Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans

Ford F150 Forum - Community of Ford Truck Fans (https://www.f150forum.com/)
-   2009 - 2014 Ford F150 (https://www.f150forum.com/f38/)
-   -   Solo performance EB exhaust, can I hear yours? (https://www.f150forum.com/f38/solo-performance-eb-exhaust-can-i-hear-yours-170495/)

2012 SCREW 09-02-2012 11:48 PM

Solo performance EB exhaust, can I hear yours?
 
So, anybody have a Solo 4" on their EB around the Philly PA, southern NJ, northern DE vacinity that I can hear in person? Sound clips on here don't do anything any justice. If I had my pick, I would love to hear the single 4" with the Mach 46!
Feel free to reply here or send me a PM.

As a related topic, does anyone know the performance difference with the Mach 46 vs the MR 400?

Thanks!

2012 SCREW 09-03-2012 07:54 AM

So after some more reading on the site here, I have a semi follow up question. If you had ~$700 to spend on an exhaust and your goals were most performance for your dollar and the lowest decible level, would you go cat back system, or with the high flow cats/downpipe?

rockhead11 09-03-2012 08:40 AM

High flow cats and down pipe!!

2012 SCREW 09-03-2012 10:49 PM


Originally Posted by rockhead11 (Post 2005693)
High flow cats and down pipe!!

Based on decible level or performance? Or both?

2012 SCREW 09-06-2012 11:08 PM

Anyone else out there agree or disagree?
Seen some different thoughts on other forums, but the cats seem to be more recommended as far as bang for the buck. I wish Solo would put out some dyno numbers already!

And I would still love to hear one in person if there's anyone nearby.

rockhead11 09-06-2012 11:22 PM


Originally Posted by 2012 SCREW

Based on decible level or performance? Or both?

Generally it depends but if you are asking me personally, both. Too much of anything is not always good. You can have all the power in the world but if you cant drive to the store to get milk for your 3 year old its not worth it.

rockhead11 09-06-2012 11:34 PM


Originally Posted by 2012 SCREW
Anyone else out there agree or disagree?
Seen some different thoughts on other forums, but the cats seem to be more recommended as far as bang for the buck. I wish Solo would put out some dyno numbers already!

And I would still love to hear one in person if there's anyone nearby.

It's mist likely going to gain power in the bottom and mid range of the rpm range. The computer will shut down any extra Hp by blowing off turbo psi.

rockhead11 09-06-2012 11:35 PM


Originally Posted by 2012 SCREW
Anyone else out there agree or disagree?
Seen some different thoughts on other forums, but the cats seem to be more recommended as far as bang for the buck. I wish Solo would put out some dyno numbers already!

And I would still love to hear one in person if there's anyone nearby.

It's mostt likely going to gain power in the bottom and mid of the rpm range. The computer will shut down any extra Hp on top by blowing off turbo psi.

2012 SCREW 09-07-2012 05:52 PM


Originally Posted by rockhead11 (Post 2015210)
Generally it depends but if you are asking me personally, both. Too much of anything is not always good. You can have all the power in the world but if you cant drive to the store to get milk for your 3 year old its not worth it.

Thanks, and I agree. Like I said, I'm looking for most bang for my buck, but also the least decible increase. I know, not an ideal mix. ;)

goingsolo2 09-18-2012 02:23 PM

Dyno results are posted in one of the HF cat threads by one of our customers. Thanks:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands