2012platinum

Some serious numbers being put up here. These motors are awesome!

TXGold

If you don't think there is a financial incentive for a company to put up a really big dyno pull, wake up. I don't think it's fake, but anyone that simply puts a correction factor on a dyno to convert it BACK to crank hp is a not doing it right. Go try that on any mustang, LS1, Porshche, any forum for that matter. If there are sitting ducks like you rtron they are gonna keep doing it. Why not put what the dyno made to the wheels or at a minimum a base line stock pull and try and keep things apples to apples? What parameters were used for atmospheric correction. Notice the photo of the dyno chart is cropped. If the atmospheric conditions are set incorrectly and a drivetrain loss of 35% is put in, you can make a ****ty and maybe dangerous tune look great. Then your motor goes boom, and people like you go ??:/::

engineermike

Who said he is correcting for drivetrain losses? I've never known anyone to do that. Btw, judging by the layout of the graph, I'm betting it was dynojet.

rtran

He could give you the total breakdown, marketing, conditions, cost, where its made, how they do it and all that and you would still be here saying **** so it don't make a difference because they will always be someone questioning something. If someone's motor was to go boom already you would of saw that when you did your google searches on the product

TXGold

Well Tron, I just wanted to remind you that there is always gonna be someone saying you didn't do it right like me, but until a set of practices that are clear, or at least mostly clear is followed, you are more likely to hear about it. Go buy his tune, or you must have already by the sound of it. If this is your first car, you'll learn if not, stick to the stereo forum.