However Yokohama is coming out with an M/T 003 in July. It looks impressive and I am curious to see where they fall in pricing.
#983
HOPEFUL
iTrader: (1)
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
The following users liked this post:
glen r (06-28-2017)
#984
Unless you carry A LOT of weight regularly, I see absolutely no "NEED" for an LT tire. And even if you do carry weight a lot, you will overload an F150 before you exceed the weight capacity of a p-metric 265 or 285/70/17 tire.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
#985
Unless you carry A LOT of weight regularly, I see absolutely no "NEED" for an LT tire. And even if you do carry weight a lot, you will overload an F150 before you exceed the weight capacity of a p-metric 265 or 285/70/17 tire.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
You have to step up to a 7 lug truck before the cargo capacity will exceed the capacity of a p-metric tire. There is nothing wrong with wanting an LT because of firmer ride or wear characteristics, but don't feel you "NEED" an LT tire because on 90% of the trucks out there it's a waste of money both in initial purchase price and extra fuel used to drive the extra weight around.
I went LTs on my 01, because Kelly only offers the 285 in an LT. Definitely stiffer, and wear like Iron. I got 61000 out of the first set, and would have been more if I hadn't slacked on rotating the last 10000. I am leaning toward the P metric for a smoother ride, and less rotating/ unsprung weight. The P metric are 10 lbs lighter, 45 vs 55 lbs for the LT.
#986
#987
Only slight rub on the plastic doohickey under the front bumper. Not enough rub to trim anything though. Rides firmer than the OEM shocks, but more controlled. The rear Bilsteins made the most difference in ride, in a good way.
#988
Village Sociopath
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nowhereville Barton City Michigan
Posts: 28,528
Received 10,073 Likes
on
6,507 Posts
Are those +34 offset? It looks like the front sticks out further than mine. With mine, OEM, and the same tires, along with pretty much the same lift, mine don't rub at all.
#989
#990
Village Sociopath
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Nowhereville Barton City Michigan
Posts: 28,528
Received 10,073 Likes
on
6,507 Posts
There is another member here, ChrisFX4, that has the same setup as us, except Duratracs. When he initially put those tires and wheels on, he had a slight rub as well. Turned out, the front end was out of alignment. He had it realigned, and no more rub.